Clarification of the relationship between Apiaceae and Araliaceae based on matK and rbcL sequence data

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 565-580

  Plunkett, Gregory M ^a,b   Soltis, Douglas E ^a   Soltis, Pamela S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apiaceae (Umbelliferae); Apiales; Araliaceae; Family pairs; matK; Phylogenetics; rbcL

Indexed keywords

APIACEAE; APIOIDEAE; ARALIACEAE; DELARBREA; MACKINLAYA; SANICULOIDEAE;

EID: 0030859169     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2446032     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. ARCHIE, J. W. 1989. A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data. Systematic Zoology 38: 239-252.
2. BALDWIN, B. G., M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
3. BAUM, D. A., K. J. SYTSMA, AND P. C. HOCH. 1994. A phylogenetic analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 19: 363-388.
4. BAUMANN, M. G. 1946. Myodocarpus und die Phylogenie der Umbelliferen-Fruchte. Umbellifloren-Studien I. Berichte der Schweizerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 56: 11-112.
5. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
6. BELL, C. R. 1971. Breeding systems and floral biology of the Umbelliferae, or evidence for specialization in unspecialized flowers. In V. H. Heywood [ed.], The biology and chemistry of the Umbelliferae, Supplement 1, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 93-108.
7. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 384-397.
8. BURTT, B. L., AND W. C. DICKISON. 1975. The morphology and relationships of Seemannaralia (Araliaceae). Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 33: 449-464.
9. CHASE, M. W., et al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
10. CHIPPINDALE, P. T., AND J. J. WIENS. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 43: 278-287.
11. CLARK, L. G., W. ZHANG, AND J. F. WENDEL. 1995. A phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae) based on ndhF sequence data. Systematic Botany 20: 436-460.
12. CRONQUIST, A. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants, 2d. ed. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY.
13. CULLINGS, K. W. 1992. Design and testing of a plant-specific PCR primer for ecological and evolutionary studies. Molecular Ecology 1: 233-240.
14. DAHLGREN, R. M. T. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 91-124.
15. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Systematic Biology 43: 368-372.
16. _, M. J. DONOGHUE, AND J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 657-681.
17. DONOGHUE, M. J, R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 333-345.
18. DOWNIE, S. R., AND D. S. KATZ-DOWNIE. 1996. A molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 234-251.
19. _, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Restriction site mapping of the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat: a molecular phylogeny of the Asteridae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 266-283.
20. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
21. DRUDE, C. G. O. 1898. Umbelliferae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die naturlichen Planzenfamilian 38: 63-128, 129-250. Leipzig.
22. EYDE, R. H., AND C. C. TSENG. 1971. What is the primitive floral structure of Araliaceae? Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 52: 205-239.
23. FAITH, D., AND P. CRANSTON. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? Cladistics 7: 1-28.
24. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
25. HEYWOOD, V. H. 1978. Introduction to the taxonomy of the Umbelliferae. In A. M. Cauwet and J. Carbonnier [eds.], Actes du 2e Symposium International sur les Ombellifères, Contributions Pluridesciplinaires à la Systématique, 107-112. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO.
26. HILLIS, D. M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 23-42.
27. _. 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. In M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft [eds.], Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences, 278-294. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
28. _, AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.
29. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1991. Tree-length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Systematic Zoology 40: 257-270.
30. _, D. L. SWOFFORD, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, J. J. BULL, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1994. Is character weighting a panacea for the problem of data heterogeneity in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 43: 288-291.
31. JOHNSON, L. A., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1994. matK DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s. str. Systematic Botany 19: 143-156.
32. -, AND _. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 149-175.
33. _, J. L. SCHULTZ, D. E. SOLTIS, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1996. Monophyly and generic relationships of Polemoniaceae based on matK sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 1207-1224.
34. JUDD, W. S., R. W. SANDERS, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1994. Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard Papers in Botany 1: 1-51.
35. KÄLLERSJÖ, M., J. S. FARRIS, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1992. Skewness and permutation. Cladistics 8: 275-287.
36. KREITMAN, M., AND L. F. LANDWEBER. 1989. A strategy for producing single-stranded DNA in the polymerase chain reaction: a direct method for genomic sequencing. Gene Analysis Techniques 6: 84-88.
37. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7-25.
38. LIERE, K., AND G. LINK. 1995. RNA binding activity of the matK protein encoded by the chloroplast trnK intron from mustard (Sinapis alba L.). Nucleic Acids Research 23: 917-921.
39. LOWRY, P. P. 1986. A systematic study of Delarbrea Vieill. (Araliaceae). Allertonia 4: 169-201.
40. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
41. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.01. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
42. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Systematic Zoology 30: 351-370.
43. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Systematic Biology 44: 64-76.
44. MORGAN, D. R., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 631-660.
45. Lys(UUU) gene from mustard (Sinapis alba) contains a class II intron potentially coding for a maturase-related polypeptide. Current Genetics 11: 251-257.
46. NICKRENT, D. L., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1995. A comparison of angiosperm phylogenies from nuclear 18S DNA and rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 208-234.
47. OLMSTEAD, R. G., B. BREMER, K. M. SCOTT, AND J. D. PALMER. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 700-722.
48. _, H. J. MICHAELS, K. M. SCOTT, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
49. _, AND P. A. REEVES. 1995. Evidence for the polyphyly of the Scrophulariaceae based on rbcL and ndhF sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 176-193.
50. _, AND J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
51. PHILIPSON, W. R. 1951. Contributions to our knowledge of Old World Araliaceae. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Botany 1: 3-20.
52. _. 1970a. Constant and variable features of the Araliaceae. In N. K. B. Robson, D. F. Cutler, and M. Gregory [eds.], New research in plant anatomy. Supplement 1. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 63: 87-100.
53. _. 1970b. A redefinition of Gastonia and related genera (Araliaceae). Blumea 18: 496-505.
54. PLUNKETT, G. M., D. E. SOLTIS, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1996. Higher level relationships of Apiales (Apiaceae and Araliaceae) based on phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 499-515.
55. _, _, AND _. In press. Evolutionary patterns in Apiaceae: inferences based on matK sequence data. Systematic Botany.
56. RODRÍGUEZ C., R. L. 1957. Systematic anatomical studies on Myrrhidendron and other woody Umbellales. University of California Publications in Botany 29: 145-317.
57. _. 1971. The relationships of the Umbellales. In V. H. Heywood [ed.], The biology and chemistry of the Umbelliferae, Supplement 1. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 63-91.
58. SANDERSON, M. J., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781-1795.
59. SHOUP, J. R., AND C. C. TSENG. 1977. Pollen of Klotzschia (Umbelliferae): a possible link to Araliaceae. American Journal of Botany 64: 461-463.
60. SMITH, A. C., AND B. C. STONE. 1968. Studies of Pacific Island plants, XIX. The Araliaceae of the New Hebrides, Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 49: 431-493.
61. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, T. G. COLLIER, AND M. L. EDGERTON. 1991. The Heuchera group (Saxifragaceae): evidence for chloroplast transfer and paraphyly. American Journal of Botany 78: 1091-1112.
62. SOLTIS, P. S., AND R. K. KUZOFF. 1993. ITS sequence variation within and among populations of Lomatium grayi and L. laevigatum (Umbelliferae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2: 166-170.
63. STEELE, K. P., AND R. VILGALYS. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Polemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Systematic Botany 19: 126-142.
64. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft [eds.], Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences, 295-333. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
65. TAKHTAJAN, A. 1987. System of Magnoliophyta. Academy of Sciences, Lenigrad.
66. THORNE, R. F. 1973. Inclusion of the Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) in the Araliaceae. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 32: 161-165.
67. _. 1992. Classification and geography of flowering plants. Botanical Review 58: 225-348.
68. TSENG, C. C. 1967. Anatomical studies of flowers and fruits in the Hydrocotyloideae (Umbelliferae). University of California Publications in Botany 42: 1-58.
69. WALTERS, S. M. 1961. The shaping of angiosperm taxonomy. New Phytologist 60: 74-84.
70. XIANG, Q. Y., D. E. SOLTIS, D. R. MORGAN, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornus L. senus lato and putative relatives inferred from rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 723-734.
71. ZOMLEFER, W. B. 1994. Guide to flowering plant families. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.