Social work's legacy: Irreconcilable differences?

Clinical Social Work Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 187-198

  McLaughlin, Anne Marie ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Debate; Dual focus; Social justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036254934     PISSN: 00911674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1015297529215     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abramovitz, M. (1998). Social work and social reform: An arena of struggle. Social Work, 43(6), 512-526.
2. Black, W.G.(1991). Social work in World War I. A method lost. Social Service Review, 65(3), 379-401.
3. Dore, M.M. (1999). The retail method of social work: The role of the New York school in the development of clinical practice. Social Service Review, 73(2), 169-190.
4. Fisher, J. (1978). Effective casework practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Frank, M.G. (1979). Clinical social work: past, present, and future challenges and dilemmas. In P.L. Ewalt (Ed.), NASW conference proceedings; Toward a definition of clinical social work (pp. 13-22). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
6. Germain, C. (1969). Casework and Science: A historical encounter. In R. Robertson & R. Nee (Ed.), Theories of social casework (pp. 3-32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Goldstein, E.G. (1996). What is clinical social work? Looking back to move ahead. Clinical Social Work Journal, 24(1), 89-104.
8. Haynes, K. (1998). The one hundred year debate: Social reform versus individual treatment. Social Work, 43(6), 501-512.
9. Hiersteiner, C. & Peterson, K. (1999). "Crafting a usable past": The care-centered practice narrative in social work. Affila, 14(2), 144-161.
10. Hollis, F. (1969). The psychosocial approach to the practice of casework. In R.W. Roberts & R.H. Nee (Ed.), Theories of Social Casework (pp. 33-76). Washington, DC: University of Chicago Press.
11. Margolin, L. (1997). Under the cover of kindness: The invention of social work. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
12. Reisch, M. (1998, June). The sociopolitical context and social work method, 1890-1950. Social Service Review, 72(2), 163-181.
13. Richmond, M. (1917). Social diagnosis. In L. Leighninger (Ed.) (2000), Creating a new profession; The beginnings of social work education in the United States (pp. 66-85). Alexandria, A: Council on Social Work Education.
14. Sachs, J. & Newdom, F. (1999). Clinical work and social action: An integrative approach. New York: Haworth Press.
15. Shoemaker, L. (1998, June). Early conflicts in social work education. Social Service Review, 72(2), 182-191.
16. Smalley, R. (1969). The functional approach to casework. In R. Roberts & R. Nee (Ed.), Theories of social casework (pp. 77-128). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
17. Specht, H., & Courtney, M. (1994). Unfaithful angels; How social work has abandoned its mission. New York: The Free Press.
18. Swenson, C. (1998, November). Clinical social work's contribution to a social justice perspective. Social Work, 43(6), 527-537.
19. Szasz, T. (1967). The myth of mental illness. In T.J. Scheff (Ed.), Mental illness and social processes (pp. 242-253). New York: Harper & Row.
20. Wakefield, J.C. (1988, June). Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work part 1: Distributive justice as a conceptual framework for social work. Social Service Review, 62(2), 187-211.
21. Wakefield, J.C. (1988, September). Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work part 2: Psychotherapy and the pursuit of justice. Social Service Review, 62(3), 353-382.