Inadequate reporting of controlled trials as short reports

Lancet

Volumn 352, Issue 9144, 1998, Pages 1908-

  Deeks, Jonathan J ^a   Altman, Douglas G ^a  

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 0032512279     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60399-6     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. 1 Schulz KF. Randomized trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines. Lancet 1996; 348: 596-98.
2. 2 Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT Statement. JAMA 1996; 276: 637-39.
3. 3 McNamee D, Horton R. Lies, damn lies, and reports of RCTs. Lancet 1996; 348: 562.
4. 4 Altman DG. Better reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT statement BMJ 1996; 313: 570-71.
5. 5 Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ. Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 69-76.