Lifetime prediction of CAD/CAM dental ceramics

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 780-785

  Lohbauer, Ulrich ^a   Petschelt, Anselm ^a   Greil, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ceramic; Crack growth; Dynamic fatigue; SPT diagram, CAD CAM

Indexed keywords

CRACK PROPAGATION; DENTAL COMPOSITES; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; GLASS CERAMICS; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

STRENGTH VALUES;

BIOMATERIALS;

ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; GLASS; LANTHANUM; ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORROSION; DYNAMICS; FATIGUE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MECHANICAL STRESS; PROBABILITY; STATISTICS; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MATERIALS TESTING; TIME;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMECHANICS; CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0036433677     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10468     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Datzmann G. CEREC Vitablocs Mark II machinable ceramic. Proceedings of the CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. In: Mörmann WH, editor. CAD/CIM in Aesthetic Dentistry. Berlin: Quintessenz Publishing, 1996.
2. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - A clinical study. J Dent 1999;27:325-331.
3. Roulet JR. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam - Results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997;1:40-46.
4. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthet 2000;13:194-199.
5. Reiss B, Walther W. Event analysis and clinical long term results of Cerec ceramic inlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1998;53:65-68.
6. Hüls A. The clinical utility of infiltration ceramic crowns. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1995;50:674-676.
7. Davidge RW, Evans AG. The strength of ceramics. Mater Sci Eng 1970;6:281-298.
8. Griffith AA. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc London 1920;221A:163-198.
9. Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Twiggs SW. Dynamic fatigue of feldspathic porcelain. Dent Mater 1993;9:269-273.
10. Ritchie RO, Dauskardt RH. Cyclic fatigue of ceramics: A mechanics approach to subcritical crack growth and life prediction. J Ceram Soc Jpn 1991;99:1047-1062.
11. Mecholsky JJ. Fracture mechanics principles. Dent Mater 1995;11:111-112.
12. Morena R, Beaudreau GM, Lockwood PE, Evans AL, Fairhurst CW. Fatigue of dental ceramics in a simulated oral environment. J Dent Res 1986;65:993-997.
13. Wiederhorn SM. Influence of water vapor on crack propagation in soda-lime-glass. J Am Ceram Soc 1967;50:407-414.
14. Charles RJ. Dynamic fatigue of glass. J Appl Phys 1958;29:1657-1662.
15. Munz D, Fett T. Ceramics. Berlin: Springer; 1999.
16. Sudreau F, Olagnon C, Fantozzi G. Lifetime prediction of ceramics: Importance of the test method. Ceram Int 1994;20:125-135.
17. Fett T. A Fracture-Mechanical Theory of subcritical crack growth in ceramics. Int J Fract 1992;54:117-130.
18. Weibull W. A statistical distribution function with wide applicability. J Appl Mech 1951;18:193-297.
19. Chadwick RG. Strength-probability-time (SPT) diagram - An adjunct to the assessment of dental materials?. J Dent 1994;22:364-369.
20. Hornberger H, Marquis PM, Christiansen S, Strunk HP. Microstructure of a high strength alumina glass composite. J Mater Res 1996;11:855-858.
21. Peterlik H. Comparison of evaluation procedures for the subcritical crack growth parameter n. J Eur Ceram Soc 1994;13:509-519.
22. Anusavice KJ, Brennan AB. Challenges to the development of esthetic alternatives to dental amalgam in an academic research center. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996;9:25-50.
23. Scholze H, Glas - Natur, Struktur und Eigenschaften. Berlin: Springer; 1977.
24. Sekita M, Fujimori A, Shimohira T, Ohashi H. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of a cerium-doped lanthanum alumino-silicate glass. J Non-Cryst Solids 1985;76:339-407.
25. Hornberger H. Strength Microstructure Relationships in a Dental Alumina Glass Composite. Erlangen: Institute of Microcharacterisation, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany, 1998.
26. Davidge RW, McLaren JR, Tappin G. Strength-probability-time (SPT) relationships in ceramics. J Mater Sci 1973;8:1699-1703.
27. Kappert HF, Knode H, Schultheiss R. Strength of the In-Ceram system under mechanical loads and thermocycling in artificial saliva. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1991;46:129-131.
28. Sindel J, Grellner F, Dierken C, Petschelt A, Greil P. Evaluation of subsurface damage in CAD/CAM machined dental ceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998;9:291-295.
29. Peterlik H. Comparison of evaluation procedures for the subcritical crack growth parameter n. J Eur Ceram Soc 1994;13:509-519.
30. Lawn BR. Fracture of Brittle Solids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
31. Tsai YL, Petsche PE, Annusavice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:27-32.
32. Yung YG, Peterson IM, Kim DK, Lawn BR. Lifetime-limiting strength degradation from contact fatigue in dental ceramics. J Dent Res 2000;79:722-731.