Generalizability and validity of a mathematics performance assessment

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 71-92

  Lane, Suzanne ^a   Liu, Mei ^b   Ankenmann, Robert D ^c   Stone, Clement A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030306430     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00480.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brennan, R. L. (1983). Elements of generalizability theory. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
2. California State Department of Education. (1989). A question of thinking: A first look at students' performance on open-ended questions in mathematics. Sacramento, CA: Author.
3. Crick, J. E., & Brennan, R. L. (1983). Manual for GENOVA: A GEneralized analysis Of VAriance system (ACT Technical Bulletin, No. 43). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
4. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurement. New York: Wiley.
5. Dunbar, S. B., Koretz, D. M., & Hoover, H. D. (1991). Quality control in the development and use of performance assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 289-304.
6. Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-42.
7. Hieronymus, A. N., & Hoover, H. D. (1987). Iowa tests of basic skills: Writing supplement teacher's guide. Chicago: Riverside.
8. Lane, S. ( 1993). The conceptual framework for the development of a mathematics performance assessment instrument. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 16-23.
9. Lane, S., & Sabers, D. (1989). Use of generalizability theory for estimating the dependability of a scoring system for sample essays. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 195-205.
10. Lane, S., Stone, C. A., Ankenmann, R. D., & Liu, M. (1994). Reliability and validity of a mathematics performance assessment. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 247-262.
11. Linn, R. L. (1993). Educational assessment: Expanded expectations and challenges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 1-16.
12. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21.
13. Mehrens, W. A. (1992). Using performance assessment for accountability purposes. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11, 3-9, 20.
14. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-104). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
15. Messick, S. (1992). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments (Research Rep. No. RR-92-39). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
17. SAS Institute. (1990). SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 6, GLM-VARCOMP (4th ed., Vol. 2). Cary, NC: Author.
18. Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessment in science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 347-362.
19. Silver, E. A. (1991). Quantitative understanding: Amplifying student achievement and reasoning. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research and Development Center.