Self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis

School Psychology Review

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 405-427

  Bear, George G ^a   Minke, Kathleen M ^a   Manning, Maureen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036399135     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Banerji, M., & Dailey, R.A. (1995). A study of the effects of an inclusion model on students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 511-522.
2. Bear, G.G., Clever, A., & Proctor, W.A. (1991). Self-perceptions of nonhandicapped children and children with learning disabilities in integrated classes. Journal of Special Education, 24, 409-426.
3. Bear, G.G., & Minke, K.M. (1996). Positive bias in the maintenance of self-worth among children with LD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 23-32.
4. Bear, G.G., Minke, K.M., Griffin, S.M., & Deemer, S.A. (1997). Self-concept. In G.G. Bear & K.M. Minke (Eds.), Children's needs II: Development, problems and alternatives (pp. 257-269). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
5. Boersma, F.J., & Chapman, J.W. (1977). Student's Perception of Ability Scale. Alberta, Canada: Psi Can Consulting.
6. Boersma, F.J., & Chapman, J.W. (1992). Perception of Ability Scale for Students. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
7. Bracken, B.A. (1992). Examiner's manual for the Multi-dimensional Self-Concept Scale. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
8. Bracken, B.A. (1996a). Clinical applications of a context-dependent, multidimensional model of self-concept. In B.A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 463-503). New York: Wiley.
9. Bracken, B.A. (1996b). Preface. In B.A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. ix-xi). New York: Wiley.
10. Chapman, J.W. (1988). Learning disabled children's self-concepts. Review of Educational Research, 58, 347-371.
11. Clever, A., Bear, G., & Juvonen, J. (1992). Discrepancies between competence and importance in self-perceptions of children in integrated classes. Journal of Special Education, 26, 125-138.
12. Cooley, E.J., & Ayres, R.R. (1988). Self-concept and success-failure attributions of nonhandicapped students and students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 174-178.
13. nd ed., pp. 63-80). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Cooper, H. (1990). Meta-analysis and the integrative research review. In C. Hendrick & M.S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 142-163). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Cooper, H., DeNeve, K., & Charlton, K. (1997). Finding the missing science: The fate of studies submitted for review by a human subjects committee. Psychological Methods, 2, 447-452.
16. Coopersmith, S. (1981). Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
18. Elbaum, B., & Vanghn, S. (2001). School-based interventions to enhance the self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 303-329.
19. Eysenck, H.J. (1984). Meta-analysis: An abuse of research integration. Journal of Special Education, 18, 41-59.
20. Gettinger, M., & Koscik, R. (2001). Psychological services for children with learning disabilities. In J.N. Hughes, A.M. LaGreca, & J.C. Conoley (Eds.), Handbook of psychological services for children and adolescents (pp. 421-435). New York: Oxford University.
21. Glass, G.V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351-379.
22. Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Gresham, F.M., Lane, K.L., MacMillan, D.L., Bocian, K.M., & Ward, S.L. (2000). Effects of positive and negative illusory biases: Comparisons across social and academic self-concept domains. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 151-175.
24. Gresham, F.M., & Reschly, D.J. (1986). Social skill deficits and low peer acceptance of mainstreamed learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 23-32.
25. Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87-97.
26. Harter, S. (1985). The Self-Perception Profile for Children. Unpublished manual, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
27. Harter, S. (1988). The Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. Unpublished manual, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
28. Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self. New York: Guilford.
29. Harter, S., & Renick, M.J. (1988). The Self-Perception Profile for Learning Disabled Students. Unpublished manual, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
30. Hattie, J., & Marsh, H.W. (1996). Future directions in self-concept research. In B.A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 421-462). New York: Wiley.
31. Hedges, L.V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
32. Hedges, L.V. (1986). Issues in meta-analysis. In E. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 13, pp. 353-398). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
33. Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
34. Johnson, B.T. (1993). DSTAT 1.10: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures [Computer software and manual]. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Johnson, B.T., & Eagly, A.H. (2000). Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In H.T. Reis & C.M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 496-528). New York: Cambridge LIP.
36. Jordan, A., & Stanovich, P. (2001). Patterns of teacher-student interaction in inclusive elementary classrooms and correlates with student self-concept. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 48, 33-52.
37. Juvonen, J., & Bear, G.G. (1992). Social adjustment of children with and without learning disabilities in integrated classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 322-330.
38. Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S. (1995). The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S. (1996). Social skill deficits and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 226-237.
40. Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239-256.
41. Keith, L.K., & Bracken, B.A. (1996). Self-concept instrumentation: A historical and evaluative review. In B.A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 91-170). New York: Wiley.
42. Kistner, J.A., & Gatlin, D. (1989). Correlates of peer rejection among children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 133-140.
43. Kling, K.C., Hyde, J.S., Showers, C.J., & Buswell, B.N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470-500.
44. Kloomok, S., & Cosden, M. (1994). Self-concept in children with learning disabilities: The relationship between global self-concept, academic "discounting," nonacademic self-concept, and perceived social support. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 140-53.
45. Kuhne, M., & Wiener, J. (2000). Stability of social status of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 64-75.
46. MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., & Bocian, K.M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 314-326.
47. Marsh, H.W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129-149.
48. Marsh, H.W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417-430.
49. Marsh, H.W. (1988). Self-Description Questionnaire-I. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
50. Marshall, H.M., & Weinstein, R.S. (1984). Classroom factors affecting students' self-evaluations: An interactional model. Review of Educational Research, 54, 301-325.
51. Ochoa, S.H., & Olivarez, A. (1995). A meta-analysis of peer rating sociometric studies of pupils with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 29, 1-19.
52. Pearl, R., & Bay, M. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of learning disabilities. In U.L. Schwean & D.H. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of psychosocial characteristics of exceptional children (pp. 443-470). New York: Plenum.
53. Piers, E.V. (1969). Manual for the Piers-Harris Self-Concept Scale. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Tests.
54. Renick, M.J. (1990). Examining the self-perceptions of learning disabled children and adolescents: Issues of measurements and a model of global self-worth (Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(09), 4248B.
55. Renick, M.J., & Hatter, S. (1989). Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 631-638.
56. Riniolo, T.C. (1997). Publication bias: A computer-assisted demonstration of excluding nonsignificant results from research interpretation. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 279-282.
57. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
58. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59. Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183-192.
60. Sharpe, D. (1997). Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 881-901.
61. Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
62. Simmerman, S., & Swanson, H.L. (2001). Treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: How important are internal and external validity? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 221-236.
63. Smith, D.S., & Nagle, R.J. (1995). Self-perceptions and social comparisons among children with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 364-371.
64. Sohn, D. (1996). Publication bias and the evaluation of psychotherapy efficacy in reviews of the research literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 16, 147-156.
65. Stein, D.A. (1994). The relationship between special education programs and duration of placements on the self-concept of students with a learning disability. (Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(05), 1229A.
66. Stipek, D.J., & Daniels, D.H. (1988). Declining perceptions of competence: A consequence of changes in the child or in the instructional environment? Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 352-356.
67. Strein, W. (1993). Advances in research on academic self-concept: Implications for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 22, 273-284.
68. Swanson, H.L. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
69. Swanson, H.L. (2000). Issues facing the field of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 37-49.
70. Swanson, H.L., & Malone, S. (1992). Social skills and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of the literature. School Psychology Review, 21, 427-443.
71. Thompson, T. (1994). Self-worth protection: Review and implications for the classroom. Educational Review, 46, 259-274.
72. Troutman, G.C. (1993). The use of self-reports and peer reports as measures of self-esteem in middle school students (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(04), 2269B.
73. Vaughn, S., & Elbaum, B. (1999). The self-concept and friendships of students with learning disabilities: A developmental perspective. In R. Gallimore, L.P. Bernheimer, D.L. MacMillan, D.L. Speece, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on children with high-incidence disabilities (pp. 81-107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74. Whitman, P.B. (1987). Toward an integrative approach to learning disabilities: An analysis of subgroups (Doctoral dissertation, University of Vermont, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(11), 4668B.
75. Wilgenbusch, T., & Merrell, K.W. (1999). Gender differences in self-concept among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of multidimensional studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 101-120.
76. Yeung, A.S., Chui, H., Lau, I.C., McInerney, D.M., Russell-Bowie, D., & Suliman, R. (2000). Where is the hierarchy of academic self-concept? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 556-567.