Reporting randomized medical-scientific research according to a standard method; the 'Consolidation of the standards of reporting trials' (CONSORT);Verslaglegging van gerandomiseerd medisch-wetenschappelijk onderzoek volgens een standaardmethode; de 'Consolidation of the standards of reporting trials' (CONSORT)

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 142, Issue 19, 1998, Pages 1089-1091

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; STANDARD;

CLINICAL TRIALS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; GUIDELINES; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; WRITING;

EID: 0032499514     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637-9
2. Rennie D. How to report randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:649.
3. Schulz KF. Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines. Lancet 1996;348:596-8.
4. McNamee D, Horton R, Lies, damn lies, and reports of RCTs. Lancet 1996;348:562.
5. Altman DG. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement BMJ 1996;313:570-1.
6. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273:408-12.
7. Gijn J van. The Netherlands. Randomised trials. Lancet 1996;347: 1234-5.