Human cortical dynamics determined by speech fundamental frequency

NeuroImage

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 1300-1305

  Mäkelä, Anna Mari ^a,b   Alku, Paavo ^c   Mäkinen, Ville ^a,b   Valtonen, Jussi ^a   May, Patrick ^a   Tiitinen, Hannu ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c Laboratory of Acoustics and Signal Processing   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEAD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SOUND; SPEECH; VOWEL;

EID: 0036431933     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1279     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alho, K. 1995. Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear Hearing 16: 38-51.
2. Alku, P., Sivonen, P., Palomäki, K., and Tiitinen, H. 2001. The periodic structure of vowel sounds is reflected in human electromagnetic brain responses. Neurosci. Lett. 298: 25-28.
3. Alku, P., Tiitinen, H., and Näätänen, R. 1999. A method for generating natural-sounding stimuli for cognitive brain research. Clin. Neurophys. 110: 1329-1333.
4. Belin, P., Zatorre, R. J., Lafaille, P., Ahad, P., and Pike, B. 2000. Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature 403: 309-312.
5. Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S. F., Springer, J. A., Kaufman, J. N., and Possing, E. T. 2000. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb. Cortex 10: 512-528.
6. Bolinger, D. 1989. Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse, Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford.
7. Corballis, M. C. 1998. Cerebral asymmetry: Motoring on. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2: 152-157.
8. Crottaz-Herbette, S., and Ragot, R. 2000. Perception of complex sounds: N1 latency codes pitch and topography codes spectra. Clin. Neurophys. 111: 1759-1766.
9. Dehaene-Lambertz, G. 1997. Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport 8: 919-924.
10. Dehaene-Lambertz, G., and Dehaene, S. 1994. Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants. Nature 370: 292-295.
11. Eimas, P. D., Miller, J. L., and Jusczyk, P. W. 1987. In Categorical Perception (S. Harnad, Ed.), pp. 161-188. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
12. Fant, G. 1970. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. Mouton, The Hague.
13. Gandour, J., Wong, D., and Hutchins, G. 1998. Pitch processing in the human brain is influenced by language experience. NeuroReport 9: 2115-2119.
14. Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., and Lounasmaa, O. V. 1993. Magnetoencephalography: Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65: 413-497.
15. Hari, R., Aittoniemi, K., Järvinen, M.-L., Katila, T., and Varpula, T. 1980. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain. Exp. Brain. Res. 40: 237-240.
16. Jäncke, L., Wüstenberg, T., Scheich, H., and Heinze, H.-J. 2002. Phonetic perception and the temporal cortex. NeuroImage 15: 733-746.
17. Johnsrude, I. S., Penhune, V. B., and Zatorre, R. J. 2000. Functional specificity in the right human auditory cortex for perceiving pitch direction. Brain 123: 155-163.
18. Katz, W. F., and Assmann, P. F. 2001. Identification of children's and adults' vowels: Intrinsic fundamental frequency, fundamental frequency dynamics, and presence of voicing. J. Phonetics 29: 23-51.
19. Kent, R. D., and Read, C. 1992. The Acoustic Analysis of Speech, Singular, San Diego.
20. Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., and Lindblom, B. 1992. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255: 606-608.
21. Liberman, A. M., and Mattingly, I. G. 1989. A specialization for speech perception. Science 243: 489-494.
22. Liberman, A. M., and Whalen, D. H. 2000. On the relation of speech to language. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4: 187-196.
23. May, P., Tiitinen, H., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Nyman, G., Taylor, J. G., and Näätänen, R. 1999. Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex. J. Comp. Neurosci. 6: 99-120.
24. Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Sinkkonen, J., and Alho, K. 1997. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature 385: 432-434.
25. Pantev, C., Hoke, M., Lehnertz, K., and Lütkenhöner, B. 1989. Neuromagnetic evidence of an amplitopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophys. 72: 225-31.
26. Pantev, C., Hoke, M., Lütkenhöner, B., and Lehnertz, K. 1989. Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: Pitch versus frequency representation. Science 246: 486-488.
27. Patel, A. D., and Balaban, E. 2001. Human pitch perception is reflected in the timing of stimulus-related cortical activity. Nat. Neurosci. 4: 839-844.
28. Poeppel, D., Phillips, C., Yellin, E., Rowley, H. A., Roberts, T. P. L., and Marantz, A. 1997. Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 221: 145-148.
29. Poeppel, D., Yellin, E., Phillips, C., Roberts, T. P. L., Rowley, H. A., Wexler, K., and Marantz, A. 1996. Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked M100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds. Cogn. Brain Res. 4: 231-242.
30. Ragot, R., and Lepaul-Ercole, R. 1996. Brain potentials as objective indexes of auditory pitch extraction from harmonics. NeuroReport 7: 905-909.
31. Rizzolatti, G., and Arbib, M. A. 1998. Language within our grasp. TINS 21: 188-194.
32. Roberts, T. P. L., Ferrari, P., Stufflebeam, S. M., and Poeppel, D. 2000. Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: Stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. J. Clin. Neurophys. 17: 114-129.
33. Roberts, T. P. L., and Poeppel, D. 1996. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. NeuroReport 7: 1138-1140.
34. Romani, G. L., Williamson, S. J., Kaufman, L., and Brenner, D. 1982. Characterization of the human auditory cortex by the neuromagnetic method. Exp. Brain Res. 47: 381-393.
35. Schreiner, C. E., Read, H. L., and Sutter, M. 2000. Modular organization of frequency integration in primary auditory cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23: 501-529.
36. Schwartz, J., and Tallal, P. 1980. Rate of acoustic change may underlie hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Science 207: 1380-1381.
37. Shtyrov, Y., Kujala, T., Lyytinen, H., Ilmoniemi, R. J., and Näätänen, R. 2000. Auditory cortex evoked magnetic fields and lateralization of speech processing. NeuroReport 11: 2893-2896.
38. Studdert-Kennedy, M., and Shankweiler, D. 1970. Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48: 579-594.
39. Tian, B., Reser, D., Durham, A., Kustov, A., and Rauschecker, J. P. 2001. Functional specialization in Rhesus monkey auditory cortex. Science 292: 290-293.
40. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., and Näätänen, R. 1994. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 372: 90-92.
41. Titze, I. 1994. Principles of Voice Production, Prentice Hall, NJ.
42. Uutela, K., Hämäläinen, M., and Somersalo, E. 1999. Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates. NeuroImage 10: 173-180.
43. Vihla, M., Lounasmaa, O. V., and Salmelin, R. 2000. Cortical processing of change detection: Dissociation between natural vowels and two-frequency tones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10590-10594.
44. Zatorre, R. J., and Belin, P. 2001. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 11: 946-953.
45. Zatorre, R. J., Belin, P., and Penhune, V. B. 2002. Structure and function of auditory cortex: Music and speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6: 37-46.
46. Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., and Gjedde, A. 1992. Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science 256: 846-849.