A Comparison of Selected Methods of Scoring Classroom Assessments

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 249-268

  Marzano, Robert J ^a,b  

^a Mid continent Research for Education and Learning   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036039272     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324818ame1503_2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Afrasian, P. W, (1994). Classroom assessment (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Austin, S., & McCann, R. (1992, March). Here's another arbitrary grade for your collection: A statewide study of grading policies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 343 944).
3. Brennan, R. L. (1992). Elements of generalitability theory. Iowa City, IA: The American College Testing Program.
4. Brookhart, S. M. (1993). Teacher's grading practices: Meaning and values. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 123-142.
5. Brookhart, S. M. (1994). Teachers' grading: Practices and theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 279-301.
6. College Board, The (1998). High school grading policies (Research notes: RN-04). Princeton, NJ: Author.
7. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
8. Cross, L. H. (1995). Grading students. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 4, 1-4.
9. Cross, L. H., & Frary, R. B. (1999). Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 53-72.
10. Frary, R. B., Cross, L. H., & Weber, L. J. (1993). Testing and grading practices and opinions of secondary teachers of academic subjects: Implications for instruction in measurement. Educational Measurement: issues and Practice, 12(3), 23-30.
11. Gadalla, T. M. (1999, April). Multiple-choice versus constructed response tests in the assessment of mathematics computation, skills. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 431 813)
12. Haladyna, T. M. (1992). The effectiveness of several multiple-choice formats. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 73-88.
13. Haladyna, T. M. (1994). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing test items to evaluate higher order thinking. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Kendall, J. S. (2000). Topics: A roadmap to standards. Bulletin, 84(620), 37-48.
16. Lane, S., Liu, M., Ankenmann, R. D., & Stone, C. A. (1996). Generalizability and validity of a mathematics performance assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 71-92.
17. Linn, R. (1994). Performance assessment: Policy promises and technical measurement standards. Educational Researcher, 23(9), 4-14.
18. McMillan, J. H. (1997). Classroom assessment: Principles and practices for effective instruction. Needham Heights, MD: Allyn & Bacon.
19. McMillan, J. H. (2001). Essential assessment concepts for teachers and administrators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
20. Nava, F. J. G., & Loyd, B. H. (1992, April). An investigation of achievement and non-achievement criteria in elementary and secondary school grading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 346 145)
21. O'Donnell, A., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1991). Elementary and secondary teachers' beliefs about testing and grading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
22. Pomplun, M., Capps, L., & Sundbye, N. (1998). Criteria teachers use to score performance items. Educational Assessment, 5, 95-110.
23. RaFoth, B. A., & Rubin, D. L. (1984). The impact of content and mechanics on judgments of writing quality. Written Communication, 1, 446-458.
24. Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110-114.
25. Shavelson, R. J., & Baxter, G. P. (1992, May). What we've learned about assessing hands-on science. Educational Leadership, 49, 20-25.
26. Shavelson, R. J., Gao, X., & Baxter, G. R. (1993). Sampling variability of performance assessments (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 361). Santa Barbara, CA: UCLA, National Center for Research in Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.
27. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922-932
29. Smith, J. K., Smith, L. E., & DeLisi, R. (2001). Natural classroom assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
30. Stiggins, R. J. (1997). Student-centered classroom assessment (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
31. Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers'hands: Investigating the practice of classroom assessment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
32. Stiggins, R.J., Frisbie, D. A., & Oriswold, P. A. (1989). Inside high school grading practices: Building a research agenda. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 8(2), 5-14.
33. Vaughan, C. (1987, March). What affects raters 'judgments ? Paper presented at the meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Atlanta, GA.
34. Wright, D., & Wiese, M. J. (1988). Teacher judgment in student evaluation: A comparison of grading methods. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 10-14.