Health services at the clinic level and implantable contraceptives for women

Contraception

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 97-106

  Chikamata, Davy M ^a   Miller, Suellen ^b  

^a WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^b POPULATION COUNCIL   (United States)

Author keywords

Contraceptive implants; Counseling; Quality of care; Service delivery

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; ETONOGESTREL; LEVONORGESTREL;

ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; COUNSELING; DEVICE REMOVAL; DRUG IMPLANT; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFECTION PREVENTION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT INFORMATION; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE;

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; COUNSELING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; DRUG IMPLANTS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFECTION CONTROL; LEVONORGESTREL; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINOR;

EID: 0036181408     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00280-3     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Prolonged effectiveness of Norplant capsule implants: A 7-year study
2. Why are US women not using long-acting contraceptives?
3. Norplant in the nineties: Realities, dilemnas, and missing pieces
4. Urban adolescent females' views on the implant and contraceptive decision-making: A double paradox
5. What international data tell us now
6. Norplant contraceptive acceptability among women in five Asian countries
7. The performance of levonogestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: A 5-year randomized study
8. Three countries' experience with Norplant introduction
9. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and acceptability of Norplant implants in Sri Lanka
10. Introduction of Norplant implants in four counties in rural China: A two year evaluation
11. The introduction and use of Norplant implants in Indonesia
12. Insertion and removal of Norplant contraceptive implants by physicians and non-physicians in an Indonesian clinic
13. Overview: Contraceptive research accomplishments in the 20th century and present use of contraceptives
14. Innovative technique for Norplant implants removal
15. The modified "U" technique: A refined method of Norplant removal
16. Neurovascular injury during removal of levonogestrel implants
17. A guide to removing contraceptive implants
18. Contraceptive implants: Proper technique for rapid, problem-free removal
19. The strategic approach to contraceptive introduction
20. Training for Norplant removal: Assessment of learning curves and competency
21. Materials, methods, and results of the Norplant training program
22. Research, introduction, and use: Advancing from Norplant
23. Acceptance and perceptions of Norplant among users in San Francisco, USA
24. Insertion site complications during the first year of Norplant use
25. Contraception with two levonogestrel rod implants: A five year study in the United States and Dominican Republic
26. The "U" technique: A new method for Norplant implant removal
27. A comparison of "U" and standard techniques for Norplant removal
28. The "pop-out" method of Norplant removal
29. Three-year experience with Norplant contraceptive implants in Nigeria
30. Contraceptive outcomes among adolescents prescribed Norplant implants versus oral contraceptives after one year of use
31. Comparison of continuation rates for hormonal contraception among adolescents
32. How providers restrict access to family planning methods: Results from 5 African countries
33. The Norplant debate
34. Clinical profile of implanon: A single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant