Mixed GL2/H2/GH2 control with pole placement and its application to vehicle suspension systems

International Journal of Control

Volumn 74, Issue 13, 2001, Pages 1353-1369

  Wang, Jun ^a   Wilson, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION CONTROL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; POLES AND ZEROS; RIDING QUALITIES; VEHICLE SUSPENSIONS;

SUSPENSION CONTROL SYSTEMS;

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035840749     PISSN: 00207179     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207170110070554     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ∞: An LMI approach. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 4041-4045.
2. ∞ performance bound: A Riccati equation approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 34, 293-305.
3. Boyd, S., Ghaoui, L.E., Feron, E., and Balakrishnan, V., 1994, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory (SIAM).
4. ∞ design with pole placement constraints: An LMI approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41, 358-367.
5. Crolla, D.A., Firth, G., and Horton, D., 1992, An introduction to vehicle dynamics. School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
6. ∞ optimization with spatial constraints. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4327-4332.
7. 2 synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 44, 1145-1156.
8. D'Andrea, R., and Istepanian, R.S.H., 2000, Design of full state feedback finite precision controllers. Submitted to International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control.
9. ∞ performance objectives II: Optimal control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.
10. ∞ synthesis. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 2396-2400.
11. ∞ synthesis. Automatica, 32, 1007-1014.
12. ∞ control. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 4, 421-448.
13. Gahinet, P., Nemirovski, A., Laub, A.J., and Chilali, M., 1995, LMI Control Toolbox for Use with MATLAB (The Math Works Inc.).
14. ∞-output feedback control of decoupled automobile active suspension systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 44, 392-396.
15. ∞ control problems: LMI existence conditions and state space formulas. Automatica, 30, 1307-1317.
16. Mari, J., 1996, A counterexample in power signal space. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41, 115-116.
17. Masubuchi, I., Ohara, A., and Suda, N., 1998, LMI-Based controller synthesis: A unified formulation and solution. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 8, 669-686.
18. 2 control problem. Automatica, 29, 373-385.
19. ∞ control. In Robust Control Theory, pp. 81-103 (Springer-Verlag).
20. Sánchez-Peña, R.S., and Sznaier, M., 1998, Robust Systems Theory and Applications (New York: Wiley).
21. Scherer, C., Gahinet, P., and Chilali, M., 1997, Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 42, 896-911.
22. ∞ control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40, 1054-1062.
23. Scherer, C.W., 1999, From mixed to multi-objective control. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3621-3610.
24. Skogestad, S., and Postlethwaite, I., 1996, Multivariable Feedback Control-Analysis and Design. (Chichester: Wiley).
25. ∞ control of active suspension systems. Technical report, University of Leeds.
26. 2 synthesis to decoupled active suspension systems. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 2664-2669.
27. ∞ robust-performance control of decoupled active suspension systems based on LMI method. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 2658-2663.
28. Wilson, D.A., 1989, Convolution and Hankel operator norms for linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 34, 94-97.
29. ∞ control. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3164-3168.
30. Wong, J.Y., 1993, Theory of Ground Vehicles, 2nd edn (Wiley).
31. ∞ control to active suspension systems. Automatics, 30, 1717-1729.
32. Zhou, K., Doyle, J.C., and Glover, K., 1996, Robust and Optimal Control (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
33. ∞ performance objectives I: Robust performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.