Phylogenetic relationships of Empetraceae inferred from sequences of chloroplast gene matK and nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS region

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 306-315

  Li, Jianhua ^a   Alexander Iii, John ^a   Ward, Tom ^a   Del Tredici, Peter ^a   Nicholson, Rob ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Ceratiola; Corema; Empetraceae; Empetrum; Hybrid; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

CERATIOLA; COREMA; COREMA ALBUM; COREMA CONRADII; EMPETRUM; ERICACEAE; RHODODENDRON;

MESSENGER RIBONUCLEIC ACID MATURASE; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASE; RIBONUCLEASE; RIBOSOME DNA;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; CHLOROPLAST; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; RHODODENDRON;

ANGIOSPERMS; CHLOROPLASTS; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; ENDORIBONUCLEASES; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASES; PHYLOGENY; RHODODENDRON;

EID: 0036431197     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00241-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderberg, A.A., 1992. Cladistic interrelationships and major clades of the Ericales. Plant Syst. Evol. 184, 207-231.
2. Anderberg, A.A., 1994. Phylogeny of the Empetraceae, with special emphasis on character evolution in the genus Empetrum. Syst. Bot. 19, 35-46.
3. Baldwin, B.G., Sanderson, M.J., Porter, J.M., Wojciechowski, M.F., Campbell, C.S., Donoghue, M.J., 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82, 247-277.
4. Baum, D.A., Small, R.L., Wendel, J.F., 1998. Biogeography and floral evolution of Baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Syst. Biol. 47, 181-207.
5. Chase, M. (and 42 other authors), 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80, 528-580.
6. Davis, G.L., 1966. Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. Wiley, New York.
7. Du Rietz, G.E., 1940. Problems of bipolar plant distribution. Act. Phytogeog. Suecica 13, 215-282.
8. Faris, J.S., Kallersjo, M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315-319.
9. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
10. Fernald, M.L., 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany. American Book Company, New York.
11. Good, R., 1927. The genus Empetrum L. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 47, 489-523.
12. Hanson, M.A., Gaut, B.S., Stec, A.O., Fuerstenberg, S.I., Goodman, M.M., Coe, E.H., Doebley, J.F., 1996. Evolution of anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize kernels: The role of regulatory and enzymatic loci. Genetics 143, 1395-1407.
13. Hilu, K.W., Liang, H.P., 1997. The matK gene - Sequence variation and application in plant systematics. Am. J. Bot. 84, 830-839.
14. Hultén, E., 1968. Flora of Alaska and Neighboring Territories. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
15. Humphries, C.J., Parenti, L.R., 1986. Cladistic Biogeography. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
16. Judd, W.S., Kron, K.A., 1993. Circumscription of Ericaceae (Ericales) as determined by preliminary cladistic analyses based on morphological, anatomical, and embryological features. Brittonia 45, 99-114.
17. Kellogg, E.A., Appels, R., Mason-Gamer, R.J., 1996. When genes tell different stories: The diploid genera of Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 21, 321-348.
18. Kron, K.A., 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of Rhododendroideae (Ericaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84, 973-980.
19. Kron, K.A., Chase, M., 1993. Systematics of the Ericaceae, Empetraceae, Epacridaceae and related taxa based upon rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80, 735-741.
20. Kron, K.A., Chase, M., Hills, H.G., 1991. Phylogenetic relationships of Ericaceae, Empetraceae, and Epacridaceae based on rbcL sequence data and their position within the Dilleniidae. Am. J. Bot. 78, 197-198.
21. Kron, K.A., King, J.M., 1996. Cladistic relationships of Kalmia, Leiophyllum, and Loiseleuria (Phyllodoceae, Ericaceae) based on rbcL and nrITS data. Syst. Bot. 21, 17-29.
22. Li, J.-H., Bogle, A.L., Klein, A.S., 1999a. Phylogenetic relationships of the Hamamelidaceae inferred from sequences of internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Am. J. Bot. 86, 1027-1037.
23. Li, J.-H., Bogle, A.L., Klein, A.S., 1999b. Phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidaceae: Evidence from the nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Plant Syst. Evol. 218, 205-219.
24. Liston, A., Robinson, W.A., Pinero, D., Alvarez-Bully, E.R., 1999. Phylogenetics of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 11, 95-109.
25. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
26. McEwen, M., 1894. The comparative anatomy of Corema alba and Corema conradii. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 21, 277-285.
27. Moore, D.M., 1983. Flora of Tierra del Fuego. Anthony Nelson and Missouri Bot. Gard, Shrewsbury, Missouri.
28. Moore, D.M., 1993. Empetraceae. In: Heywood, V. (Ed.), Flowering Plants of the World. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 128-129.
29. Moore, D.M., Harborne, J.B., Williams, C.A., 1970. Chemotaxonomy, variation and geographical distribution of the Empetraceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 63, 277-293.
30. Pizarro, C.M., 1959. Synopsis de la Flora Chilena. Ediciones de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago.
31. Plunkett, G.M., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., 1997. Clarification of the relationship between Apiaceae and Araliaceae based on matK and rbcL sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 84, 565-580.
32. Raven, P.H., 1963. Amphitropical relationships in the floras of North and South America. Quart. Rev. Biol. 38, 151-177.
33. Redfield, J., 1884. Corema conradii and its localities. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 21, 97-101.
34. Sang, T., Zhong, Y., 2000. Testing hybridization hypotheses based on incongruent gene trees. Syst. Biol. 49, 422-434.
35. Scoggan, H.J., 1978. The Flora of Canada, Part 3. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.
36. Soltis, D.E., Johnson, L.A., Looney, C., 1996. Discordance between ITS and chloroplast topologies in the Boykinia group (Saxifragaceae). Syst. Bot. 21, 169-185.
37. Swofford, D.L., 2000. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
38. Taylor, D.W., 1990. Paleobiogeographic relationships of angiosperms from the Cretaceous and early Tertiary of the North America area. Bot. Rev. 56, 279-320.
39. Templeton, A.R., 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular references to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37, 221-244.
40. Thorne, R.F., 1972. Major disjunctions in the geographic ranges of seed plants. Quart. Rev. Biol. 47, 365-411.
41. Vassiliev, V.N., 1949. Empetraceae. In: Shishkin, B.K. (Ed.), Flora SSSR, vol. 14. Akademia Nauk, Moscow, pp. 511-517.
42. Webb, D.A., 1972. Empetraceae. In: Tutin, T.G. (Ed.), Flora Europaea, Part 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Wendel, J.F., Doyle, J.J., 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: Window into genome history and molecular evolution. In: Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Doyle, J.J. (Eds.), Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwel, pp. 265-296.