Osseointegration of Rough Acid-Etched Titanium Implants: 5-Year Follow-up of 100 Minimatic Implants

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 384-391

  De Leonardis, Dario ^a   Garg, Arun K ^a,d   Pecora, Gabriele E ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acid etched implants; Five year follow up; Osseointegration; Rough surface implants

Indexed keywords

HYDROFLUORIC ACID; NITRIC ACID; TITANIUM; TITANIUM ALLOY (TIAL6V4);

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDENTULOUSNESS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PERIODONTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PLAQUE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PLAQUE INDEX; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; NITRIC ACID; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PERIODONTAL INDEX; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033129618     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brånemark P-I, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Olsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3:81-100.
2. Albrektsson T, Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170.
3. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
4. Kassemo B, Lausmaa J. Aspects of surface physics on titanium implants. Swed Dent J 1985;28:19-36.
5. Masuda T, Yliheikkilä PK, Felton DA, Cooper LF. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:17-29.
6. Glantz P-O. Biomaterial considerations for the optimized therapy for the edentulous predicament. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:90-92.
7. Steinemann S. The properties of titanium. In: Schroeder A, Sutter F, Krekeler G (eds). Oral Implantology. Basics ITI Hollow Cylinder, vol 3. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1991:37-58.
8. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johnsson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:486-494.
9. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox C, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone reaction to titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
10. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC (eds). Clinical Implant Materials: Advances in Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990;9:309-314.
11. Thomas K, Cook S. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation and direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res 1985;19:875-901.
12. 2-blasted titanium implants: An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:77-84.
13. Han C-H, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:1-10.
14. Sullivan DY, Sherwood RI, Mai TN. Preliminary results of a multicenter study evaluating a chemically enhanced surface for machined commercially pure titanium implants. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:379-386.
15. Wennerberg A. On surface roughness and implant incorpo-ration [thesis]. Göteborg: Univ of Göteborg, 1988.
16. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111.
17. Schwartz Z, Martin JY, Dean DD, Simpson J, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production, and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:145-155.
18. Hambleton J, Schwartz Z, Khare A, Windeler SW, Luna M, Brooks BP, et al. Culture surfaces coated with various implant materials affect chondrocyte growth and differentiation. J Orthop Res 1994;12:542-552.
19. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.
20. De Leonardis D, Garg AK, Pecora GE, Andreana S. Osseointegration of rough acid-etched implants: One-year follow-up of placement of 100 Minimatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:65-73.
21. Lekholm U. Clinical procedures for treatment with osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50: 116-120.
22. Mombelli A, van Oosten MAC, Schurch E, Long NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987; 2:145-151.
23. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1: 33-40.
24. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockier B, Brånemark P-I, Lindhe J, Eriksson B, Sbordone L. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I): A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;15: 39-52.
25. Cox JF, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated implants: A 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:91-109.
26. Hesingen AL, Lyberg T. Comparative surface analysis and clinical performance studies of Brånemark implants and related clones. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9: 422-430.
27. Wong M, Eulenberger R, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topography on the osseointegration of implant materials on trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29:1567-1575.
28. Thomas KA, Kay JF, Cook SK, Jarcho M. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;27: 1395-1414.
29. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:302-310.
30. Schwartz Z, Kieswetter K, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Underlying mechanisms at the bone-surface interface during regeneration. J Periodont Res 1997;32:166-171.
31. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, Boyan B. The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:329-345.