Defining the need for information technology instruction among science faculty

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 5-42

  Quigley, Brian D ^a   Church, Gary Mason ^b   Peterson, Anne ^b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic article databases; Engineering faculty; Information technology; Internet; Library instruction; Science faculty; Stress; University libraries; User needs; User surveys; World Wide Web

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035737493     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J122v20n01_02     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Abels, Eileen G., Peter Liebscher, and Daniel W. Denman. 1996. Factors that influence the use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty at small institutions. Part I: Queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47(2): 146-158.
2. Adams, Judith A., and Sharon C. Bonk. 1995. Electronic information technologies and resources: Use by university faculty and faculty preferences for related library services. College & Research Libraries 56(2): 119-131.
3. Bradford, Jane T., Kelly E. Kannon, and Susan M. Ryan. 1996. Designing and implementing a faculty Internet workshop: A collaborative effort of Academic Computing Services and the university library. Research Strategies 14(4): 234-245.
4. Fox, Richard J., Melvin R. Crask, and Jonghoon Kim. 1988. Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opinion Quarterly 52(4): 467-491.
5. Gilbert, Steve. 1995. An "online" experience: Discussion group debates why faculty use or resist technology. Change 27(2): 28-45.
6. Hall, Leilani. 1999. A home-grown program for raising faculty information competence. Computers in Libraries 19(8): 28-34.
7. Hurd, Julie M., and Ann C. Weller. 1997. From print to electronic: The adoption of information technology by academic chemists. Science & Technology Libraries 6(3-4): 147-170.
8. Leckie, Gloria J., and Anne Fullerton. 1999. Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: Faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. College & Research Libraries 60(1): 9-29.
9. Liebscher, Peter, Eileen G. Abels, and Daniel W. Denman. 1997. Factors that influence the use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty at small institutions. Part II: Preliminary use indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48(6): 496-507.
10. Sax, Linda J., Alexander W. Astin, William S. Korn, and Shannon K. Gilmartin. 1999. The American college teacher: National norms for the 1998-1999 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, Inc.
11. Stahl, Aletha D. 1997. "What I want in a librarian": One new faculty member's perspective. Reference & User Services Quarterly 37(2): 133-135.
12. Starkweather, Wendy M., and Camille C. Wallin. 1999. Faculty response to library technology: Insights on attitudes. Library Trends 47(4): 640-668.
13. Steffen, Susan S. 1986. College faculty goes online: Training faculty end users. Journal of Academic Librarianship 12(3): 147-151.
14. Wimmer, Roger D., and Joseph R. Dominick. 1994. Mass media research: An introduction. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.