Gaining and seeking access: The European adaptation of domestic interest associations

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 585-612

  Beyers, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035994924     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00023     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Beyers, J. (1998). Permissieve consensus, maatschappelijk debat en het draagvlak van de Europese Unie. Res Publica XL: 247-272.
2. Beyers, J. & Kerremans, B. (2001). Diverging images of consensus: Belgium and its views on European integration, in K. Goldmann & K. Gilland (eds.), Nationality versus Europeanisation: The national view of the nation in four EU countries. Stockholm: University of Stockholm Department of Political Science, pp. 126-165.
3. Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The Logic of Access. Journal of European Public Policy 9.
4. Bursens, P. (1998). Het (Belgisch) middenveld en de Europese beleidsvorming: institutionele factoren binnen een meerlagig systeem. Res Publica XL: 231-246.
5. Coen, D. (1998). The European business interest and the nation state: Large-firm lobbying in the European Union and Member States. Journal of Public Policy 18: 75-100.
6. Coleman, W.D. & Perl, A. (1999). Internationalized policy environments and policy network analysis. Political Studies XLVII: 691-709.
7. Dunleavy, P. (1988). Group identities and individual influence: Reconstructing the theory of interest groups. British Journal of Political Science 18: 21-49.
8. Ebbinghaus, B. (1996). Spiegelwelten: Vergleich und Mehrebenenanalyse in der Europaforschung. in T. König, E. Rieger & H. Schmitt (eds.), Das europäische Mehrebenensystem. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, pp. 405-428.
9. Eising, R. (2001). The access of business associations to the European Commission: French, German, British and EU associations in a multi-level system. Paper presented at the ECSA International Conference, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, May-June.
10. Fairbrass, J. & Jordon, A. (2001). Protecting biodiversity in the European Union: National barriers and European opportunities. Journal of European Public Policy 8: 499-518.
11. Green, D.E. & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12. Green-Cowles, M. (1998). The changing architecture of big business. in J. Greenwood & M. Aspinwall (eds.), Collective action in the European Union. London: Routledge, pp. 108-125.
13. Greenwood, J. (1997). Representing interests in the European Union. London: MacMillan.
14. Greenwood, J. & Aspinwall, M. (1998). Collective action in the European Union: Interests and the new politics of associability. London: Routledge.
15. Jordan, G. (1996). How bumble-bees fly: Accounting for public interest participation. Political Studies 44: 668-685.
16. Jordan, G. (1998). What drives associability at the European level? The limits of the utilitarian explanation. in J. Greenwood & M. Aspinwall (eds.), Collective action in the European Union. London: Routledge, pp. 31-62.
17. Keck, M.E. & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18. Kerremans, B. (2000). Intergovernmentalism and coordination of Belgium's EU policies. in H. Kassim, G.V. Peters & V. Wright (eds.), The national coordination of EU policy. London: Longman, pp. 182-200.
19. Kerremans, B. & Beyers, J. (1998). Belgium: The dilemma between cohesion and autonomy. in B. Soetendorpf & K. Hanf (eds.), Small states and the European Union. London: Longman, pp. 14-35.
20. Key, V.O. (1952). Politics, parties, and pressure groups. New York: Crowell.
21. Knoke, D. (1990). Organizing for collective action: The political economies of associations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
22. Knoke, D., Pappi, F.U., Broadbent, J. & Tsujinaka, Y. (1996). Comparing policy networks: Labor politics in the US, Germany and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kohler-Koch, B. (1997). Organized interests in EC and the European Parliament. European Integration Online Papers 1: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-009a.htm.
24. Kohler-Koch, B., et al. (1998). Interaktive Politik. Regionen im Netzwerk der europäischen Integration. Opladen: Leske Verlag.
25. Laumann, E.O. & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
26. Marks, G. (1996). An actor-centred approach to multi-level governance. Journal of Regional and Federal Studies 6: 20-38.
27. Marks, G., Hooghe, L. & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980's: State-centric v. multilevel governance. Journal of Common Market Studies 34: 341-378.
28. Marks, G. & McAdam, D. (1996). Social movements and the changing structure of political opportunity in the European Union. in G. Marks, et al. (eds.), Governance in the European Union. London: Sage, pp. 95-120.
29. Mazey, S. & Richardson, J. (1993). Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the Single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community. International Organisation 45: 651-688.
31. Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31: 473-524.
32. Moravcsik, A. (1999). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. London: ULC Press.
33. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Pappi, F.U. & Henning, C.H.C.A. (1999). The organisation of influence on the EC's common agricultural policy: A network approach. European Journal of Political Research 36: 257-281.
35. Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13: 475-499.
36. Pollack, M.A. (1997). Representing diffuse interests in EC policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy 4: 572-590.
37. Putnam, R.D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42: 427-460.
38. Reising, U.K.H., Francisco, R.A. & Huxtable, P.A. (1997). Changing methods of data collection on domestic conflict. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Toronto, Canada.
39. Risse-Kappen, T. (1997). Bringing transnational relations back in: Introduction. in T. Risse-Kappen (ed.), Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-33.
40. Scharpf, F.W. (1996). Negative and positive integration in the political economy of European welfare states, in G. Marks, et al. (eds.), Governance in the European Union. London: Sage, pp. 15-39.
41. Sidenius, N.C. (1999). Business, governance structures and the EU: The case of Denmark. in B. Kohler-Koch & R. Eising (eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union. London: Routledge, pp. 173-188.
42. Streeck, W. (1996). Neo-voluntarism: A new European social policy regime, in G. Marks, et al. (eds.), Governance in the European Union. London: Sage, pp. 64-94.
43. Swanborn, P.G. (1982). Schaaltechnieken. Theorie en parktijk van acht eenvoudige procedures. Boom: Boompers.
44. Tarrow, S. (1995). The Europeanisation of conflict: Reflections from a social movement perspective. West European Politics 18: 223-251.
45. Van Aelst, P. & Walgrave, S. (1999). Betogen in de jaren negentig: een analyse op basis van nationale pers en rijkswachtarchieven in Belgie. Res Publica XLI: 41-64.
46. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1998). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Wessels, B. (1999). The European Parliament and interest groups, in R.S. Katz & B. Wessels (eds.), The European Parliament, the national parliaments, and European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105-128.