Odd-men-out are poorly localized in brief exposures

Journal of Vision

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 9-17

  Solomon, Joshua A ^a   Morgan, Michael J ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Proximity effect; Signal detection theory; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THEORY; TILTING; TIME; VISUAL STIMULATION; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PSYCHOPHYSICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 0035790207     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/1.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baldassi, S., & Burr, D. C. (2000). Feature-based integration of orientation signals in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1293-1300.
2. Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C., & Eckstein, M. (2000). Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement. Vision Research, 40(10 - 12), 1203-1215.
3. Eckstein, M. P. (1998). The lower visual search efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and note serial attentional processing. Psychological Science, 9(2), 111-118.
4. Kolb, F. C., & Braun, J. (1995). Blindsight in normal observers. Nature, 377, 336-338.
5. Krauskopf, J. & Farell, B. (1991). Vernier acuity: Effects of chromatic content, blur and contrast. Vision Research 31, 735-749.
6. Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., & Boes, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the theory of Statistics ( 3 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Morgan, M. J. & Aiba, T. S. (1985). Positional acuity with chromatic stimuli. Vision Research 25(5), 689-95.
8. Morgan, M. J., Mason, A. J. S., & Solomon, J. A. (1997). "Blindsight" in normal subjects? Nature, 385, 401-402.
9. Morgan, M. J., Ward, R. M., & Castet, E. (1998). Visual search for a tilted target: Tests of spatial uncertainty models. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A(2), 347-370.
10. Morgan, M. J., Watt, R. J. & McKee, S. P. (1983). Exposure duration affects the sensitivity of vernier acuity to target motion. Vision Research 23(5), 541-6.
11. Palmer, J. (1994). Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research, 34(13), 1703-1721.
12. Palmer, J., Ames, C. T., & Lindsey, D. T. (1993). Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 19(1), 108-130.
13. Palmer, J., Verghese, P., & Pavel, M. (2000). The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research, 40(10-12), 1227-1268.
14. Parkes, L., Lund, J., Angelucci, A., Solomon, J. A. & Morgan, M. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience. In press.
15. Sagi, D. (1990). Detection of an orientation singularity in Gabor textures: Effect of signal density and spatial-frequency. Vision Research 30(9), 1377-1388.
16. Sagi, D. & Julesz, B. (1987). Short range limitations on detection of feature differences. Spatial Vision, 2, 39-49.
17. Shaw, M. L. (1980). Identifying attentional and decision-making components in information processing. In R. W. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIII (pp. 276-296). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Verghese, P., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Stimulus discriminability in visual search. Vision Research, 34(18), 2453-2467.
19. Watt, R. J. & Morgan, M. J. ( 1983). The reognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision. Vision Research, 23, 1465-1477.