The phylogeny of the Podocarpaceae based on morphological evidence

Systematic Botany

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 113-131

  Kelch, Dean G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NAGEIA; PHYLLOCLADUS; PODOCARPACEAE; PODOCARPUS; SAXEGOTHAEA;

EID: 0030842013     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419680     Document Type: Article

References (131)

1. ALLAN, H. H. 1961. Flora of New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: R. E. Owen.
2. AUDLEY-CHARLES, M. G. 1987. Dispersal of Gondwanaland: relevance to evolution of the angiosperms. Pp. 5-25 in Biogeographical evolution of the Malay Archipelago, ed. T. C. Whitmore. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. BERTRAND, M. C. E. 1874. Anatomie comparée des tiges et des feuilles chez le Gnétacées et les Conifères. Annales des Sciences Naturelle Botanique 20: 5-153.
4. BOYLE, P. and J. DOYLE. 1953. Development in Podocarpus nivalis in relation to other podocarps. I. Gametophytes and fertilization. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 26: 179-205.
5. _ and _. 1954. Development in Podocarpus nivalis in relation to other podocarps. II. Embryology in Eupodocarpus. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 26: 289-312.
6. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
7. BROWNLIE, G. 1953. Embryology of the New Zealand species of the genus Podocarpus section Eupodocarpus. Phytomorphology 3: 295-306.
8. BUCHHOLZ, J. T. 1933. Determinate cleavage polyembryony with special reference to Dacrydium. Botanical Gazette (London) 94: 579-588.
9. _. 1941. Embryology of the Podocarpaceae. Botanical Gazette (London) 103:1-37.
10. _ and N. E. GRAY. 1948a. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus I. The sections of the genus and their subdivisions with special reference to leaf anatomy. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 29: 49-83.
11. _ and _. 1948b. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus II. The American species of Podocarpus section Stachycarpus. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 29: 64-83.
12. _ and _. 1948c. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus IV. The American species of section Eupodocarpus sub-sections C and D. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 29: 123-151.
13. BURLINGAME, L. L. 1908. The staminate cone and male gametophyte of Podocarpus. Botanical Gazette 46: 161-178.
14. CHAW, S-W., H. LONG, B-S. WANG, A. ZHARKIKH, and W-H. LI. 1993. The phylogenetic position of the Taxaceae based on 18s rDNA sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 37: 624-630.
15. COOKSON, I. C. 1954. The identification of the sporomorph Phyllocladites with Dacrydium and its distribution in southern Tertiary deposits. Australian Journal of Botany 2: 60-68.
16. _ and K.M. PIKE. 1953a. A contribution to the Tertiary occurrence of the genus Dacrydium in the Australian region. Australian Journal of Botany 1: 474-484.
17. _ and _. 1953b. The Tertiary occurrence and distribution of Podocarpus (section Dacrycarpus) in Australia and Tasmania. Australian Journal of Botany 1: 71-82.
18. _ and _. 1954. The fossil occurrence of Phyllocladus and two other podocarpaceous types in Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 2: 60-68.
19. COUPER, R. A., 1963. Southern Hemisphere Mesozoic and Tertiary Podocarpaceae and Fagaceae and their palaeogeographic significance. Pp. 491-500 in Pacific basin biogeography, ed. J. L. Gressit. Honolulu, Hawaii: Bishop Museum Press.
20. CRANWELL, L. M. 1961. Coniferous pollen types of the Southern Hemisphere, I. Aberration in Acmopyle and Podocarpus dacrydioides. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 42: 416-425.
21. DALLIMORE, W., A. B. JACKSON, and S.G. HARRISON. 1966. Taxaceae. Pp. 37-106 in A handbook of Coniferae and Ginkgoaceae, 4th ed. London: Edward Arnold.
22. DEFERRE, Y., M. L. ROUANE, and P. WOLTZ. 1975. Plantules de Podocarpacées. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 111: 303-321.
23. DE LAUBENFELS, D. J. 1959. Parasitic conifer found in New Caledonia. Science 130: 97.
24. _. 1962. The primitiveness of polycotyledony considered with special reference to the cotyledonary condition in Podocarpaceae. Phytomorphology 12: 296-299.
25. _. 1969. A revision of the Malesian and Pacific rainforest conifers. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 50: 274-369.
26. _. 1972. Podocarpaceae. Pp. 15-79 in Flore de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et dépendances 4: Gymnospermes, eds. A. Aubreville and J. F. Leroy. Paris: Museum National D'Histoire Naturelle.
27. _. 1978. The genus Prumnopitys (Podocarpaceae) in Malesia. Blumea 24: 189-190.
28. _. 1985. A taxonomic revision of the genus Podocarpus. Blumea 30: 251-278.
29. _. 1987. Revision of the genus Nageia (Podocarpaceae). Blumea 32: 209-211.
30. DETTMANN, M. E., R. E. MOLNAR, J. G. DOUGLAS, D. BURGER, C. FIELDING, H. T. CLIFFORD, J. FRANCIS, P. JELL, T. RICH, M. WADE, P. V. RICH, N. PLEDGE, A. KEMP, and A. ROZEFELDS. 1992. Australian Cretaceous terrestrial faunas and floras: biostratigraphic and biogeographic implications. Cretaceous Research 13: 207-262.
31. DILCHER, D. L. 1968. Podocarpus from the Eocene of North America. Science 164: 299-301.
32. DONOGHUE, M. J. 1989. Phytogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43: 1137-1156.
33. _, R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, and J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 79: 333-345.
34. DOYLE, J. 1954. Development of Podocarpus nivalis in relation to other podocarps III: general conclusions. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 26: 347-377.
35. _ and S. J. BRENNAN. 1971. Cleavage polyembryony in conifers and taxads - a survey. 1. Podocarps, taxads and taxodioids. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 4: 57-88.
36. _ and W. LOOBY. 1939. Embryology in Saxegothaea and its relation to other podocarps. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 22: 127-147.
37. DOYLE, J. A. and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Botanical Review 52: 321-431.
38. _ and _. 1987. The importance of fossils in elucidating seed plant phylogeny and macroevolution. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 50: 63-95.
39. KENWALDER, J. E. 1976. Reevaluation of Cupressaceae and Taxodiaceae: a proposed merger. Madroño 23: 237-256.
40. ENDLICHER, I. L. 1847. Synopsis Conifarum. Sangalli: Scheitlin and Zollikofer.
41. ERDTMAN, G. 1965. Pollen and spore morphology/plant taxonomy, Vol. 3: Gymnospermae, Bryophyta. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.
42. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phytogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
43. FLORIN, R. 1931. Untersuchungen zur Stammesgeschichte der Coniferales und Cordaitales. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps Academiens Handlingar 10: 1-116.
44. _. 1940. The Tertiary fossils of South Chile and their phytogeographical significance. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps Academiens Handlingar 19: 1-107.
45. _. 1957. Notes on the systematics of the Podocarpaceae. Acta Horti Bergiani 17: 403-411.
46. Fu, D-Z. 1992. Nageiaceae - a new gymnosperm family. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 30: 515-528.
47. GARDEN, J. and L. A. S. JOHNSON. 1950. Microstrobos, a new name for a podocarpaceous genus. Contributions of the New South Wales National Herbarium 1: 519-520.
48. GAUSSEN, H. 1973. Les Gymnospermes actuelles et fossiles. Les Podocarpines, étude générale. Travaux du Laboratoire Forestier de Toulouse 12: 1-149.
49. GIVNISH, T. J. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: dioecy and dispersal in gymnosperms. Evolution 34: 959-972.
50. GORDON, G. 1858. Pinetum. London: H. G. Bohn.
51. GRAY, N. E. 1953a. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus VII. The African species of Podocarpus: section Afrocarpus. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 34: 67-76.
52. _. 1953b. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus VIII. The African species of section Eupodocarpus, subsections A and E. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 34: 163-171.
53. _. 1955. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus IX. The South Pacific species of section Eupodocarpus, subsection F. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 36: 199-207.
54. _. 1956. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus X. The South Pacific species of section Eupodocarpus subsection D. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 37: 160-172.
55. _. 1958. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus XI. The South Pacific species of section Podocarpus subsection B. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 39: 424-477.
56. _. 1960. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus XII. Podocarpus section Microcarpus. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 41: 36-39.
57. _. 1962. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus XIII. Section Polypodiopsis in the South Pacific. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 43: 67-79.
58. _ and J. T. BUCCHOLZ. 1951a. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus V. The South Pacific species of Podocarpus section Stachycarpus. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 32: 82-92.
59. _ and _. 1951b. A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus VI. The South Pacific species of Podocarpus ction Sundacarpus. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 32: 93-97.
60. GREENWOOD, D. R. 1987. Early Tertiary Podocarpaceae: megafossils from the Eocene Anglesea locality, Victoria Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 35: 111-133.
61. HAIR, J. B. 1963. Cytogeographical relationships of the southern podocarps. Pp. 401-414 in Pacific Basin Biogeography, ed. J. L. Gressit. Honolulu, Hawaii: Bishop Museum Press.
62. _ and E. J. BEUZENBERG. 1958. Chromosomal evolution in the Podocarpaceae. Nature 181: 1584-1586.
63. HART, J. A. 1987. A cladistic analysis of conifers: preliminary results. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 68: 269-305.
64. HILL, R. S. and R. J. CARPENTER. 1991. Evolution of Acmopyle and Dacrycarpus (Podocarpaceae) foliage as inferred from macrofossils in south-eastern Australia. Australian Systematic Botany 4: 449-479.
65. _ and M. POLE. 1992. Leaf and shoot morphology of extant Afrocarpus, Nageia, and Retrophyllum (Podocarpaceae) species and species with similar leaf arrangement from Tertiary sediments in Australasia. Australian Systematic Botany 5: 337-358.
66. KENG, H. 1973. On the family Phyllocladaceae. Taiwania 18: 142-145.
67. _. 1978. The genus Phyllocladus (Phyllocladaceae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 59: 249-273.
68. KHAN, A. G. and P. G. VALDER. 1971. The occurrence of root nodules in the Ginkgoales, Taxales, and Coniferales. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 97: 35-41.
69. KIMURA, T., T. OHANA, and K. MIMOTO. 1988. Discovery of a podocarpaceous plant from the Lower Cretaceous of Kochi Prefecture, in the outer zone of southwest Japan. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, B 64: 213-216.
70. KRASSILOV, V. A. 1967. Cretaceous flora of South Primorye and its bearing on stratigraphy. Moscow: Nauka.
71. _. 1974. Podocarpus from the Upper Cretaceous of eastern Asia and its bearing on the theory of conifer evolution. Palaeontology 17: 365-370.
72. LAWSON, A. A. 1923. The Life history of Microcachrys tetragona (Hook.). Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 48: 177-195.
73. LOOBY, W. J. and J. DOYLE. 1944a. Fertilization and early embryology in Podocarpus andinus. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 23: 257-275.
74. _ and _. 1944b. The gametophytes of Podocarpus andinus. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 22: 222-237.
75. MADDISON, W. P. and D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: interactive analysis of phytogeny and character evolution, version 3.04. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
76. RKHAM, K., R. F. WEBBY, B. P. J. MOLLY, and C. VILAIN. 1989. Support from flavonoid glycoside distribution for the division of Dacrydium sensu lato. New Zealand Journal of Botany 27: 1-11.
77. MEDUS, J., R. GAJARDO, and P. WOLTZ. 1989. Exine structure of Dacrydium fonkii, Saxegothaea conspicua and Stachycarpus andina (Podocarpaceae) from South America. Grana 28: 19-23.
78. MILLER, C. N. 1988. The origin of modern conifer families. Pp. 448-486 in Origin and evolution ofgymnosperms, ed. C. B. Beck. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
79. MULLER, J. 1966. Montane pollen from the Tertiary of northwest Borneo. Blumea 14: 231-235.
80. NIXON, K. C., W. L. CREPET, E. M. FRIIS, and D. W. STEVENSON. 1994. A reevaluation of phylogenetic relationships of seed plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 81: 484-533.
81. PAGE, C. N. 1988. New and maintained genera in the conifer families Podocarpaceae and Pinaceae. Notes of the Royal Botanic Garden of Edinburgh 45: 377-395.
82. _. 1990. Pinatae. Pp. 317-346 in The genera of seed plants. Volume I: Pteridophytes and gymnosperms, eds. K. U. Kramer and P. S. Green. New York: SpringerVerlag.
83. PATEL, R. N. 1967a. Wood anatomy of Podocarpaceae indigenous to New Zealand 1. Dacrydium. New Zealand Journal of Botany 5: 171-184.
84. _. 1967b. Wood anatomy of Podocarpaceae indigenous to New Zealand 2. Podocarpus. New Zealand Journal of Botany 5: 307-321.
85. PHILIPPI, R. A. 1861. Zwei neue Gattungen der Taxineen aus Chile. Linnaea 30: 730-735.
86. PHILLIPS, E. W. J. 1940. The identification of coniferous woods by their microscopic structure. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 52: 259-320.
87. PILGER, R. 1903. Taxaceae. Pp. 33-99 in Das Planzenreich IV, ed. A. Engler. Neudruck: H.R. Engelmann.
88. _. 1926. Podocarpaceae. Pp. 211-241 in Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol. 13: Gymnospermae, eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
89. PLAYFORD, G. and M. E. DETTMANN. 1978. Pollen of Dacrydium franklinii Hook f. and comparable Early Tertiary microfossils. Pollen & Spores 20: 513-534.
90. POCKNALL, D. T. 1981a. Pollen morphology of the New Zealand species of Dacrydium Solander, Podocarpus L'Héritier, and Dacrycarpus Endlicher (Podocarpaceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany 19: 67-95.
91. _. 1981b. Pollen morphology of Phyllocladus. New Zealand Journal of Botany 19: 259-266.
92. QUINN, C. J. 1964. Gametophyte development and embryology in the Podocarpaceae I. Podocarpus, section Dacrycarpus. Phytomorphology 14: 342-351.
93. _. 1965. Gametophyte development and embryology in the Podocarpaceae II. Dacrydium laxifolium. Phytomorphology 15: 37-45.
94. 1966a. Gametophyte Development and embryology in the Podocarpaceae III. Dacrydium bidwillii. Phytomorphology 16: 81-91.
95. _. 1966b. Gametophyte development and embryology in the Podocarpaceae VI. Dacrydium colensoi. General conclusions. Phytomorphology 16: 199-210.
96. _. 1969. Generic boundaries in the Podocarpaceae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 94: 166-172.
97. _. 1982. Taxonomy of Dacrydium Sol. ex Lamb. emend. DeLaub. (Podocarpaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 30: 311-320.
98. _. 1987. A critique of the Phyllocladaceae. Taxon 36: 559-565.
99. RAUBESON, L. A. and R. K. JANSEN. 1993. Phylogenetically informative chloroplast DNA rearrangements in the Podocarpaceae. American Journal of Botany 80 (suppl.): 173.
100. REYMANOWNA, M. 1987. A Jurassic podocarp from Poland. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 51: 133-143.
101. REYRE, Y. 1968. La sculpture de l'exine des pollens des gymnospermes et des chlamydospermes et son utilisation dans l'identification des pollen fossiles. Pollen et Spores 10: 197-220.
102. ROTHWELL, G. R. and R. SERBET. 1994. Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes: A numerical cladistic analysis. Systematic Botany 19: 443-482.
103. ROUANE, M. L., M. GONDRAN, and P. WOLTZ. 1988. Hétérocotylie et évolution cotylédonaire chez les Podocarpineae. Gaussenia 4: 7-15.
104. SAHNI, B. and A. K. MITRA. 1927. Notes on the anatomy of some New Zealand species of Dacrydium. Annals of Botany (Oxford) 41: 76-88.
105. SCHOONRAAD, E. and H. P. VAN DER SCHIFF. 1975. Distribution and some interesting morphological aspects of the South African Podocarpaceae. Boissiera 24: 135-144.
106. SCHUSTER, R. M. 1976. Plate tectonics and its bearing on the geographic origin and dispersal of the angiosperms. Pp. 38-128 in Origin and early evolution of the angiosperms, ed. C. B. Beck. New York: Columbia.
107. SINNOT, E. W. 1913. The morphology of the reproductive structures in the Podocarpineae. Annals of Botany 27: 38-82.
108. SIVAK, J. 1975. Les charactères de diagnose des grains de pollen à ballonnets. Pollen & Spores 17: 349-421.
109. SPRATT, E. R. 1912. The formation and physiological significance of root nodules in the Podocarpineae. Annals of Botany (Oxford) 26: 805-816.
110. STILES, W. 1908. The anatomy of Saxegothaea conspicua. New Phytologist 6: 209-223.
111. STOCKEY, R. A. 1991. Antarctic and Gondwana Conifers. Pp. 179-191 in Antarctic paleobiology, its role in the reconstruction of Gondwana, eds. T. N. Taylor and E. L. Taylor. New York: Springer-Verlag.
112. and H. Ko. 1988. Cuticle micromorphology of some New Caledonian podocarps. Botanical Gazette (London) 149: 240-252.
113. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
114. TENGNER, J. 1965. Dacrydium - Anatomy and taxonomy. Botaniska Notiser 118: 450-452.
115. _. 1967. Anatomy and taxonomy in the Podocarpaceae. Botaniska Notiser 120: 504-506.
116. TOMLINSON, P. B. and T. TAKASO. 1989a. Cone and ovule ontogeny in Phyllocladus (Podocarpaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 99: 209-221.
117. _ and _. 1989b. Developmental shoot morphology in Phyllocladus (Podocarpaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 99: 223-248.
118. TOWNROW, J. A. 1967a. On a conifer from the Jurassic of East Antarctica. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 101: 137-147.
119. _. 1967b. On Rissikia and Mataia, podocarpaceous conifers from the lower Mesozoic of southern lands. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 101: 103-138.
120. TRUSWELL, E. M. 1989. Cretaceous and Tertiary vegetation of Antarctica: A palynological perspective. Pp. 71-88 in Antarctic paleobiology, its role in the reconstruction of Gondwana, eds. T. N. Taylor and E. L. Taylor. New York: Springer-Verlag.
121. UENO, J. 1960. Studies on the pollen grains of Gymnospermae. Concluding remarks to the relationships between Coniferae. Journal of the Institute of Polytechnics, Osaka City University, Ser. D 11: 109-136.
122. VISHNU-MITTRE. 1959. Studies on the fossil flora of Nipania (Rajmahal Series), Bihar. Coniferales. Palaeobotany 6: 82-112.
123. WASSCHER, J. 1941. The genus Podocarpus in the Netherlands Indies. Blumea 4: 359-479.
124. WELLS, P. M. and R. S. HILL. 1989a. Fossil imbricate-leaved Podocarpaceae from Tertiary sediments in Tasmania. Australian Systematic Botany 2: 387-423.
125. _ and _. 1989b. Leaf morphology of the imbricate-leaved Podocarpaceae. Australian Systematic Botany 2: 369-386.
126. WILDE, M. H. 1944. A new interpretation of coniferous cones I. Podocarpaceae (Podocarpus). Annals of Botany (Oxford) 8: 1-41.
127. WOLTZ, P. 1987. Les Podocarpineae, étude des plantules et évolution: comparaison avec les familles de Conifères de l'hémisphère sud: Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, Taxodiaceae, Taxaceae. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 134: 141-151.
128. _ and M. L. ROUANE. 1980. A propos du Microcachrys tetragona Hook. f. (Podocarpacées) et de l'évolution vasculaire de la plantule. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 127: 151-158.
129. _ and _. 1987. Stachycarpus amara (Blume) Gaussen, Podocarpaceae d'Australasie: Aspects anatomiques et évolution de l'appareil conducteur de la plantule. Gaussenia 3: 3-11.
130. _, R. GAJARDO, and M. L. PROVANE. 1984. A propos du Saxegothaea conspicua Lindl. podocarpine endémique des Andes méridionales et de l'évolution vasculaire de la plantule. Gaussenia 1: 5-18.
131. YOUNG, M. S. 1910. The morphology of the Podocarpineae. Botanical Gazette (London) 50: 81-103.