How involvement, citation style, and funding source affect the credibility of university scientists

Science Communication

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 72-97

  Sprecker, Kim ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036377709     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107554700202400104     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2000. A preview of AAAS report XXV: Research and development FY 2001. Retrieved 22 March 2000 from www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/rd/prev01p.htm.
2. Artz, N. 1989. Numeric and verbal information; Implications for persuasion. Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
3. Austin, E., and Q. Dong. 1994. Source v. content effects on judgments of news believability. Journalism Quarterly 71:973-83.
4. Babbie, E. 1995. The practice of social research. 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Baesler, E., and J. Burgoon. 1994. The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research 21:582-602.
6. Barnes, D., and L. Bero. 1996. Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: An analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, & Law 21:515-42.
7. Berlo, D., J. Lemert, and R. Mertz, 1970. Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly 33:563-76.
8. Birnbaum, M. 1999. How to show that 9 > 221: Collect judgements in a between-subjects design. Psychological Methods 4:243-49.
9. Blumenthal, D. 1996. Ethics issues in academic-industry relationships in the life sciences: The continuing debate. Academic Medicine 71:1291-96.
10. Brelis, M. 1998. For vast rain forests, clock's ticking. Boston Globe, 7 June, sec. E.
11. Brooks, B., G. Kennedy, D. Moen, and D. Ranly. 1999. News reporting and writing. 6th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.
12. Budiansky, S. 1993. The doomsday myths: Exaggerating environmental dangers. U.S. News & World Report 115:81-91.
13. Byrd, T., J. VanDerslice, and S. Peterson. 1997. Variation in environmental risk perceptions and information sources among three communities in El Paso. Risk: Health, Safety, & Environment 8:355-72.
14. Center for Science in the Public Interest. 2000. Canadian Food Information Council: Wolf in sheep's clothing. Retrieved 23 May 2000 from www.plant.uoguelph.ca/riskcomm/archives/fsnet-archives.htm.
15. Chaffee, S. 1986. Mass media and interpersonal channels: Competitive, convergent, or complementary? In Interimedia, 3d ed., edited by G. Gumpert and R. Cathcart, 62-80. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Chaiken, S. 1980. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:752-66.
17. _. 1987. The heuristic model of persuasion. In Social influence: The Ontario symposium, edited by M. Zanna, J. Olson, and E. Higgins, 3-39. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Charman, K. 1999. Saving the planet with pestilent statistics. PR Watch 6:1-5.
19. Chase, J., and I. Panagopoulos. 1995. Environmental values and social psychology: A European common market or commons' dilemma? In Values and the environment: A social science perspective, edited by Y. Guerrier, N. Alexander, J. Chase, and M. O'Brien, 67-80. New York: John Wiley.
20. Chechlle, R. 1991. Introduction to environmental decision making. In Environmental decision making, edited by R. Chechile and S. Carlisle, 1-13. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
21. Cohen, J. 1998. Scientists who fund themselves. Science 279:178-82.
22. Cummings, K., R. Sciandra, A. Gingrass, and R. Davis. 1991. What scientists funded by the tobacco industry believe about the hazards of cigarette smoking. American Journal of Public Health 81:894-96.
23. Davies, J. 1992. Departments of enterprise. Laboratory Practice 41:16-17.
24. Dunlap, R., and K. Van Liere. 1978. The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education 9:10-19.
25. Dunlap, R., K. Van Liere, A. Mertig, and R. Jones. 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56:425-42.
26. Durant, J. 1993. What is scientific literacy? In Science and culture in Europe, edited by J. Durant and J. Gregory, 129-36. Wilts, UK: Antony Rowe.
27. Eagly, A., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
28. Ericson, R., P. Baranek, and J. Chan. 1989. Negotiating control: A study of news sources, Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.
29. Frazier, K. 1998. Californians rate high-tech, scientists highest among all institutions. Skeptical Inquirer 22:12.
30. Freudenburg, W. 1996. Risky thinking: Irrational fears about risk and society. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 545:44-53.
31. Gaziano, C., and K. McGrath. 1986. Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly 63:451-62.
32. Gelbspan, R. 1997. The heat is on: The high-stakes battle over Earth's threatened climate. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33. Gibson, R., and J. Hester. 2000. Student understanding of the use of quotes and paraphrases. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 54:59-66.
34. Gibson, R., and D. Zillmann. 1993. The impact of quotation in news reports on issue perception. Journalism Quarterly 70:793-800.
35. _. 1998. Effects of citation in exemplifying testimony on issue perception. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 75:167-76.
36. Granberg, D. 1982. Social judgment theory. In Communication yearbook 6, edited by M. Burgoon and N. E. Doran, 304-29. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37. Grant, D. 2000. FBI leadership accused of playing to business interests. AgriNews, 21 April, sec. A.
38. Gregory, J., and S. Miller. 1998, Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility. New York: Plenum.
39. Gunther, A. 1988. Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly 65:279-87.
40. _. 1992. Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly 56:147-67.
41. Gunther, A., and D. Lasorsa. 1986. Issue importance and trust in mass media. Journalism Quarterly 63:844-48.
42. Hailey, S., K. Lawton, and R. Haines. 2000. Journalists' dilemma: Balanced communications in a volatile industry environment. Panel discussion at the meeting of the U.S. Agricultural Communicators Congress, 25 July, Washington, DC.
43. Hamilton, M. 1998. Message variables that mediate and moderate the effect of equivocal language on source credibility. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17:109-43.
44. Hammond, S. 1990. Issue involvement and the elaboration likelihood model: A field experiment using environmental risk messages. Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland-College Park.
45. Hass, R. G. 1981. Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. In Cognitive responses in persuasion, edited by R. Petty, T. Ostrom, and T. Brock, 141-72. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Hovland, C., and W. Weiss. 1951. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 15:635-50.
47. Infante, D. 1980. The construct validity of semantic differential scales for the measurement of source credibility. Communication Quarterly 28:19-26.
48. International Food Information Council Foundation. 1997. How to understand and interpret food and health-related scientific studies. Washington, DC: International Food Information Council Foundation.
49. _. 1998. Food for thought II: Reporting on diet, nutrition and food safety during May-July 1997. Washington, DC: International Food Information Council Foundation.
50. Jardine, C., N. Gibson, and S. Hrudey. 1999. Detection of odour and health risk perception of drinking water. Water Science & Technology 40:91-98.
51. Jo, S., and L. Rodriguez. 1999. The sources Iowans trust: The impact of involvement on credibility perceptions and channels used for environmental issues. Paper presented at the meeting of the Agricultural Communicators in Education/National Extension Technology Committee, 11 June, Knoxville, TN.
52. Johnson, B., and A. Eagly. 1989. The effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 106:290-314.
53. Johnson, B., P. Sandman, and P. Miller. 1992. Testing the role of technical information in public risk perception. Risk: Issues in Health & Safety 3:341-64.
54. Jilngermann, H., H. Pfister, and K. Fischer. 1996. Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis 16:251-61.
55. Kazoleas, D. 1993. A comparison of the persuasive effectiveness of qualitative versus quantitative evidence: A test of exploratory hypotheses. Communication Quarterly 41:40-50.
56. Kempton, W., J. Hoster, and J. Hartley. 1995. Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Kerlinger, F. 1986. Foundations of behavioral research. 3d ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
58. Kopfman, J., S. Smith, J. Ah Yun, and A. Hodges. 1998. Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages. Journal of Applied Communication Research 26:279-300.
59. Krimsky, S., L. S. Rothenberg, P. Stott, and G. Kyle. 1998. Scientific Journals and their authors' financial interests: A pilot study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 67:194-201.
60. Luchok, J., and J. McCroskey. 1978. The effect of quality of evidence on attitude change and source credibility. Southern Speech Communication Journal 43:371-83.
61. Marquart J., G. O'Keefe, and A. Gunther. 1995. Believing in biotech: Farmers' perceptions of the credibility of BGH information sources. Science Communication 16:388-402.
62. McCallum, D., S. Hammond. and V. Covello. 1991. Communicating about environmental risks: How the public uses and perceives information sources. Health Education Quarterly 18:349-61.
63. McCroskey, J., P. Hamilton, and A. Weiner. 1974. The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research 1:42-52.
64. McCroskey, J., and T. Young. 1981. Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal 32:25-34.
65. McGinnies, E., and C. Ward. 1980. Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6:467-72.
66. McNutt.K. 1999. Conflict of interest Journal of the American Dietetic Association 99:29-30.
67. Medicine's rude awakening to the commercial world. 2000. Lancet 355:857.
68. Mercola, J. 2001. Suppressing dissent in science with GM foods. Retrieved 15 March 2001 from www.plant.uoguelph.ca/safefood/archives/agnet/2001/3-2001/ag-03-16-01-01.txt.
69. Metzler, K. 1979. Newsgathering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70. Meyer, P. 1988. Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly 65:567-74, 588.
71. Milbrath, L. 1994. Stumbling blocks to a sustainable society: Incoherences in key premises about the way the world works. Futures 26:117-24.
72. Mowen, J., J. Wiener, and S. Joag. 1987. An information integration analysis of how trust and expertise combine to influence source credibility and persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research 14:564.
73. Murphy, E. 1999. Most people distrust government on food safety "truth." PA News, 2-3. Retrieved 22 November 1999 from www.extension.iastate.edu/files/fscurrent/.
74. Ohanian, R. 1990. Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising 19:39-52.
75. Orr, D. 1992. Ecological literacy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
76. Paisley, W. 1998. Scientific literacy and the competition for public attention and understanding. Science Communication 20:70-80.
77. Park, R., and U. Goodenough. 1996. The unmaking of American science policy: The end of the scientific era? Academe 82:12-15.
78. Peters, R. 1996. A study of the factors determining perceptions of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: The importance of overcoming negative stereotypes. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 68:442-47.
79. Peters, R., V. Covello, and D. McCallum, 1997. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis 17:43-55.
80. Petty, R., and J. Cacioppo. 1981. Altitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
81. Power analysis for ANOVA designs. 2000. Retrieved 14 October 2000 from www.math. yorku.ca/SCS/Demos/power.
82. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 4th ed. 1994. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
83. Reichhardt, T. 1997. Science advisers face "credibility crisis." Nature 385:284.
84. Renn, O. 1991. Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. In Communicating risks to the public, edited by R. Kasperson and P. Stallen, 287-324. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
85. Rothman, K. 1993. Conflict of interest: The new McCarthyism in science. Journal of the American Medical Association 269:2782-84.
86. Salmon, C. 1987. Perspectives on involvement in consumer and communication research. In Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 7, edited by B. Dervin and M. Voigt, 244-68. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
87. Self, C. 1996. Credibility. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research, edited by M. Salwen and D. Stacks, 421-41. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
88. Sereno, K. 1968. Ego-involvement, high source credibility, and response to a belief-discrepant communication. Speech Monographs 35:476-81.
89. Sherif, C., M. Sherif, and R. Nebergall. 1965. Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
90. Sherif, M., and C. Sherif. 1967. Attitude as the individual's own categories: The Social Judgment-Involvement approach to attitude and attitude change. In Attitude, ego-involvement, and change, edited by C. Sherif and M. Sherif, 105-39. New York: John Wiley.
91. Short, J., Jr. 1994. Trace substances, science, and law: Perspectives from the social sciences. Risk: Health, Safety, & Environment 5:319-35.
92. Sigurdson, C., and T. Knecht. 1999. The academy and biotechnology. Signals 10:1, 6.
93. Slater, M. 1997. Persuasion processes across receiver goals and message genres. Communication Theory 7:125-48.
94. Slater, M., and D. Rouner, 1996a. How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 73:974-91.
95. _. 1996b. Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Communication Research 23:210-35.
96. Slovic, P. 1986. Informing and educating the public about risk. Risk Analysis 6:403-15.
97. _. 1993. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis 13:675-82.
98. Soden, D. 1995. Trust in sources of technical information. Journal of Environmental Education 26:16-20.
99. Soden, D., and J. Conary. 1991. Trust in sources of technical information among environmental professionals. Environmental Professional 13:363-69.
100. Steel, B., N. Lovrich, and J. Pierce. 1992-1993. Trust in natural resource information sources and postmaterialist values: A comparative study of U.S. and Canadian citizens in the Great Lakes area. Journal of Environmental Systems 22:123-36.
101. Stern, P., and T. Dietz, 1994. The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues 50:65-84.
102. Stern, P., T. Dietz, and G. Guagnano. 1995. The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment & Behavior 27:723-43.
103. Stern, P., T. Dietz, L. Kalof, and G. Guagnano. 1995. Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25:1611-36.
104. Sternthal, B., R. Dholakia, and C. Leavitt. 1978. The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research 4:252-60.
105. Trettin, L., and C. Musham. 2000. Is trust a realistic goal of environmental risk communication? Environment & Behavior 32:410-26.
106. Trumbo, C., K. Sprecker, R. Dumlao, G. W. Yun, and S. Duke. 2001. Use of e-mail and the Web by science writers. Science Communication 22:347-78.
107. Vestal, T., and G. Briers. 1999. Metro news journalists critique food biotechnology. Journal of Applied Communications 83:22-34.
108. Ward, H. 1985. Professional newswriting. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
109. Warren, J. 2000. California and the West; Lake Tahoe "gravely imperiled" by algae growth, scientists say. Los Angeles Times, 16 February, sec. A.
110. Weaver, D., W. Hopkins, W. Billings, and R. Cole. 1974, Quotes vs. paraphrases in writing: Does it make a difference to readers? Journalism Quarterly 51:400-404.
111. Westley, B., and W. Severin. 1964. Some correlates of media credibility. Journalism Quarterly 41:325-35.
112. Wiener, J., and J. Mowen. 1986. Source credibility: On the independent effects of trust and expertise. Advances in Consumer Research 13:306-10.
113. Wilkie, T. 1996. Sources in science: Who can we trust? Lancet 347:1308-11.
114. Zimmerman, L., P. Kendall, M. Stone, and T. Hoban. 1994. Consumer knowledge and concern about biotechnology and food safety. Food Technology 48:71-77.