Evaluation of the Effect of the Residual Bone Angulation on Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses in Mandibular Posterior Edentulism. Part I: Spiral Computed Tomography Study

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 216-222

  Akça, Kivanç ^a,b   Iplikçioǧlu, Haldun ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Buccolingual angulation; Computed tomography; Mandibular posterior edentulism

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BICUSPID; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0035226275     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200107000-00017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. st ed. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985:11-77.
2. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:291-298.
3. Sullivan DY. Prosthetic considerations for the utilization of osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous arch. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1:39-45.
4. Steenberghe DV, Lekholm U, Bolender C, et al. The application of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:272-281.
5. Jemt T, Leckholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:211-217.
6. Pylant T, Triplett RG, Key MC, et al. A retrospective evaluation of endosseous titanium implants in the partially edentulous patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:195-202.
7. Wyatt CCL, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:204-211.
8. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:635-640.
9. Abrahams JJ. Anatomy of the jaw revisited with a dental CT software program. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14: 979-990.
10. Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996: 356-358.
11. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:843-848.
12. Soltesz U, Siegele D. Principal characteristics of the stress distribution in the jaw caused by dental implants. In: Huiskes R, Van Campen D, De Wijn J (eds). Biomechanics: Principles and Applications. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982:439-444.
13. Rangert B, Krogh PHJ, Langer B, et al. Bending overload and implant fracture: A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:326-334.
14. Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, et al. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: A three dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:82-90.
15. Siegele D, Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:333-340.
16. Ismail YH, Azarbal M, Kapa SF. Conventional linear tomography: Protocol for assessing endosseous implant sites. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:153-157.
17. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, et al. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol. 1993;64:1243-1249.
18. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Chafetz N, et al. Computed tomography in dental implant surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1989;33:555-597.
19. Almog DM, Onufrak JM, Hebel K, et al. Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography: A pilot study. J Oral Implantol. 1995; 21:275-280.
20. Weinberg LA. CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:381-385.
21. Lee SY, Morgano SM. A diagnostic stent for endosseous implants to improve conventional tomographic radiographs. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:482-485.
22. Kregzde M. A method of selecting the best implant prosthesis design option using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:662-673.
23. Fredrickson EJ, Stevens PJ, Gress ML. Implant Prosthodontics: Clinical and Laboratory Procedures. St. Louis: Mosby, 1994:4-7.
24. Petrikowski CG, Pharoah MJ, Schmitt A. Presurgical radiographic assessment for implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:59-64.
25. Lomasney LM, Steinberg MJ. Computerized imaging before patients undergo dental implantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1439-1446.
26. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993:129-130.
27. Ekustubbe A, Gröndahl G, Gröndahl HG. The use of tomograph for dental implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1997;26:206-213.
28. Slasky B, Ziv JB. Lingual mandibular bony defects: CT in the bucco-lingual plane. J Comput Assit Tomog. 1996;20: 439-443.
29. Weinberg LA, Kruger B. Three dimensional guidance system for implant insertion: Part I. Implant Dent. 1998;7:81-93.
30. Feingold GM, Grant AA, Johnson W. The effect of variation of residual ridge angle on partial denture abutment tooth movement. J Oral Rehabil. 1988;15:379-384.
31. Stella JP, Tharanon W. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: Implications for dental implants: Part II. Clinical application. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5:23-29.
32. Verde ML, Morgano SM. A dual purpose stent for the implant supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69: 276-80.