Efficient MHD Riemann solvers for simulations on unstructured triangular grids

Journal of Numerical Mathematics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 37-71

  Wesenberg, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

MHD equations; Performance of MHD Riemann solvers; Unstructured grids

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAXWELL EQUATIONS;

MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (MHD) EQUATIONS;

MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS;

EID: 0036453188     PISSN: 15702820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/JNMA.2002.37     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ANumE, Testcases in the DFG priority research program "Anaiysis and Numerics for Conservation Laws", http://rubens.math.uni-magdeburg.de/̃anume/testcase/index_e.html.
2. N. Aslan, Numerical solutions of one-dimensional MHD equations by a fluctuation approach. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids (1996) 22, No. 7, 569-580.
3. N. Aslan, Two-dimensional solutions of MHD equations with an adapted Roe method. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids (1996) 23, No. 11, 1211-1222.
4. N. Aslan and T. Kammash, Developing numerical fluxes with new sonic fix for MHD equations. J. Comp. Phys. (1997) 133, No. 1, 43-55.
5. D.S. Balsara, Linearized formulation of the Riemann problem for adiabatic and isothermal magnetohydrodynamics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. (1998) 116, 119-131.
6. J.B. Bell, P. Colella, and J.A. Trangenstein, Higher order Godunov methods for general systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comp. Phys. (1989) 82, No. 2, 362-397.
7. R. Beyerstedt and H. Freistühler, A class of algorithms solving Riemann's initial value problem for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Preprint No. 4-97, Institut für Mathematik der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, 1997.
8. J.U. Brackbill and D.C. Barnes, Note: The effect of nonzero ▽. B on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic equations. J. Comp. Phys. (1980)35, 426-430.
9. M. Brio and C.C. Wu, An upwind differencing scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comp. Phys. (1988) 75, No. 2, 400-422.
10. P. Cargo and G. Gallice, Roe matrices for ideal MHD and systematic construction of Roe matrices for systems of conservation laws. J. Comp. Phys. (1997) 136, 446-466.
11. S. Chandrasekhar, Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability. Dover, New York, 1981.
12. W. Dai and P.R. Woodward, Extension of the piecewise parabolic method to multidimensional ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comp. Phys. (1994) 115, No. 2, 485-514.
13. W. Dai and P.R. Woodward, A simple Riemann solver and high-order Godunov schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. J. Comp. Phys. (1995) 121, No. 1, 51-65.
14. W. Dai and P.R. Woodward, A high-order Godunov-type scheme for shock interactions in ideal magnetohydrodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. (1997) 18, No. 4, 957-981.
15. W. Dai and P.R. Woodward, A high-order iterative implicit-explicit hybrid scheme for magnetohydrodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. (1998) 19, No. 6, 1827-1846.
16. W. Dai and P.R. Woodward, A simple finite difference scheme for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamical equations. J. Comp. Phys. (1998) 142, No. 2, 331-369.
17. A. Dedner, F. Kemm, D. Kröner, C.-D. Munz, T. Schnitzer, and M. Wesenberg, Hyperbolic divergence cleaning for the MHD equations. J. Comp. Phys. (2002) 175, No. 2, 645-673.
18. A. Dedner, D. Kröner, C. Rohde, and M. Wesenberg, Godunov-type schemes for the MHD equations. In: Godunov Methods: Theory and Applications (Ed. E.F. Toro). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, November 2001, pp.209-216.
19. A. Dedner, D. Kröner, C. Rohde, and M. Wesenberg, MHD instabilities arising in solar physics: A numerical approach. In: Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications (Basel) (Eds. H. Freistühler and G. Warnecke). Inter. Series of Numer. Math., Vol. 140/141, Birkhäuser, 2001, Eighth International Conference in Magdeburg, February/March 2000.
20. A. Dedner, C. Rohde, and M. Wesenberg, A MHD-simulation in solar physics. In: Finite Volumes for Complex Applications II: Problems and Perspectives (Paris) (Eds. R. Vilsmeier, F. Benkhaldoun, and D. Hänel). Hermès Science Publications, 1999, pp.491-498.
21. A. Dedner and M. Wesenberg, Numerical methods for the real gas MHD equations. In: Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications (Basel) (Eds. H. Freistühler and G. Warnecke). Inter. Series of Numer. Math., Vol. 140/141, Birkhäuser, 2001, Eighth International Conference in Magdeburg, February/March 2000.
22. B. Einfeldt, C.D. Munz, P.L. Roe, and B. Sjögreen, Godunov-type methods near low densities. J. Comp. Phys. (1991) 92, No.2, 273-295.
23. M. Fey, Multidimensional upwinding. I: The method of transport for solving the Euler equations. J. Comp. Phys. (1998) 143, No. 1, 159-180.
24. M. Fey, Multidimensional upwinding. II: Decomposition of the Euler equations into advection equations. J. Comp. Phys. (1998) 143, No. 1, 181-199.
25. H. Freistühler and E.B. Pitman, A numerical study of a rotationally degenerate hyperbolic system. I: The Riemann problem. J. Comp. Phys. (1992) 100, No. 2, 306-321.
26. E. Godlewski and P.-A. Raviart, Numerical approximation of hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. In: Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 118. Springer, New York, 1996.
27. G.-S. Jiang and C.-C. Wu, A high-order WENO finite difference scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comp. Phys. (1999) 150, No. 2, 561-594.
28. B.-I. Jun, M.L. Norman, and J.M. Stone, A numerical study of Rayleigh-Taylor instability in magnetic fluids. Astrophys. J. (1995) 453, 332-349.
29. D. Kröner, Numerical schemes for conservation laws. Wiley-Teubner Series Advances in Numerical Mathematics, B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Stuttgart, 1997.
30. R.J. LeVeque, Numerical methods for conservation laws. Lectures in Mathematics, Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Berlin, 1990.
31. R.J. LeVeque, Wave propagation algorithms for multidimensional hyperbolic systems. J. Comp. Phys. (1997) 131, No. 2, 327-353.
32. X.L. Li, B.X. Jin, and J. Glimm, Numerical study for the three-dimensional Rayleigh-Taylor instability through the TVD/AC scheme and parallel computation. J. Comp. Phys. (1996) 126, No. 2, 343-355.
33. T.-P. Liu, The Riemann problem for general systems of conservation laws. J. Diff. Equations (1975) 18, 218-234.
34. A. Malagoli, G. Bodo, and R. Rosner, On the nonlinear evolution of magnetohydrodynamic Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities. Astrophys. J. (1996) 456, 708-716.
35. J.-M. Masella, I. Faille, and T. Gallouet, On an approximate Godunov scheme. Int. J. Comp. Fluid Dyn. (1999) 12, No. 2, 133-149.
36. R.S. Myong and P.L. Roe, On Godunov-type schemes for magnetohydrodynamics. I: A model system. J. Comp. Phys. (1998) 147, No. 2, 545-567.
37. H. Nessyahu and E. Tadmor, Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comp. Phys. (1990) 87, No. 2, 408-463.
38. S. Noelle, The MoT-ICE: A new high-resolution wave-propagation algorithm for multidimensional systems of conservation laws based on Fey's method of transport. J. Comp. Phys. (2000) 164, No. 2, 283-334.
39. S. Osher and F. Solomon, Upwind difference schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Math. Comp. (1982) 38, 339-374.
40. K.G. Powell, An approximate Riemann solver for magnetohydrodynamics (that works in more than one dimension). ICASE-Report No. 94-24 (NA8A CR-194902), NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681-0001, 8. April 1994.
41. K.G. Powell, P.L. Roe, T.J. Linde, T.I. Gombosi, and D.L. De Zeeuw, A solution-adaptive upwind scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comp. Phys. (1999) 154, No. 2, 284-309.
42. D. Ryu and T.W. Jones, Numerical magnetohydrodynamics in astrophysics: Algorithm and tests for one-dimensional flow. Astrophys. J. (1995) 442, 228-258.
43. D. Ryu, T.W. Jones, and A. Frank, Numerical magnetohydrodynamics in astrophysics: Algorithm and tests for multidimensional flow. Astrophys. J. (1995) 452, 785-796.
44. J. Smoller, Shock waves and reaction-diffusion equations. In: Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 258, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, 1983.
45. H. De Sterck, A. Csik, D. Vanden Abeele, S. Poedts, and H. Deconinck, Stationary two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic flows with shocks: Characteristic analysis and grid convergence study. J. Comp. Phys. (2001) 166, No. 1, 28-62.
46. H. De Sterck, B.C. Low, and S. Poedts, Characteristic analysis of a complex two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic bow shock flow with steady compound shocks. Phys. Plasmas (1999) 6, No. 3, 954-969.
47. J.M. Stone, J.F. Hawley, C.R. Evans, and M.L. Norman, A test suite for magnetohydrodynamical simulations. Astrophys. J. (1992) 388, 415-37.
48. H.-Z. Tang and K. Xu, A high-order gas-kinetic method for multidimensional ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comp. Phys. (2000) 165, No. 1, 69-88.
49. G. Tóth and D. Odstrčil, Comparison of some flux corrected transport and total variation diminishing numerical schemes for hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic problems. J. Comp. Phys. (1996) 128, No. 1, 82-100.
50. G. Tóth, The ▽ B = 0 constraint in shock-capturing magnetohydrodynamics codes. J. Comp. Phys. (2000) 161, 605-652.
51. IAM Universität Freiburg and IAM SFB 256 Universität Bonn, GRAPE-GRAphics Programming Environment. http://www.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de/IAM/Research/grape/GENERAL/index.html.
52. C.C. Wu, Formation, structure, and stability of MHD intermediate shocks. J. Geophys. Res. (1990) 95, No. A6, 8149-8175.
53. A.L. Zachary and P. Colella, Note: A higher-order Godunov method for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comp. Phys. (1992) 99, 341-347.
54. A.L. Zachary, A. Malagoli, and P. Colella, A higher-order Godunov method for multidimen-sional ideal magnetohydrodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. (1994) 15, No. 2, 263-284.