Enhancing political participation in democracies: What is the role of social capital?

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 437-460

  Krishna, Anirudh ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036259263     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414002035004003     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1965). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Boston: Little, Brown.
2. Baden-Powell, B. H. (1970). The origin and growth of village communities in India. London: Scribner. (Original work published 1899)
3. Bennett, S. E., & Bennett, L.L.M. (1986). Political participation. In Samuel Long (Ed.), Annual review of political science (Vol. 1, pp. 85-103). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Berman, S. (1997a). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics, 49, 401-429.
5. Berman, S. (1997b). Civil society and political institutionalization. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 562-574.
6. Bratton, M. (1999). Political participation in a new democracy: Institutional considerations from Zambia. Comparative Political Studies, 32, 549-588.
7. Bunce, V. J. (1999). The return of the left and the future of democracy in central and eastern Europe. In B. Yesilada (Ed.), Political parties: Essays in honor of Samuel Elderseld (pp. 151-176). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
9. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Davidson, B. (1992). The black man'S burden: Africa and the curse of the nation state. New York: Times Books.
11. Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (1995). India: Economic development and social opportunity. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
12. Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties. New York: John Wiley.
13. Fisher, R. J. (1997). If rain doesn't come: An anthropological study of drought and human ecology in western Rajasthan. Delhi, India: Manohar.
14. Foster, P., & Simmons, B. (1978). Change in a Hindu village: Bhanapur in 1955, 1968, and 1973. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics.
15. Huber, E., Rueschmeyer, D., & Stephens, J. (1993). The impact of economic development on democracy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 71-85.
16. Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Jackman, R. W., & Miller, R. A. (1995). Voter turnout in the industrial democracies during the 1980s. Comparative Political Studies, 27, 467-492.
18. Jeffrey, C., & Lerche, J. (2000). Stating the difference: State, discourse, and class reproduction in Uttar Pradesh, India. Development and Change, 31, 857-878.
19. Joseph, R. (1997). Democratization in Africa after 1989: Comparative and theoretical perspectives. Comparative Politics, 29, 363-382.
20. Kohli, A. (1990). Democracy and discontent: India's growing crisis of governability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kothari, R. (1988). State against democracy: In search of humane governance. Delhi, India: Ajanta.
22. Krishna, A. (in press). Active social capital: Tracing the roots of development and democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
23. Laitin, D. (1995). The civic culture at 30. American Political Science Review, 89, 168-173.
24. Levi, M. (1996). Social and unsocial capital. Politics and Society, 24, 45-55.
25. Linz, J. (1994). Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference? In A. Valenzuela & J. Linz (Eds.), The failure of presidential democracy (pp. 3-87). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Linz, J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. New York: Doubleday.
28. Lipset, S. M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological Review, 59, 1-22.
29. Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. (1995). Introduction: Party systems in Latin America. In S. Mainwaring & T. Scully (Eds.), Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America (pp. 1 -34). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Mitra, S. K. (1991). Room to maneuver in the middle: Local elites, political action, and the state in India. World Politics, 43, 390-413.
32. Mitra, S. K. (1992). Power, protest, and participation: Local elites and the politics of development in India. London: Routledge.
33. Moore, B. (1966), Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modem world. Boston: Beacon.
34. Mukherjee, R. (1923). Democracies of the east. London: P. S. King.
35. Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 575-586.
36. Ost, D. (1995). Labor, class, and democracy: Shaping political antagonisms in postcommunist society. In B. Crawford (Ed.), Markets, stales, and democracy: The political economy of postcommunist transformation (pp. 77-203). Boulder, CO: Westview.
37. Pieterse, J. N. (in press). Participatory democracy reconceived. Futures.
38. Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Putnam, R. (1995, January). Bowling alone: America'S declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, pp. 65-78.
40. Putnam, R. (1996, Winter). The strange disappearance of civic America. American Prospect, pp. 34-48.
41. Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42. Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43. Reddy, G. R., & Haragopal, G. (1985). The Pyraveerkar: The "fixer" in rural India. Asian Survey, 25, 1147-1162.
44. Rosenstone, S., & Hansen, J. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
45. Seligson, A. L. (1999). Civic association and democratic participation in Central America: A test of the Putnam thesis. Comparative Political Studies, 32, 342-362.
46. Singh, R. (1988). Land, power, and people: Rural elite in transition, 1801-1970. New Delhi, India: Sage.
47. Srinivas, M. N. (1987). The Indian village: Myth and reality. In M. N. Srinivas (Ed.), The dominant caste and other essays (pp. 20-59). Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
48. Verba, S., Nie, N., & Kim, J. (1971). The modes of democratic participation: A cross-national comparison. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49. Verba, S., Nie, N., & Kim, J. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
50. Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Weiner, M. (1989). The Indian paradox: Essays in Indian politics. New Delhi, India: Sage.