Developing numerical fluxes with new sonic fix for MHD equations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 133, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 43-55

  Aslan, Necdet ^a   Kammash, Terry ^b  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECAY (ORGANIC);

DECAY RATE; FLUX LIMITERS; GENERALIZED SYSTEMS; HYDRODYNAMICS EQUATION; MAGNETO HYDRODYNAMICS; NUMERICAL FLUX; SECOND ORDERS; SOURCE TERMS; SYSTEMS OF HYPERBOLIC EQUATIONS; TEST PROBLEM;

MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS;

EID: 0031139086     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1997.5644     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Harten A. High-resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 49:1983;235.
2. Sweby P. K. High-resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21:1984;995.
3. van Leer B., Lee W. T., Powell K. G. Sonic point capturing. AAIA J. 49:1983;235.
4. LeVeque R. J. High-resolution finite volume methods on arbitrary grids via wave propagation. J. Comput. Phys. 78:1988;36.
5. Roe P. L. Sonic flux formulae. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 13:1992;611.
6. N. Aslan, 1993, Computational Investigations of Ideal MHD Plasmas with Discontinuities, Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Michigan.
7. Zachary A., Colella P. A higher-order Godunov method for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 99:1992;341.
8. Glaister, 1987, An Approximate Riemann Solver for Compressible Flows with Axial Symmetry, Department of Mathematics, University of Reading.
9. Noh W. F. Errors for calculations of strong shocks using an artificial viscosity and an artificial heat flux. J. Comput. Phys. 72:1978;78.
10. Roe P. L. Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18:1986;337.
11. Roe P. L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43:1981;357.
12. Aslan N. Numerical solutions of one-dimensional MHD equations by a fluctuation approach. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 22:1996;569.
13. LeVeque R. J. Numerical methods for conservation laws. Lectures at ETH Zurich. 1989.
14. Roe Philip L. Some contributions to the modelling of discontinuous flows. Lectures Appl. Math. 22:1985;163.
15. Aslan N., Kammash T. Plasma dynamics in a magnetically insulated target for inertial fusion. Fusion Technol. 26:1994;184.
16. Brackbill J. U., Barnes D. C. The effect of nonzero∇B. J. Comput. Phys. 35:1980;426.
17. K. G. Powell, 1994, An Approximate Riemann Solver for Magnetohydrodynamics (That Works in More Than One Dimension), Langley, VA.
18. Gombosi T. I., Powell K. G., De Zeeuw D. L. Axisymmetric modelling of cometary mass loading on an adaptively refined grid. J. Geophys. Res. 99:1994;21525.
19. Woodward P., Colella P. The numerical solution of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54:1984;115.
20. Rider W. J. A review of approximate Riemann solvers with Godunov's method in Lagrangian coordinates. Comput. Fluids. 23:1994;397.
21. Sod G. A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 27:1978;1.
22. Brio M., Wu C. C. An upwind differencing scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 75:1988;400.
23. N. Aslan, 1995, Numerical solutions of 2-D MHD equations by finite volume method with quadrilateral cells, Proceedings, Ninth Int. Conf. in Numerical Meth. in Laminar and Turbulent Flow, 1995, 9-2, 1633.
24. Aslan N. Two dimensional solutions of MHD equations with adapted Roe's method. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 23:1996;1.