Contributions of study skills to academic competence

School Psychology Review

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 350-365

  Gettinger, Maribeth ^a   Seibert, Jill K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036401169     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (1994). New. designs for teaching and learning: Promoting active learning in tomorrow's schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Afflerbach, P., & Johnston, P. (1984). On the use of verbal reports in reading research. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 307-322.
3. Almasi, J.F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussion of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351.
4. Almasi, J.F., McKeown, M.G., & Beck, I.L. (1996). The nature of engaged reading in classroom discussions of literature. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 107-146.
5. Archambeault, B. (1992). Personalizing study skills in secondary students. Journal of Reading, 35, 468-472.
6. Baumann, J.F., & Bergeron, B.S. (1993). Story map instruction using children's literature: Effects on first graders' comprehension of central narrative elements. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 407-437.
7. Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131-156.
8. Bos, C.S., & Anders, P.L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31-42.
9. Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
10. Brown, R., Pressley, M., VanMeter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37.
11. Bulgren, J.A., Hock, M., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1995). The effects of instruction in a paired associates strategy on the information mastery performance of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 22-37.
12. Bulgren, J.A., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1994). The effects of a recall enhancement routine on the test performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 2-11.
13. Bulgren, J.A., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1997). Use of a recall enhancement routine and strategies in inclusive secondary classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 198-208.
14. Case, L.P., Mamlin, N., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1995). Self-regulated strategy development: A theoretical and practical perspective. In T.E. Scruggs & M.A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 9, pp. 21-46). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15. Chi, M.T.H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
16. Collins, C. (1991). Reading instruction that increases thinking abilities. Journal of Reading, 34, 510-516.
17. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Larkin, K.M. (1980). Inference in text understanding. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 385-407). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Damon, W. (1991). Problems in direction in socially shared cognition. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 384-397). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Davey, B., & McBride, M. (1986). Effects of question-generation on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 22, 2-7.
20. Decker, K., Spector, S., & Shaw, S. (1992). Teaching study skills to students with mild handicaps: The role of the classroom teacher. The Clearing House, 65, 280-284.
21. Deshler, D.D., Ellis, E.S., & Lenz, B.K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods. Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
22. Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In J.L. Graden, J.E. Zins, & M.J. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for students (pp. 391-411). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
23. Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (1993). Strategy mastery by at-risk students: Not a simple matter. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 153-167.
24. Devine, T.G. (1987). Teaching study skills: A guide for teachers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
25. Dreher, M.J., & Gambrell, L.B. (1985). Teaching children to use a self-questioning strategy for studying expository text. Reading Improvement, 22, 2-7.
26. Ellis, E.S. (1993). Integrative strategy instruction: A potential model for teaching content area subjects to adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 358-383.
27. Ellis, E.S., Deshler, D.D., Lenz, B.K., Schumaker, J.B., & Clark, F.L. (1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23, 1-24.
28. Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Ferro, S.C., & Pressley, M.G. (1991). Imagery generation by learning disabled and average-achieving 11-to 13-year-olds. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 231-239.
30. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206.
31. Fulk, B.J.M., Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, R.E. (1992). Mnemonic generalization training with learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 2-10.
32. Gajria, M., & Salvia, J. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 508-516.
33. Gambrell, L.B., & Bales, R.J. (1986). Mental imagery and the comprehension-monitoring performance of fourth- and fifth-grade poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 454-464.
34. Gersten, R. (1998). Recent advances in instructional research for students with learning disabilities: An overview. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(3), 162-170.
35. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S., Williams, J.P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities:A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
36. Gettinger, M., & Nicaise, M. (1997). Study skills. In G.G. Bear, K.M. Minke, & A. Thomas (Eds.), Children needs II: Development, problems, and alternatives (pp. 407-418). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
37. Goatley, V.J., Brock, C.H., & Raphael, T.E. (1995). Diverse learners participating in regular education "book clubs." Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 439-447.
38. Groteluschen, A.K., Borkowski, J.G., & Hales, C. (1990). Strategy instruction is often insufficient: Addressing the interdependency of executive and attributional processes. In T. Scruggs & B. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 81-101). New York: Springer-Verlag.
39. Harris, K., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392-404.
40. Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. York, ME: Stenhouse.
41. nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
42. Hoover, J.J. (1993). Helping parents develop a home-based study skills program. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 238-245.
43. Hoover, J.J., & Patton, P.R. (1995). Teaching students with learning problems to use study skills: A teacher guide. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
44. Jones, C.H., Slate, J.R., Blake, P.C., & Holifield, S.D. (1992). Two investigations of the academic skills of junior and senior high school students. High School Journal, 76(1), 24-29.
45. King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and note taking-review as strategies for learning from lecture. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303-323.
46. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 338-368.
47. Klingner, J.K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J.S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 99, 3-22.
48. Kucan, L., & Beck, I. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67, 271-299.
49. Lenz, B.K., Ellis, E.S., & Scanlon, D. (1996). Teaching learning strategies to adolescents and adults with learning disabilities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
50. Levin, M.E., & Levin, J.R. (1990). Scientific mnemonics: Methods for maximizing more than memory. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 301-321.
51. Levin, J.R. (1993). Mnemonic strategies and classroom learning: A twenty-year report card. Elementary School Journal, 94, 235-244.
52. Ley, K., & Young, D.B. (1998). Self-regulation behaviors in underprepared (developmental) and regular admission college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 42-64.
53. Loxterman, J.A., Beck, I.L., & McKeown, M.G. (1994). The effects of thinking aloud during reading on students' comprehension of more or less coherent text. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(4), 353-368.
54. Lucangeli, D., Coi, G., & Bosco, P. (1998). Metacognitive awareness in good and poor math problem solvers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 219-244.
55. Lucangeli, D., Galderisi, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1995). Specific and general transfer effects following metamemory training. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 11-21.
56. Malone, L.D., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 270-279.
57. Mastropieri, M.A., & Fulk, B.J.M. (1990). Enhancing academic performance with mnemonic instruction. In T.E. Scruggs & B.Y.L. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 103-121). New York: Springer-Verlag.
58. Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1997). Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 197-213.
59. McMahon, S.I., Raphael, T.E., & Goatley, V.J. (1995). Changing the context for classroom reading instruction: The Book Club project for urban students. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. V., pp. 123-166). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
60. Meltzer, L.S. (Ed.). (1993). Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
61. Mokhtari, S., & Reichard, C. (2002). Metacognitive awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(2), 29-34.
62. Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230-248.
63. Montague, M. (1998). Research on metacognition in special education. In T.E. Scruggs & M.A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 12, pp. 151-184). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
64. National Center for Education Statistics. (1990). National Assessment of Educational Progress Report. Washington, DC: Author.
65. National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities. (1997). Learning strategies for students with learning disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
66. Nicaise, M., & Gettinger, M. (1995). Fostering reading comprehension in college students. Reading Psychology, 16, 283-337.
67. Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
69. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1988). Teaching and practicing thinking skills to promote comprehension in the context of group problem solving. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 53-59.
70. Palincsar, A.S., & Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive context. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 211-225, 229.
71. Palincsar, A.S., & Klenk, L. (1994). Third invited response: Broader visions encompassing literacy, learners, and contexts. Remedial and Special Education, 14(2), 19-25.
72. Paris, S.G., & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation of exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 7-15.
73. Pearson, P.D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 815-860). New York: Longman.
74. st century (pp. 87-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Pressley, M. (1994). Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. In J. Mangieri & C.C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 112-139). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
76. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal reports of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
77. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and what education can do to promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857-867.
78. Pressley, M., Brown, R., El-Dinary, P.B., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 215-224.
79. Pressley, M., & El-Dinary, P.B. (1993). Special issue on strategy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 94(2).
80. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P.B., Gaskins, L., Schuder, T., Bergman, J.L., Almasi, J., & Brown, R. (1992), Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 511-554.
81. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P.B., Stein, S., Marks, M.B., & Brown, R. (1992). Good strategy instruction is motivating and interesting. In A. Reninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 333-358). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. Pressley, M., Hogan, K., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta, J., & Ettenberger, S. (1996). The challenges of instructional scaffolding: The challenges of instruction that supports student thinking. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 138-146.
83. nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
84. Pressley, M., Woloshyn, V., Lysynchuk, L.M., Martin, V., Wood, E., & Willoughby, T. (1990). Cognitive strategy instruction: The important issues and how to address them. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 1-58.
85. Purdie, N., & Hattie, J. (1996). Cultural differences in the use of strategies for self-regulated learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 845-871.
86. Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 87-100.
87. Rohwer, W.D. (1984). An invitation to an educational psychology of studying. Educational Psychologist, 9, 1-14.
88. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, J. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Education Research, 64, 479-530.
89. Rosenshine, B., Meister, J., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221.
90. Scanlon, D.J., Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (1994). Collaborative dialogues between teachers and researchers to create educational interventions: A case study. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 5, 69-76.
91. Scanlon, D.J., Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (1996). Can a strategy be taught and learned in secondary inclusive classrooms? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 41-57.
92. Scanlon, D.J., Duran, G.Z., Reyes, E.I., & Gallego, M.A. (1991). Interactive semantic mapping: An interactive approach to enhancing LD students' content area comprehension. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 142-146.
93. Scheid, K. (1993). Helping students become strategic learners: Guidelines for teaching. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
94. Schmid, R.F., & Telaro, G. (1990). Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 78-85.
95. Schunk, D.H. (2000). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
96. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
97. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford.
98. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1990). Mnemonic instruction for students with learning disabilities: What it is and what it does. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 271-280.
99. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1992). Classroom applications of mnemonic instruction: Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. Exceptional Children, 13, 271-280.
100. Spires, H.A., Gallini, J., & Riggsbee, J. (1992). Effects of schema-based and text structure-based cues on exposition prose comprehension in fourth graders. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 307-320.
101. Stensvold, M.S., & Wilson, J.T. (1990). The interaction of verbal ability with concept mapping in learning from a chemistry laboratory activity. Science Education, 74, 473-480.
102. nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
103. Vidal-Abarca, E., & Gilabert, R. (1995). Teaching strategies to create visual representations of ideas in content area text materials. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 433-447.
104. Waldron, N.L., & McLeskey, J. (2000). Preventing academic failure. In K.M. Minke & G.C. Bear (Eds.), Preventing school problem-Promoting school success: Strategies and programs that work (pp. 171-209). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
105. Weinstein, C.E., & Mayer, R.F. (1985). The teaching of learning strategies. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-329). New York: Macmillan.
106. Winne, P.H., & Hadwon, A.F. (1997). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 234-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
107. Wittrock, M.C. (1990). Generative process of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
108. Wong, B.Y.L. (1993). Pursuing an elusive goal: Molding strategic teachers and learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 354-357.
109. Wong, B.Y.L. (1994). Instructional parameters promoting transfer of learning strategies in students with LD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 110-120.
110. Wong, B.Y.L., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228-240.
111. Wood, E., Woloshyn, V.E., & Willoughby, T. (Eds.). (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction for middle and high school. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
112. Wyatt, D., Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P.B., Stein, S., Evans, P., & Brown, R. (1993). Reading behaviors of domain experts processing professional articles that are important to them: The critical role of worth and credibility monitoring. Learning and Individual Differences, 5, 49-72.
113. Zimmerman, B.J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73-86.
114. Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663 -676.
115. Zimmerman, B.J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
116. Zimmerman, B.J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C.E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 181-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
117. Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
118. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Education Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
119. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290.
120. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.