Learning and re-learning regime support: The dynamics of post-communist regimes

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 5-36

  Mishler, William ^a   Rose, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036001492     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00002     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Achen, C.H. (1982). Interpreting and using regression. Sage Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-029. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Almond, G.A. & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Anderson, C.J. & O'Connor, K.M. (2000). System change, learning and public opinion about the economy. British Journal of Political Science 30(1): 147-172.
4. Bahry, D. (1999). Comrades into citizens? Russian political culture and public support for the transition. Slavic Review 58(4): 841-53.
5. Barany, Z. & Volgyes, I. (eds.) (1995). The legacies of communism in Eastern Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Berglund, S. & Aarebrot, F. (1997). The political history of Eastern Europe in the 20th century. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
7. Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty, in Four essays on liberty. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 118-172.
8. Burkhart, R.E. & Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1994). Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis. American Political Science Review 88(4): 903-910.
9. Collier, D. & Levitsky, S. (1996). Democracy with adjective: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. Notre Dame, IN: Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies Working Paper No. 230.
10. Conover, P.J. & Searing, D.D. (1994). Democracy, citizenship and the study of political socialization, in I. Budge & D. McKay (eds.), Democracy and citizenship. London: Sage, pp. 24-55.
11. Dahl, R.A. (1998). On democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
13. Easton, D. & Dennis, J. (1969). Children in the political sysem: Origins of political legitimacy. New York: McGraw Hill.
14. EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development) (2001). Transition report update. London: EBRD, April.
15. Eckstein, H. (1998). Congruence theory explained, in H. Eckstein, F.J. Fleron, Jr, E.P. Hoffmann & W.M. Reisinger (1998). Can democracy take root in post-Soviet Russia? Explorations in state-society relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 3-34.
16. Eisenstadt, T. (2000). Eddies in the third wave: Protracted transitions and theories of democratization. Democratization 7(3): 2-24.
17. Feng, Y. (1997). Democracy, political stability and economic growth. British Journal of Political Science 27(3): 391-18.
18. Fiorina, M.P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Freedom House (annual). http://www.freedomhouse.org.
20. Gibson, J.L. (1996). Political and economic markets. Journal of Politics 58(4): 954-84.
21. Jowitt, K. (1992). New world disorder: The Leninist extinction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22. Keenan, E. (1986). Muscovite political folkways. The Russian Review 45: 115-181.
23. Kinder, D. & Kiewiet, D.R. (1979). Economic discontent and political behavior. American Journal of Political Science 23: 281-325.
24. Kornai, J. (1992). The socialist economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Kornberg, A. & Clarke H. 1992. Citizens and community: Political support in a representative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Leblang, D.A. (1997). Political democracy and economic growth: Pooled cross-sectional and time-series evidence. British Journal of Political Science 27(3): 453-66.
27. Linz, J.J. (2000). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
28. Lipset, S.M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological Review 59(1): 1-22.
29. MacKuen, M.B., Erickson, R.S. & Stimson, J.A. (1992). Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. economy. American Political Science Review 86: 597-611.
30. Mason, D.S. (1985). Public opinion and political change in Poland, 1980-1982. New York:Cambridge University Press.
31. Millar, J.R. (ed.) (1987). Politics, work and daily life in the USSR:A survey of former Soviet citizens. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Mishler, W. & Rose, R. (1997). Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. Journal of Politics 50: 418-51.
33. Mishler, W. & Rose, R. (2001). Political support for incomplete democracies: Realist vs. idealist theories and measures. International Political Science Review 22(4): 303-20.
34. Newton, K. (1999). Social and political trust in estabhshed democracies, in P. Norris (ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 169-187.
35. Page, B.I. & Shapiro, R.Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in American policy preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Putin, V. (2000). First person. London: Hutchinson.
38. Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R.Y. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Roeder, P.G. (1999). Peoples and states after 1989: The political costs of incomplete national revolutions. Slavic Review 59(4): 854-82.
40. Rogowski, R. (1974). Rational legitimacy:A theory of political support. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Rose, R. (1999). New Russia Barometer trends since 1992. Studies in Public Policy No. 320. Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde.
42. Rose, R. (2000a). New Baltic Barometer IV: A survey study. Studies in Public Policy No. 338. Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde.
43. Rose, R. (2000b.) Uses of social capital in Russia: Modern, pre-modern and anti-modern. Post-Soviet Affairs 16(1): 33-57.
44. Rose, R. & Haerpfer, C. (1998). Trends in democracies and markets: New democracies Barometer, 1991-1998. Studies in Public Policy No. 308. Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde.
45. Rose, R., Mishler, W. & Haerpfer, C. (1998). Democracy and its alternatives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46. Rose, R. & Shin, D.C. (2001). Democratization backwards: The problem of third-wave democracies. British Journal of Political Science 31(2): 331-54.
47. Shlapentokh, V. (1989). Public and private life of the Soviet people. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Simon, J. (1998). Popular conceptions of democracy in postcommunist Europe. in S.H. Barnes & J. Simon (eds.) The postcommunist citizen. Budapest: Erasmus Foundation and Institute for Political Science, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp. 79-116.
49. Weatherford, M.S. (1987). How does government performance influence political support? Political Behavior 9(1): 5-28.
50. Wedel, J.R. (1986). The private Poland. New York: Facts on File.
51. Weil, F.D. (1989). The sources and structure of legitimation in Western democracies. American Sociological Review 54(4): 682-706.