Computer-assisted analysis of three-dimensional MR angiograms

Radiographics

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 421-436

  Hernández Hoyos, Marcela ^a   Orkisz, Maciej ^a   Puech, Philippe ^a   Mansard Desbleds, Catherine ^a   Douek, Philippe ^a   Magnin, Isabelle E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 9*.7212; Computers, diagnostic aid; Images, analysis; Magnetic resonance (MR), image processing; Magnetic resonance (MR), three dimensional; Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies, 9*.721

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; STENOSIS, OCCLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0036511375     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.22.2.g02mr03421     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Lee VS, Doug JM, Krinsky GA, Rofsky NM. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: artifacts and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:197-205.
2. Barbier C, Lefevre F, Bui P, Denny P, Aiouaz C, Becker S. Contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries using 0.5 Tesla: comparison with selective digital angiography. J Radiol 2001; 82(3 pt 1): 245-249. [French]
3. Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Partanen PK, Tulla H, Vainio PA. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography? Neuroradiology 1996; 38:299-305.
4. Young GR, Humphrey PR, Nixon TE, Smith ET. Variability in measurement of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis as displayed by both digital subtraction and magnetic resonance angiography: an assessment of three caliper techniques and visual impression of stenosis. Stroke 1996; 27:467-473.
5. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet 2001; 357:1086-1091.
6. Wong KS, Lam WW, Liang E, Huang YN, Chan YL, Kay R. Variability of magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography in grading middle cerebral artery stenosis. Stroke 1996; 27:1084-1087.
7. Elgersma OE, Wust AF, Buijs PC, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2000; 216:511-516.
8. Clunie DA. DICOM structured reporting. Bangor, Pa: PixelMed, 2000.
9. Philips Medical Systems. DICOM Cook Book. Available at: ftp://ftp-wjq.philips.com/medical/ interoperability/out/DICOM_Information/ CookBook.pdf.
10. Horii SC. A nontechnical introduction to DICOM. RadioGraphics 1997; 17:1297-1309.
11. ACR and NEMA Digital Imaging and Communications Standards Committee. The DICOM V3.0 standard. Available at: http://medical.nema.org/ Dicom/Geninfo/brochure/BROCH95.DOC.
12. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Official DICOM Web page. Available at: http:// medical.nema.org/dicom.html.
13. eFilm Medical. eFilm Workstation. Available at: http://vww.efilm.ca.
14. Zhao M, Charbel FT, Alperin N, Loth F, Clark ME. Improved phase-contrast flow quantification by three-dimensional vessel localization. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18:697-706.
15. Gutberlet M, Hosten N, Beier J, et al. Quantification of the degree of a stenosis using multiplanar reformation (MPR) of a magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) data set and 2-dimensional MR images compared with MR-flow measurement in patients with coarctation. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG, eds. CARS '99: computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1999; 124-128.
16. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Carley JC, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radio-Graphics 1999; 19:745-764.
17. Hany TF, Schmidt M, Davis CP, Gohde SC, Debatin JF. Diagnostic impact of four postprocessing techniques in evaluating contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:907-912.
18. Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, Shapeero LG, Lee RE. Artifacts in maximum intensity projection display of MR angiograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154:623-629.
19. Orkisz M, Bresson C, Magnin IE, Champin O, Douek P. Improved vessel visualization in MR angiography by nonlinear anisotropic filtering. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37:914-919.
20. Anderson CM. Postprocessing and display. In: Anderson CM, Edelman RR, Turski P, eds. Clinical magnetic resonance angiography. New York, NY: Raven, 1993; 83-98.
21. Vital Images. Vitrea. Available at: http://www. vitalimages.com.
22. Wise SW, Hopper KD, Ten Have T, Schwartz T. Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: the dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:919-923.
23. Hu X, Alperin N, Levin DN, Tan KK, Mengeot M. Visualization of MR angiographic data with segmentation and volume-rendering techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 1:539-546.
24. Wilson DL, Noble JA. Segmentation of cerebral vessels and aneurysms from MR angiography data. In: Duncan J, Gindi G, eds. Information processing in medical imaging. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1230. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1997; 423-428.
25. Masutani Y, Schiemann T, Höne KH. Vascular shape segmentation and structure extraction using a shape-based region-growing model. In: Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp S, eds. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention: MICCAI '98. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1496. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1998; 1242-1249.
26. Chung ACS, Noble JA. Statistical 3D vessel segmentation using a Rician distribution. In: Taylor C, Colchester A, eds. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention: MICCAI '99. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1679. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1999; 82-89.
27. Verdonck B, Bloch I, Maître H, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Marchal G. Accurate segmentation of blood vessels from 3D medical images. In: 1996 International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '96). Vol 3. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1996; 311-314.
28. Nazarian B, Chédot C, Sequeira J. Automatic reconstruction of irregular tubular structures using generalized cylinders. Revue Internationale de CFAO et d'Informatique Graphique 1996; 11:11-20.
29. Lorenz C, Carlsen IC, Buzug TM, Fassnacht C, Weese J. Multi-scale line segmentation with automatic estimation of width, contrast and tangential direction in 2D and 3D medical images. In: Trocazz J, Grimson E, Mösges R, eds. CVRMed/ MRCAS '97. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1205. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1997; 233-242.
30. Wink O, Niessen WJ, Viergever MA. Fast quantification of abdominal aorta aneurysms from CTA volumes. In: Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp S, eds. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention: MICCAI '98. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1496. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1998; 138-145.
31. Wang KC, Dutton RW, Taylor CA. Improving geometric model construction for blood flow modeling. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1999; 18:33-39.
32. Swift RD, Ramaswamy K, Higgins WE. Adaptive axes generation algorithm for 3D tubular structures. In: 1997 International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '97). Vol 2. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1997; 136-139.
33. Orkisz M, Hernández-Hoyos M, Douek P, Magnin I. Advances of blood vessel morphology analysis in 3D magnetic resonance images. Machine Graphics Vision 2000; 9:463-471.
34. Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Hoogeveen RM, van Walsum T, Viergever MA. Model-based quantitation of 3-D magnetic resonance angiographic images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999; 18:946-956.
35. Bulpitt AJ, Berry E. An automatic 3D deformable model for segmentation of branching structures compared with interactive region growing. In: Berry E, ed. Proceedings of Medical Image Understanding and Analysis '98. Malvern, England: British Machine Vision Association, 1998; 189-192.
36. ETIAM. Dicom Eye. Available at: http://www. etiam.com.
37. University Hospital of Geneva. Osiris. Available at: http://www.expasy.ch/www/UIN/html1/projects/ osiris/osiris.html.
38. MediMatic. Dicom Viewer. Available at: http:// wwia.medimatic.com.
39. GE Medical Systems. MRI Flex Trial. Available at: http://apps.gemedicalsystems.com/geCommunity/ aw/FlexTrial/awmr_flextrial_home.jsp.
40. Siemens Medical Systems. Leonardo. Available at: http://siemensmedical.com.
41. Philips Medical Systems. Easy Vision. Available at: http://www.philips.com.
42. Marchand B, Hernández-Hoyos M, Orkisz M, Douek P. Diagnostic des sténoses de l'artère rénale en angiographie par résonance magnétique et appréciation du degré de sténose. J Mal Vasc 2001; 25:312-320.
43. Hernández-Hoyos M, Anwander A, Orkisz M, Roux JP, Douek PC, Magnin IE. A deformable vessel model with single point initialization for segmentation, quantification and visualization of blood vessels in 3D MRA. In: Delp SL, DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, eds. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention: MICCAI 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1935. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2000; 735-745.
44. Hernández-Hoyos M, Orkisz M, Roux JP, Douek PC. Inertia-based vessel axis extraction and stenosis quantification in 3D MRA images. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG, eds. CARS '99: computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1999; 189-193.
45. McInerney T, Terzopoulos D. Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey. Med Image Anal 1996; 1:91-108.
46. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vision 1988; 1: 321-331.
47. Cohen LD. On active contour models and balloons. Comput Vision Graphics Image Processing 1991; 53:211-218.
48. Renaudin CP, Barbier B, Roriz R, Revel D, Amiel M. Coronary arteries: new design for three-dimensional arterial phantoms. Radiology 1994; 190: 579-582.
49. Sato Y, Nakajima S, Atsumi H, et al. 3D multi-scale line filter for segmentation and visualization of curvilinear structures in medical images. In: Trocazz J, Grimson E, Mösges R, eds. CVRMed/ MRCAS '97. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1205. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1997; 213-222.
50. Prinet V, Monga O. Vessel representation in 2D and 3D angiograms. In: Lemke HU, Inamura K, Vannier MW, eds. CARS '97: computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1997; 240-245.