Choice between non-equity entry modes: An organizational capability perspective

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 223-242

  Erramilli, M Krishna ^a   Agarwal, Sanjeev ^b   Dev, Chekitan S ^c  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c 335 Statler Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035997993     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Agarwal, Sanjeev. 1994. Sociocultural Distance and the Choice of Joint Ventures: A Contingency Perspective.Journal of International Marketing, 2(2): 63-80.
2. Agarwal, Sanjeev &Sridhar N. Ramaswami. 1992. Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location, and Internalization Factors.Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1): 1-27.
3. Anderson, Erin &Hubert Gatignon. 1986. Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions.Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (Fall): 1-26.
4. Armstrong, Scott J. &Terry S. Overton. 1977. Estimating Non-Response in Mailed Surveys.Journal of Marketing Research,14(August): 396-402.
5. Arora, Ashish &Andrea Fosfuri. 2000. Wholly-owned Subsidiary Versus Technology Licensing in the Worldwide Chemical Industry.Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4): 555-572.
6. Barney, Jay. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.Journal of Management,17(March): 99-120.
7. Brouthers, Keith D. &Lance Eliot Brouthers. 2001. Explaining the National Cultural Distance Paradox.Journal of International Business Studies,32(1): 177-189.
8. Chandler, Gaylen N. &Steven H. Hanks. 1994. Market Attractiveness, Resource-based Capabilities, Venture Strategies, and Venture Performance.Journal of Business Venturing,9(July): 331-349.
9. Chang, Sea Jin. 1995. International Expansion Strategy of Japanese Firms: Capability Building Through Sequential Entry.Academy of Management Journal38(2): 383-407.
10. Cohen Wesley M. &Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly,35: 128-152.
11. Collis, David J. &Cynthia A. Montgomery. 1995. Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s.Harvard Business Review, (July-August): 118-128.
12. 4Journal of International Marketing, 6(2): 28-53.
13. Contractor, Farok J. &Sumit K. Kundu 1998b. Modal Choice ina World of Alliances: Analyzing Organizational Forms in the International Hotel Sector.Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2): 325-358.
14. Dunning, John H. 1988.Explaining International Production.London: Unwin Hyman.
15. Erramilli, M. Krishna. 1990. Entry Mode Choice in Service Industries.International Marketing Review,7(5): 50-62.
16. Erramilli, M. Krishna 1996. Nationality and SubsidiaryOwnership Patterns in Multinational Corporations.Journal of International Business Studies,27(2): 225-248.
17. Erramilli, M. Krishna& C.P. Rao. 1993. Service Firms’International Entry Mode-choice: A Modified Transaction-Cost Analysis Approach.Journal of Marketing,5 7 (July): 19-38.
18. Fladmoe-Lindquist, Karin &Laurent L. Jacque. 1995. Control Modes in International Service Operations: The Propensity to Franchise.Management Science,41(7): 1238-49.
19. Gatignon, Hubert &Erin Anderson. 1988. The Multinational Corporations’ Degree of Control over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation.Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,4(2): 305-336.
20. Gomes-Casseres, Benjamin. 1989. Ownership Structures of Foreign Subsidiaries.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,11: 1-25.
21. Hennart, Jean-Francois. 1987. A Transaction Costs Theory of Equity Joint Ventures.Strategic Management Journal.9: 361-374.
22. Hu, Yao-Su. 1995. The International Transferability of the Firm’s Advantages.California Management Review,37(4): 73-88.
23. Kogut, Bruce &Udo Zander. 1993. Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation.Journal of International Business Studies,24(4): 625-646.
24. Lam, Alice. 1997. Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures.Organization Studies,18(6): 973-996.
25. Madhok, Anoop. 1997. Cost, Value and Foreign Market Entry Mode: TheTransaction and the Firm.Strategic Management Journal.18: 39-61.
26. ndEdition. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
27. Pan, Yigang &David Tse. 2000. The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes.Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4): 535-554.
28. Root, Franklin R. 1994.Entry Strategies For International Markets.New York: Lexington Books.
29. Shane, Scott A. 1996. Hybrid Organizational Arrangements and Their Implications for Firm Growth and Survival: A Study of New Franchisers.Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 216-234.
30. Shenkar, Oded. 2001. Cultural Distance Revisited: Towards a More Rigorous Conceptualization and Measurement of Cultural Differences.Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519-535.
31. Teece, David J. 1998. Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets.California Management Review.40(3): 55-79.
32. Tse, David K., Yigang Pan, &Kevin Y. Au. 1997. How MNCs Choose Entry Modes and Form Alliances: The China Experience.Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4): 779-805.