Expertise, Subversion, and Bureaucratic Discretion

Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 536-555

  Gailmard, Sean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036392873     PISSN: 87566222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jleo/18.2.536     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Banks, Jeffrey. 1989. "Agency Budgets, Cost Information, and Auditing," 33 American Journal of Political Science 670-99.
2. Banks, Jeffrey, and Barry Weingast. 1992. "The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information," 36 American Journal of Political Science 509-24.
3. Bawn, Kathleen. 1995. "Political Control versus Expertise: Congressional Choices About Administrative Procedures," 89 American Political Science Review 62-73.
4. Bendor, Jonathan, Amihai Glazer, and Thomas Hammond. 2001. "Theories of Delegation," 4 Annual Reviews of Political Science 235-69.
5. Brehm, John, and Scott Gates. 1997. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6. deFigueiredo, Rui P., Pablo T. Spiller, and Santiago Urbiztondo. 1999. "An Informational Perspective on Administrative Procedures," 15 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 283-305.
7. Epstein, David, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1994. "Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion," 38 American Journal of Political Science 697-722.
8. _. 1995. "A Theory of Strategic Oversight: Congress, Lobbyists, and the Bureaucracy," 11 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 227-55.
9. _. 1996. "Divided Government and the Design of Administrative Procedures: A Formal Model and Empirical Test," 58 Journal of Politics 373-97.
10. _. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gailmard, Sean. 2001. "Multiple Principals, Outside Information, and Bureaucratic Policy Making," working paper, University of Chicago.
12. Glaberson, William. 1999. "Novel Antipollution Tool is Being Upset by Courts," New York Times, June 5, Al.
13. Goodnow, Frank J. 1900. Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. New York: Russell and Russell.
14. Hill, Jeffrey, and James Brazier. 1991. "Constraining Administrative Decisions: A Critical Examination of the Structure and Process Hypothesis," 7 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 373-400.
15. Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Mashaw, Jerry L. 1990. "Explaining Administrative Process: Normative, Positive, and Critical Stories of Legal Development," 6 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 267-98.
17. McCubbins, Mathew D. 1985. "The Legislative Design of Regulatory Procedure," 29 American Journal of Political Science 721-48.
18. McCubbins, Mathew D., Roger G. Noll, and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. "Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control," 3 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 243-77.
19. _. 1989. "Structure and Process, Politics and Policy," 75 Virginia Law Review 431-82.
20. _. 1999. "The Political Origins of the Administrative Procedure Act," 15 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 180-217.
21. McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. "Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols and Fire Alarms," 28 American Journal of Political Science 165-79.
22. Schick, Allen. 1983. "Politics Through Law: Congressional Limitations on Executive Discretion," in Anthony King, ed., Both Ends of the Avenue: The Presidency, the Executive Branch, and Congress in the 1980s. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research; 154-84.
23. Ting, Michael M. 2001. "The 'Power of the Purse' and its Implications for Bureaucratic Policy-Making," 106 Public Choice 243-74.
24. _. 2002. "A Theory of Jurisdictional Assignments in Bureaucracies," 46 American Journal of Political Science 364-78.
25. Wood, B. Dan, and Richard Waterman. 1994. Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role of Bureaucracy in a Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.