Representing diffuse interests in ec policy-making

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 575-590

  Pollack, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer protection; Diffuse interests; EC institutions; Environment; Women s rights

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031488321     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135017697344073     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arp, Henning A. (1992) ‘The European Parliament in European Community environmental policy’, EUI Working Paper EPU No. 92/13.
2. Commission of the European Communities (1996) Directory of Community Legislation in Force, Volume 1: Analytical Register, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
3. Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General XXIV, Consumer Protection (1996) Inventory of Acts Relating to Consumer Affairs, special issue of Euro-C, March.
4. Cram, Laura (1993) ‘Calling the tune without paying the piper? Social policy regulation: the role of the Commission in European Union social policy’, Policy and Politics 21(2): 135–46.
5. Cram, Laura (1994) ‘The European Commission as a multi-organization: social policy and IT policy in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 1(2): 195–217.
6. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter (1987) ‘How flexible is Community law? An unusual approach to the concept of “two speeds” ’, Michigan Law Review 82: 1274–93.
7. Elman, R. Amy (ed.) (1996) Sexual Politics and the European Union, Providence: Berghahn Books.
8. Goetz, Kirstin (1995) ‘The EP: European parliament or environment parliament’, unpublished paper, University of Wisconsin, December.
9. Golub, Jonathan (1996) ‘State power and institutional influence in European integration: lessons from the Packaging Waste Directive’, Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3) (September): 313–39.
10. Haigh, Nigel (1987) EEC Environmental Policy and Britain, London: Longman.
11. Hildebrand, Philip M. (1992) ‘The European Community’s environmental policy, 1957 to“1992”: from incidental measures to an international regime?’, in David Judge (ed.), A Green Dimension for the European Community: Political Issues and Processes, London: Frank Cass, pp. 13–44.
12. Hoskyns, Catherine (1991) ‘The European women’s lobby’, Feminist Review 38 (Summer): 67–70.
13. Hoskyns, Catherine (ed.) (1996) Integrating Gender: Women, Law and Politics in the European Union, London: Verso.
14. Johnson, Stanley and Corcelle, Guy (1995) The Environmental Policy of the European Communities, 2nd edn, Boston: Kluwer Law International.
15. Judge, David (1993) ‘ “Predestined to save the earth”: the Environment Committee of the European Parliament’, in David Judge (ed.), A Green Dimension for the European Community: Political Issues and Processes, London: Frank Cass, pp. 186–212.
16. Kendall, Vivienne (1994) EC Consumer Law, Colorado Springs: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Krämer, Ludwig (1993) European Environmental Law Casebook, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
18. Leibfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul (eds) (1995) European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
19. Maier, Lothar (1993) ‘Institutional consumer representation in the European Community’, Journal of Consumer Policy 16(3–4): 355–74.
20. Majone, Giandomenico (1994) The European Community as a Regulatory State, lectures given at the Academy of European Law, European University Institute.
21. Marks, Gary, Scharpf, Fritz W., Schmitter, Philippe C. and Streeck, Wolfgang (1996) Governance in the European Union, London: Sage Publications.
22. Mazey, Sonia (1995) ‘The development of EU equality policies: bureaucratic expansion on behalf of women?’, Public Administration 73 (Winter): 591–609.
23. Mazey, Sonia and Richardson, Jeremy (1993) ‘Environmental groups and the EC: challenges and opportunities’, in David Judge (ed.), A Green Dimension for the European Community: Political Issues and Processes, London: Frank Cass, pp. 109–28.
24. Melnick, R. Shep (1983) Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
25. Micklitz, Hans W. and Weatherill, Stephen (1993) ‘Consumer policy in the European Community: before and after Maastricht’, Journal of Consumer Policy 16(3–4): 285–321.
26. Olson, Mancur (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Ostner, Ilona and Lewis, Jane (1995) ‘Gender and the evolution of European social policies’, in Stephan Leibfried and Paul Pierson (eds), European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
28. Pollack, Mark A. (1996) ‘The new institutionalism and EC governance: the promise and limits of institutionalist analysis’, Governance 9(4): 429–58.
29. Rehbinder, Eckhard and Stewart, Richard (1985) ‘Legal integration in federal systems: European Community environmental law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 33: 371–446.
30. Reich, Norbert and Woodroffe, Geoffrey (eds) (1993) ‘European consumer policy after Maastricht. Part I: Supranational issues’, special issue of Journal of Consumer Policy 16(3–4): 285–467.
31. Reich, Norbert and Woodroffe, Geoffrey (eds) (1994) ‘European consumer policy after Maastricht. Part II: National perspectives’, special issue of Journal of Consumer Policy 17(1): 3–145.
32. Sands, P. (1990) ‘European Community environmental law: legislation, the European Court of Justice and common-interest groups’, Modern Law Review 53: 685–98.
33. Scharpf, Fritz W. (1994) ‘Community and autonomy: multi-level policy-making in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 1(2): 219–42.
34. Stone Sweet Alec and Caporaso, James A. (1996) ‘From free trade to supranational polity: the European Court and integration’. Paper presented at the conference on Supranational Governance: the Institutionalization of the European Union, Center for German and European Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1 November.
35. Streeck, Wolfgang (1996) ‘Neo-voluntarism: a new social policy regime?’, in Marks et al. (eds), Governance in the European Union, London, Sage Publications, pp. 64–94.
36. Streeck, Wolfgang and Schmitter, Philippe C. (1991) ‘From national corporatism to transnational pluralism: organized interests in the single European market’, Politics & Society 19: 132–64.
37. Sun, Jeanne-Mey and Pelkmans, Jacques (1995) ‘Regulatory competition in the single market’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33: 67–89.
38. Tsebelis, George (1994) ‘The power of the European Parliament as a conditional agenda setter’, American Political Science Review 88(1) (March): 129–42.
39. Vogel, David (1992) ‘Environmental protection and the creation of a single European market’. Paper prepared for delivery at the 1992 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 3–6 September.
40. Vogel, David (1993) ‘Representing diffuse interests in environmental policymaking’, in R. Kent Weaver and Bert A. Rockman (eds), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 237–71.
41. Vogel, David (1995) Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Wallace, Helen, Wallace, William and Webb, Carole (eds) (1977, 1983) Policy-making in the European Community, London: John Wiley & Sons.
43. Young, Alasdair R. (1995) ‘Participation and policymaking in the European Community: mediating contending interests’. Paper presented at the Biannual Conference of the European Community Studies Association, Charleston, South Carolina, 11–14 May.