|
Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 167-172
|
Urban adolescent females' views on the implant and contraceptive decision-making: A double paradox
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ARTICLE;
CONTRACEPTION;
DECISION MAKING;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
IMPLANTATION;
INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE;
SEXUAL INTERCOURSE;
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
URBAN POPULATION;
ADOLESCENTS;
ADOLESCENTS, FEMALE;
AGE FACTORS;
AMERICAS;
ATTITUDE;
BEHAVIOR;
CALIFORNIA;
COMMUNICATION;
CONTRACEPTION;
CONTRACEPTIVE IMPLANTS;
CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS;
DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS;
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES;
FAMILY PLANNING;
KNOWLEDGE SOURCES;
MISINFORMATION;
NORTH AMERICA;
NORTHERN AMERICA;
PERCEPTION;
POPULATION;
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS;
PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS;
PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS;
RESEARCH REPORT;
UNITED STATES;
URBAN POPULATION--WOMEN;
YOUTH;
ADOLESCENT;
ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY;
CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR;
CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE;
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES;
DECISION MAKING;
DRUG IMPLANTS;
FEMALE;
FOCUS GROUPS;
HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE;
HUMANS;
LEVONORGESTREL;
MASS MEDIA;
PEER GROUP;
SAN FRANCISCO;
SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;
URBAN HEALTH;
|
EID: 0030768028
PISSN: 00147354
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/2953380 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (30)
|
References (6)
|