Phylogeny based on whole genome as inferred from complete information set analysis

Journal of Biological Physics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 439-447

  Li, W ^a   Fang, W ^b   Ling, L ^a   Wang, J ^a   Xuan, Z ^a   Chen, R ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Comparative genomics; Information discrepancy; Molecular evolution; Sequence analysis

Indexed keywords

RNA 16S;

ARCHAEBACTERIUM; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENETICS; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YEAST;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA;

EID: 0036034976     PISSN: 00920606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020316706928     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Koonin, E.V.: The emerging paradigm and open problems in comparative genomics, Bioinformatics 15 (1999), 265-266.
2. Woese, C.R., Kandler, O. and Wheelis, M.L.: Towards a natural system of organisms: Proposal for the domains archaea, bacteria, and eucarya, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87 (1990), 4576-4579.
3. Doolittle, W.F. and Logsdon, J.M., Jr.: Archaeal genomics: do archaea have a mixed heritage? Curr. Biol. 8 (1998), R209-211.
4. Woese, C.: The universal ancestor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998), 6854-6859.
5. Nomura, M.: Engineering of bacterial ribosomes: Replacement of all seven escherichia coli rRNA operons by a single plasmid-encoded operon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999), 1820-1822.
6. Pennisi, E.: Is it time to uproot the tree of life? Science 284 (1999), 1305-1307.
7. Boore, J.L. and Brown, W.M.: Big trees from little genomes: Mitochondrial gene order as a phylogenetic tool, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8 (1998), 668-674.
8. Snel, B., Bork, P. and Huynen, M.A.: Genome phylogeny based on gene content, Nat. Genet. 21 (1999), 108-110.
9. Lin, J. and Gerstein, M.: Whole-genome trees based on the occurrence of folds and orthologs: Implications for comparing genomes on different levels, Genome Res. 10 (2000), 808-818.
10. Brown, J.R., Douady, C.J., Italia, M.J., Marshall, W.E. and Stanhope, M.J.: Universal Trees based on Large Combined Protein Sequence Data Sets, Nat. Genet. 28 (2001), 281-285.
11. Li, M. et al.: An Information-Based Sequence Distance and its Application to Whole Mitochondrial Genome Phylogeny, Bioinformatics 17 (2001), 149-154.
12. Hariri, A., Weber, B. and Olmsted, J.: 3rd. On the Validity of Shannon-Information Calculations for Molecular Biological Sequences, J. Theor. Biol. 147 (1990), 235-254.
13. Fang, W.W.: The Characterization of a Measure of Information Discrepancy, Information 125 (2000), 207-252.
14. Fang, W.W.: On a global optimization problem in the study of information discrepancy, J. Global Optimization 11 (1997), 387-408.
15. Kullback, S.: Information Theory and Statistics, Wiley, New York, 1959.
16. Saitou, N. and Nei, M.: The Neighbor-Joining Method: A new Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees, Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987), 406-425.
17. Efron, B., Halloran, E. and Holmes, S.: Bootstrap Confidence Levels for Phylogenetic Trees, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996), 13429-13434.
18. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J.: CLUSTAL W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice, Nucleic Acids Res. 22 (1994), 4673-4680.
19. Hillis, D.M., Huelsenbeck, J.P. and Swofford, D.L.: Hobgoblin of phylogenetics? Nature 369 (1994), 363-364.
20. Russo, C.A., Takezaki, N. and Nei, M.: Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny, Mol. Biol. Evol. 13 (1996), 525-536.