Metaphysics, method, and the mouth: Philosophical lessons of speech perception

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 261-291

  Trout, J D ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035649335     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09515080120072604     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. BAAYEN, R.H., PIEPENBROCK, R. & VAN RIJN, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
2. BACH, K. (1982). De re belief and methodological solipsism. In A. WOODFIELD (Ed.) Thought and object. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. BECHTEL, W. & RICHARDSON, R. (1993). Discovering complexity: decomposition and localization at strategies in scientific research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. BERKELEY, G. (1965). Berkeley's philosophical writings. New York: Macmillan.
5. BERTELSON, P. & RADEAU, M. (1981). Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 578-584.
6. BINNIE, C., MONTGOMERY, A. & JACKSON, P. (1974). Auditory and visual contributions to the perception of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 619-630.
7. BURGE, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, IV, 73-121.
8. BURGE, T. (1986a). Individualism and psychology. The Philosophical Review, XCV, 3-45.
9. BURGE, T. (1986b). Cartesian error and the objectivity of perception. In P. PETTIT & J. MCDOWELL (Eds) Subject, thought, and context. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. BURGE, T. (1989). Individualism and causation in psychology. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 70, 303-322.
11. CHOE, C., WELCH, R., GILFORD, R. & JUOLA, J. (1975). The "ventriloquist effect": visual dominance or response bias? Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 55-60.
12. DANCY, J. (1985). Contemporary epistemology. London: Blackwell.
13. DAVIES, M. (1991). Individualism and perceptual content. Mind, 100, 461-484.
14. DENNETT, D. (1981). Three kinds of intentional psychology. In R. HEALY (Ed.) Reduction, time and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. DODD, B. (1977). The role of vision in the perception of speech. Perception, 6, 31-40.
16. EGAN, F. (1991). Must psychology be individualistic? The Philosophical Review, 100, 179-203.
17. EGAN, F. (1992). Individualism, computation, and perceptual content. Mind, 101, 443-459.
18. ERBER, N. (1972). Auditory, visual and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 413-422.
19. ERBER, N. (1979). Auditory-visual perception of speech with reduced optical clarity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 212-223.
20. FISHER, C. (1968). Confusions among visually perceived consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 796-804.
21. FITCH, H.L., HALWES, T., ERICKSON, D.M. & LIBERMAN, A.M. (1980). Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop-consonant manner. Perception and Psychophysics, 27, 343-350.
22. FODOR, J.A. (1980). Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 63-73.
23. FODOR, J.A. (1982). Cognitive science and the twin-earth problem. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23, 98-118.
24. FODOR, J.A. (1985). Precis of Modularity of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 1-42.
25. FODOR, J.A. (1987). Psychosemantics. Cambridge: MIT Press, Bradford.
26. FODOR, J.A. (1980, 1991). Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. In D. ROSENTHAL (Ed.) The nature of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. FODOR, J.A. (1994). The elm and the expert. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. FOWLER, C.A. (1991). Auditory perception is not special: we see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2910-2915.
29. FOWLER, C. & DEKLE, D. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 816-828.
30. FRIEDERICI, A.D. & WESSELS, J.M. (1993). Phonotactic knowledge and its use in infant speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 287-295.
31. GODFREY-SMITH, P. (1996). Complexity and the function of mind in nature. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. HALDANE, E. & ROSS, G. (Eds) (1955). The philosophical works of Descartes. New York: Dover.
33. JACK, C. & THURLOW, W. (1973). Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the "ventriloquism" effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 967-979.
34. JUSCZYK, P.W. (1995). Language acquisition: speech sounds and the beginning of phonology. In J.L. MILLER & P.D. EIMAS (Eds) Speech, language, and communication. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. JUSCZYK, P.W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. KLEMM, O. (1909). Lokalisation von Sinneseindrucken bei disparaten Nebenreizen. Psychologische Studien (Wundt), 5, 73-161.
37. LADEFOGED, P. (1982). A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.
38. LINGUISTICS DATA CONSORTIUM. (1993). CD-ROM LDC-93-T1. University of Pennsylvania.
39. LOAR, B. (1988). Social content and psychological content. In R. GRIMM & D. MERRILL (Eds) Contents of thought. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
40. MACDONALD, J. & MCGURK, H. (1978). Visual influences on speech perception processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 24, 253-257.
41. MASSARO, D. (1987). Speech perception by the ear and eye. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. MASSARO, D. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: from speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. MASSARO, D. & COHEN, M. (1983). Evaluation and integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 753-771.
44. MCGURK, H. & MACDONALD, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
45. MILLER, G. & NICELY, P. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
46. NYGAARD, L. & PISONI, D. (1995). Speech perception: new directions in research and theory. In J.L. MILLER & P.D. EIMAS (Eds) Speech, language, and communication. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47. PATTERSON, S. (1991). Individualism and semantic development. Philosophy of Science, 58, 15-35.
48. PICK, H., WARREN, D. & HAY, J. (1969). Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 203-205.
49. PUTNAM, H. (1975). The meaning of "meaning". In H. PUTNAM, Mind, language and reality: philosophical papers, vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. RADEAU, M. & BERTELSON, P. (1976). The effect of a textured visual field on modality dominance in a ventriloquism situation. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 227-235.
51. REISBERG, D., MCLEAN, J. & GOLDFIELD, A. (1987). Easy to hear but hard to understand: a lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. In B. DODD & R. CAMPBELL (Eds) Hearing by eye: the psychology of lip-reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. REMEZ, R. (1994). A guide to research on the perception of speech. In M. GERNSBACHER (Ed.) Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
53. REPP, B. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 81-110.
54. SAFFRAN, J., ASON, R. & NEWPORT, E. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
55. SALDANA, H.M., PISONI, D.B., FELLOWS, J.M. & REMEZ, R.E. (1995). Audio-visual speech perception without speech cues. Research on spoken language processing. Progress Report No. 20, Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
56. SEGAL, G. (1989). Seeing what is not there. Philosophical Review, 98, 189-214.
57. SEGAL, G. (1991). Defence of a reasonable individualism. Mind, 100, 485-494.
58. SEGAL, G. (2000). A slim book about narrow content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. SHOEMAKER, S. (1984). Causality and properties. In Identity, cause, and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press
60. STALNAKER, R. (1989). On what's in the head. In J. TOMBERLIN (Ed.) Philosophical perspectives, vol.3: the philosophy of mind and action. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
61. STICH, S. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford.
62. SUMMERFIELD, Q. (1979). Use of visual information in phonetic perception. Phonetica, 36, 314-331.
63. TELLER, P. (1992). A contemporary look at emergence. In A. BECKERMANN, H. FLOHR & J. KIM (Eds) Emergence or reduction?: essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism. New York: Walter de
64. TROUT, J.D. (1988). Belief, attribution and method: a scientific defense of folk psychology. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
65. TROUT, J.D. (1998). Measuring the intentional world: realism, naturalism, and quantitative methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
66. TROUT, J.D. (2001). The biological basis of speech: what to infer from talking to the animals. Psychological Review, 108(3), 523-549.
67. TROUT, J.D. & POSER, W.J. (1990). Auditory and visual influences on phonemic restoration. Language and Speech, 33, 121-135.
68. WILSON, R. (1995). Cartesian psychology and physical minds: individualism and the sciences of the mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. WIMSATT, W. (1994). The ontology of complex systems: levels of organization, perspectives, and causal thickets. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20, 207-274.
70. YOST, W. (1992). Auditory perception and sound source determination. Psychological Science, 1, 179-184.