Accuracy of Digora System in Detecting Artificial Peri-implant Bone Defects

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 265-271

  Matsuda, Yukiko ^a   Hanazawa, Tomomi ^b   Seki, Kenji ^b   Sano, Tsukasa ^b   Ozeki, Masahiko ^b   Okano, Tomohiro ^b  

^a SHOWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Artificial bone defect; Digital radiography; Dose reduction; Peri implantitis

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOLYSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER CURVE; CADAVER; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0035748666     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200110000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:347-359.
2. Esposito M, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K. Radiological evaluation of marginal bone loss at tooth surfaces facing single Brånemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993;4:151-157.
3. Pylant T, Triplett RG, Key MC, et al. A retrospective evaluation of endosseous titanium implants in the partially edentulous patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:195-202.
4. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: A study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:142-146.
5. De Bruyn H, Collaert B, Lindén U, et al. A comparative study of the clinical efficacy of Screw Vent implants versus Brånemark fixtures, installed in a periodontal clinic. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:32-41.
6. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol. 1991;62:2-4.
7. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:387-416.
8. Vandre RH, Webber RL. Future trends in dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80:471-478.
9. Sanderink GC. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids. Int Dent J. 1993;43:335-342.
10. Wenzel A, Gröndahl HG. Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J. 1995;45:27-34.
11. Borg E, Gröndahl HG. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996; 25:82-88.
12. Sonoda M, Takano M, Muyajima J, et al. Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;60: 448-453.
13. Kashima I, Kanno M, Higashi T, et al. Computed panoramic tomography with scanning laser-simulated luminescence. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;60:448-453.
14. Seki K, Okano T. Exposure reduction in cephalography with a digital photostimulable phosphor imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993;22:127-130.
15. Wenzel A, Borg E, Hintze H, et al. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: An in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1995;24: 250-254.
16. st ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1989:211-233.
17. st ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1989:117-126.
18. Metz CE, Wang PL, Kronman HB. A new approach for testing significance of differences between ROC curves measuring from correlated data. In: Deconinck F, ed. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. 1984:432-445.
19. Gröndahl K, Lekholm U. The predictive value of radiographic diagnosis of implant instability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:59-64.
20. Stentz WC, Mealey BL, Nummikoski PV, et al. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis. J Periodontol. 1997;68:199-208.
21. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part I: Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:451-457.
22. Sundén S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Branemark dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6:220-226.
23. Worthington P, Bolender CL, Taylor TD. The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: Problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;2:77-84.
24. Jovanovic SA, Spiekermann H, Richter EJ. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:233-245.
25. Hollander L. Radiographic examination of endosseous implants in the jaws. In: Worthington P, Branemark P-I, eds. Advanced Osseointegration Surgery: Applications in the Maxillofacial Region. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1992: 80-93.
26. Webber RL, Horton RA, Underhill TE, et al. Comparison of film, direct digital, and tunes-apature computed tomography images to identify the location of crestal defects around endosseous titanium implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;81:480-490.
27. Svanaes DB, Moystad A, Risnes S, et al. Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82:94-100.
28. Kullendorff B, Nilsson M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82:585-589.
29. van der Stelt PF. Experimentally produced bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1985;59:306-312.
30. Velders XL, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;81:607-612.
31. Huysmans MC, Hintz H, Wenzel A. Effect of exposure time on in vitro caries diagnosis using the Digora system. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:15-20.
32. Matsuda Y, Okano T, Igeta A, et al. Effects of exposure reduction on the accuracy of an intraoral photostimulable-phosphor imaging system in detecting incipient proximal caries. Oral Radiol. 1995;11:11-16.