Familial concepts and relationships in the conifers based on rbcL and matK sequence comparisons

Kew Bulletin

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 513-531

  Quinn, Chris J ^a   Price, R A ^a   Gadek, P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGATHIS; ARAUCARIACEAE; CEPHALOTAXACEAE; CEPHALOTAXUS; CONIFEROPHYTA; CUPRESSACEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA; GINKGO BILOBA; PHYLLOCLADUS; PINACEAE; PODOCARPACEAE; SCIADOPITYACEAE; TAXACEAE; WOLLEMIA;

EID: 0036395183     PISSN: 00755974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4110984     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bock, W. (1954). Primaraucaria, a new araucarian genus from the Virginia Triassic. J. Paleontol. 28: 32 - 42.
2. Brunsfeld, S. J., Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Gadek, P. A., Quinn, C. J., Strenge, D. D. & Ranker, T. A. (1994). Phylogenetic relationships among the genera of Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae. evidence from rbcL sequences. Syst. Bot. 19: 253 - 262.
3. Chambers, T. C., Drinnan, A. N. & McLoughlin, S. (1998). Some morphological features of Wollemi Pine (Wollemia nobilis: Araucariaceae) and their comparison to Cretaceous plant fossils. Int. J. Plant Sci. 159: 160 - 171.
4. Chase, M. W., et al. (1993). Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Card. 80: 528 - 580.
5. Chaw, S-M., Zharkikh, A., Sung, H. S., Lau, T-C. & Li, W-H. (1997). Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Molec. Biol. Evol. 14: 56 - 68.
6. Chen, Z-K. & Wang, F-H. (1990). On the embryology and relationship of Cephalotaxaceae and Taxaceae. Cathaya 2: 41 - 52.
7. Cheng, Y., Nicolson, R. G., Tripp, K. & Chaw, S-M. (2000). Phylogeny of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae genera inferred from chloroplast matK gene and nuclear rDNA ITS region. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 14: 353 - 365.
8. Conran, J. G., Wood, G. A., Martin, P. G., Dowd, J. M., Quinn, C. J., Gadek, P. A. & Price, R. A. (2000). Generic relationships within and between the gymnosperm families Podocarpaceae and Phyllocladaceae based on an analysis of the cp gene rbcL. Austral. J. Bot. 48: 715 - 724.
9. Donoghue, M. J., Olmstead, R. G., Smith, J. F. & Palmer, J. D. (1992). Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Card. 79: 333 - 345.
10. Doyle, J. A. (1996). Seed plant phylogeny and the relationships of Gnetales. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 157 Supplement: 3 - 39.
11. _ & Brennan, M. (1971). Cleavage polyembryony in conifers and taxads - a survey. Podocarps, taxads and taxodioids. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc., Ser. A 4: 57 - 88.
12. Ehrendorfer, F. (1991). Gymnosperma, Nacktsamer. In P. Sitte, H. Ziegler, F. Ehrendorfer & A. Bresinsky (eds.), Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen. 712 - 730. Fischer, Stuttgart.
13. Eriksson, T. (2000). AutoDecay version 4.0.2'. (Program distributed by author) Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
14. Farjon, A. (1998). World checklist and bibliography of conifers. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
15. Farris, J. S. (1969). A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18: 374 - 385.
16. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783 - 791.
17. Florin, R. (1948). On the morphology and relationships of the Taxaceae. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville) 110: 31 - 39.
18. _ (1951). Evolution of cordaites and conifers. Acta Horti Berg. 15: 285 - 388.
19. _ (1954). The female reproductive organs of conifers and taxads. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 29: 367 - 389.
20. Gadek, P. A., Alpers, D. L., Heslewood, M. M. & Quinn, C. J. (2000). Relationships within Cupressaceae sensu lato: a combined morphological and molecular approach. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1044 - 1057.
21. Gilmore, S. & Hill, K. D. (1997). Relationships of the Wollemi Pine (Wollemia nobilis) and a molecular phylogeny of the Araucariaceae. Telopea 7: 177 - 302.
22. Gugerli, F., Sperisen, C., Büchler, U., Brunner, I., Brodbeck, S., Palmer, J. D. & Qiu, Y-L. (2001). The evolutionary split of Pinaceae from other conifers: evidence from an intron loss and multigene phylogeny. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 21: 167 - 175.
23. Hair, J. B. (1963). Cytological relationships of the southern podocarps. Pacific basin biogeography, pp. 401 - 414. Bishop Museum, Hawaii.
24. _ & Beuzenberg, E. J. (1958). Chromosomal evolution in the Podocarpaceae. Nature 181: 1584 - 1586.
25. Harris, T. M. (1976). The Mesozoic gymnosperms. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 21: 119 - 134.
26. Hart, J. A. (1987). A cladistic analysis of conifers: preliminary results. J. Arnold Arbor. 68: 269 - 307.
27. Hill, R. S. & Brobribb, T. J. (1999). Southern conifers in time and space. Austral. J. Bot. 47: 639 - 696.
28. Kelch, D. G. (1997). The phylogeny of the Podocarpaceae based on morphological evidence. Syst. Bot. 22: 113 - 131.
29. _ (1998). Phylogeny of Podocarpaceae - comparison of evidence from morphology and 18S rDNA. Anger. J. Bot. 85: 986 - 996.
30. _ (2002). Phylogenetic assessment of the monotypic genera Sundacarpus and Manoao (Coniferales: Podocarpaceae) utilizing evidence from 18S rDNA sequences. Austral. Syst. Bot. 15: 29 - 35.
31. Keng, H. (1973). On the family Phyllocladaceae. Taiwania 18: 142 - 145.
32. _ (1974). The phylloclade of Phyllocladus and its possible bearing on the branch systems of progymnosperms. Ann. Bot. (London) 38: 757 - 764.
33. _ (1975). A new scheme of classification of confers and taxads. Taxon 24: 289 - 292.
34. Li, H-L. (1953). Present distribution and habitats of the conifers and taxads. Evolution 7: 245 - 261.
35. Liang, H. & Hilu, K. W. (1996). Application of the matK gene sequences to grass systematics. Canad. J. Bot 74: 125 - 134.
36. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. (2000). MacClade 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
37. Miller, C. N. (1999). Implications of fossil conifers for the phylogenetic relationships of living families. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 65: 239 - 277.
38. Nixon, K. C., Crepet, W. L., Stevenson, D. & Frits, E. M. (1994). A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 484 - 533.
39. Page, C. N. (1990). Coniferophytina. In: K. U. Kramer & P. S. Green (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
40. Price, R. A., Thomas, J., Strauss, S. H., Gadek, P. A., Quinn, C. J. & Palmer, J. D. (1993). Familial relationships of conifers from rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. (Suppl.) 80: 172.
41. _ (in press). Generic and familial relationships of the Taxaceae from rbcL and matK sequence comparisons. Acta Hort.
42. Quinn, C.J. (1986). Embryogeny in Phyllocladus. New Zealand J. Bot. 24: 575 - 579.
43. _ (1987). The Phyllocladaceae H. Keng - a critique. Taxon 36: 559 - 565.
44. _ & Price, R. (in press). Relationships of southern conifers. Acta Hort.
45. Rothwell, G. W. (1982). New interpretation of the earliest conifers. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 37: 7 - 28.
46. Schweitzer, H. (1996). Voltzia hexagona (Bischoff) GEINITZ aus dem mittleren Perm Westdeutschlands. Palaeontographica, Abt. B, Paläophytol. 239: 1 - 22.
47. Setoguchi, H., Osawa, T. A., Pintaud, J-C., Jaffre, T. & Veillon, J-M. (1998). Phylogenetic relationships within Araucariaceae based on rbcL gene sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1507 - 1516.
48. Sporne, K. R. (1965). The morphology of gymnosperms: the structure and evolution of primitive seed plants. Hutchinson, London.
49. Stefanovic, S., Jager, M., Deutsch, J., Broutin, J. & Masselot, M. (1998). Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 688 - 697.
50. Stewart, W. N. & Rothwell, G. N. (1993) Paleobotany and the evolution of plants 2nd. edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
51. Stützel, T. & Röwekamp, I. (1999). Female reproductive structures in Taxales. Flora 194: 145 - 157.
52. *and other methods). Version 4.0b8. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
53. Tomlinson, P. B., Takaso, T. & Rattenbury, J. A. (1989a). Cone and ovule ontogeny in Phyllocladus (Podocarpaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 99: 209 - 221.
54. _ _ & _ (1989b). Developmental shoot morphology in Phyllocladus (Podocarpaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 99: 223 - 248.
55. _, Braggins, J. E. & Rattenbury, J. A. (1997). Contrasted pollen capture mechanisms in Phyllocladaceae and certain Podocarpaceae (Coniferales). Amer. J. Bot. 84: 214 - 223.
56. Townrow, J. A. (1967). On Rissikia and Mataia, podocarpaceous conifers from the Lower Mesozoic of southern lands. Pap. Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania 101: 103 - 136.
57. Wang, X-Q., Tank, D. C. & Sang, T. (2000). Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae. evidence from three genomes. Molec. Biol. Evol. 17: 773 - 781.