The biological basis of speech: What to infer from talking to the animals

Psychological Review

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 523-549

  Trout, J D ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REVIEW; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 85047685103     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.523     Document Type: Article

References (156)

1. Allen, C., & Saidel, E. (1998). The evolution of reference. In D. Cummins & C. Allen (Eds.), The evolution of mind (pp. 183-203). New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Best, C., Morrongiello, B., & Robson, R. (1981). Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 191-211.
3. Blumstein, S. (1995). The neurobiology of language. In J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication (pp. 339-370). New York: Academic Press.
4. Boyd, R. (1985). Lex orandi est lex credendi. In P. M. Churchland & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism (pp. 3-34). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Boysen, S. (1989). Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 23-31.
6. Boysen, S. (1997). Representation of quantities in apes. In P. J. B. Slater, J. S. Rosenblatt, C. T. Snowdon, & M. Milinski (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (pp. 435-462). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Bradlow, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 977-985.
8. Bradlow, A., Pisoni, D., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning in speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299-2310.
9. Bregman, A. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961). The misbehavior of organisms. American Psychologist, 16, 681-684.
11. Calvert, G., Bullmore, E., Brammer, M., Campbell, R., Williams, S., McGuire, P., Woodruff, P., Iversen, S., & David, A. (1997, April 25). Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science, 276, 593-596.
12. Carnap, R. (1950). Logical foundations of probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Carney, A., Widin, G., & Veimeister, N. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 961-970.
14. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
15. Coss, R., & Moore, M. (1990). All that glistens: Water connotations in surface finishes. Ecological Psychology, 2, 367-380.
16. Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218-236.
17. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
18. Darwin, C. (1962). The origin of species (6th ed.). New York: Collier. (Original work published 1859)
19. Davies, P. C. W. (1977). Space and time in the modern universe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Dawkins, R. (1987). The blind watchmaker. New York: Norton.
21. Diehl, R., & Kluender, K. (1989). On the objects of speech perception. Ecological Psychology, 1, 121-144.
22. Dooling, R. J. (1980). Behavior and psychophysics of hearing in birds. In A. N. Popper & R. R. Fay (Eds.), Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates (pp. 261-288). New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Dooling, R. J., Best, C. T., & Brown, S. D. (1995). Discrimination of synthetic full-formant and sinewave /ra-la/ continua by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1839-1846.
24. Dooling, R. J., & Hulse, R. J. (Eds.). (1989). The comparative psychology of audition: Perceiving complex sounds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Dronkers, N., Redfern, B., & Knight, R. (2000). The neural architecture of language disorders. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 949-958). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Eimas, P. (1982). Speech perception: A view of the initial state and perceptual mechanisms. In J. Mehler, E. C. T. Walker, & M. Garrett, (Eds.), Perspectives on mental representation (pp. 340-360). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Erber, N. (1972). Auditory, visual and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 413-422.
28. Erber, N. (1979). Auditory-visual perception of speech with reduced optical clarity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 212-223.
29. Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
30. Fitch, H. L., Halwes, T., Erickson, D. M., & Liberman, A. M. (1980). Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop-consonant manner. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 343-350.
31. Flege, J., MacKay, I., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2973-2987.
32. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Fodor, J. A. (1986). Why paramecia don't have mental representations. In P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy (Vol. 10, pp. 3-23). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34. Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1981). How direct is visual perception? Some reflections on Gibson's "ecological approach." Cognition, 9, 139-196.
35. Fowler, C. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3-28.
36. Fowler, C. (1989). Real objects of speech perception: A commentary on Diehl and Kluender. Ecological Psychology, 1(2), 145-160.
37. Fowler, C. (1991). Auditory perception is not special: We see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(6), 2910-2915.
38. Fowler, C., & Dekle, D. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: Cross-modal contributions to speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 816-828.
39. Fowler, C., & Rosenblum, L. (1990). Duplex perception: A comparison of monosyllables and slamming of doors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Reception and Performance, 16, 742-754.
40. Fowler, C., & Rosenblum, L. (1991). The perception of phonetic gestures. In I. G. Mattingly & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception (pp. 33-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Friederici, A. D., & Wessels, J. M. (1993). Phonotactic knowledge and its use in infant speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 287-295.
42. Fujisaki, H., & Kawashima, T. (1970). Some experiments on speech perception and a model for the perceptual mechanism. Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute (Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo), 29, 207-214.
43. Gaver, W. (1993a). How do we hear in the world?: Explorations in ecological acoustics. Ecological Psychology, 54, 285-313.
44. Gaver, W. (1993b). What in the world do we hear?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 51, 1-29.
45. Geffen, G., & Quinn, K. (1984). Hemispheric specialization and ear advantages in processing speech. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 273-291.
46. Gleason, H. (1961). An introduction to descriptive linguistics (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
47. Grunke, M. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1982). Some experiments on perceptual learning of mirror-image acoustic patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 210-218.
48. Hauser, M. (1996). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
49. Hauser, M. (2000). Wild minds. New York: Holt.
50. Hauser, M., & Fowler, C. (1992). Fundamental frequency declination is not unique to human speech: Evidence from nonhuman primates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 363-369.
51. Hauser, M., & Konishi, M. (Eds.). (1999). The design of animal communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Perception of sine-wave analogs of voice-onset time stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 231-240.
53. Jusczyk, P. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Jusczyk, P., & Bertoncini, J. (1988). Viewing the development of speech perception as an innately guided learning process. Language and Speech, 3, 217-236.
55. Jusczyk, P., Friederici, A., Wessels, J., Svenkerud, V., & Jusczyk, A. M. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402-420.
56. Jusczyk, P., Hohne, E., & Bauman, A. (1999). Infants' sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1465-1476.
57. Kimura, D. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15, 166-171.
58. Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163-178.
59. Kluender, K. (1991). Effects of first formant onset properties on voicing judgments result from processes not specific to humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 83-96.
60. Kluender, K. (1994). Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 173-217). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61. Kluender, K., & Diehl, R. (1987). Use of multiple speech dimensions in concept formation by Japanese quail. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Suppl. 1, 82, S84.
62. Kluender, K. R., Diehl, R. L., & Killeen, P. R. (1987, September 4). Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science, 237, 1195-1197.
63. Kruschke, J., & Johansen, M. (1999). A model of probabilistic category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1083-1119.
64. Kuhl, P. (1986). Theoretical contributions of tests on animals to the special mechanisms debate in speech. Experimental Biology, 45, 233-265.
65. Kuhl, P. (1987). The special-mechanisms debate in speech research: Categorization tests on animals and infants. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception (pp. 355-386). New York: Cambridge University Press.
66. Kuhl, P. (2000). Language, mind, and brain: Experience alters perception. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 99-115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Kuhl, P., & Miller, J. D. (1975, October 3). Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science, 190, 69-72.
68. Kuhl, P., & Miller, J. D. (1978). Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 905-917.
69. Kuhl, P., & Padden, D. (1982). Enhanced discrimination at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 542-550.
70. Kuhl, P., & Padden, D. (1983). Enhanced discrimination at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1003-1010.
71. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. Lenneberg, E. (Ed.). (1964). New directions in the study of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. Lenneberg, E. (1967). The biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
74. Lewontin, R. (1998). The evolution of cognition: Questions we will never answer. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.), Methods, models, and conceptual issues: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 4, pp. 107-132). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Liberman, A. M. (1979). Duplex perception and integration of cues: Evidence that speech is different from nonspeech and similar to language. In E. Fisher-Jorgensen, J. Rishel, & N. Thorsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the IXth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 468-473). Copenhagen, Denmark: University of Copenhagen Press.
76. Liberman, A. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Liberman, A., Cooper, F., Shankweiler, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
78. Liberman, A., Harris, K., Hoffman, H., & Griffith, B. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358-368.
79. Liberman, A., & Mattingly, I. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
80. Liberman, A., & Mattingly, I. (1989, January 27). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243, 489-494.
81. Liberman, A. M., & Whalen, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187-196.
82. Lieberman, P. (1991). Uniquely human: The evolution of speech, thought, and selfless behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83. Lieberman, P. (1998). Eve spoke: Human language and human evolution. New York: W. W. Norton.
84. Locke, J. (1993). The child's path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85. Locke, J. (1995). Linguistic capacity: An ontogenetic theory with evolutionary implications. In E. Zimmerman, J. D., Newman, & U. Jurgens (Eds.), Current topics and primate vocal communication (pp. 273-282). New York: Plenum.
86. Locke, J. (1997). A theory of neurolinguistic development. Brain and Language, 58, 265-326.
87. Lotto, A., Kluender, K., & Holt, L. (1997). Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1134-1140.
88. Marler, P. (1970). A comparative approach to vocal learning: Song development in white crowned sparrow. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology Monographs, 71, 1-25.
89. Massaro, D. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. Massaro, D. (1998). Perceiving talking faces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. Massaro, D., & Cohen, M. (1983). Categorical or continuous speech perception: A new test. Speech Communication, 2, 15-35.
92. Mattingly, I. (1991, August). In defense of the motor theory. Current phonetic research paradigms: Implications for speech motor control. Paper presented at a symposium organized by the Phonetics Laboratory of the University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
93. Mattingly, I., Liberman, A., Syrdal, A., & Halwes, T. (1971). Discrimination in speech and nonspeech modes. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 131-157.
94. McCandliss, B. D., Fiez, J. A., Conway, M., Protopapas, A., & McClelland, J. L. (1998). Eliciting adult plasticity: Both adaptive and non-adaptive training improves Japanese adults' identification of English /r/ and /l/. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 24, 1898.
95. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
96. Miller, J. L., Connine, C., Schermer, T., & Kluender, K. (1983). A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 2124-2133.
97. Miller, J. L., & Jusczyk, P. (1989). Seeking the neurobiological bases of speech perception. Cognition, 33, 111-137.
98. Morgan, L. (1906). An introduction to comparative psychology (2nd ed.). London: Walter Scott.
99. Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Ilmoniemi, A.-J., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Sinkkonen, J., & Alho, K. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432-434.
100. Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11-28.
101. Newport, E. L., & Supalla, T. (1980). Clues from the acquisition of signed and spoken language. Signed and spoken language: Biological constraints on linguistic form (pp. 187-211). Weinheim, Germany: Verlag Chemie.
102. Nicholls, M. (1998). Support for a structural model of aural asymmetries. Cortex, 34, 99-110.
103. Nosofsky, R. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87-108.
104. Nygaard, L. (1993). Phonetic coherence in duplex perception: Effects of acoustic differences and lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 268-286.
105. Nygaard, L., & Eimas, P. (1990). A new version of duplex perception: Evidence for phonetic and nonphonetic fusion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 75-86.
106. Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5(1), 42-46.
107. Parker, E. (1988). Auditory constraints on the perception of stop voicing: The influence of lower-tone frequency on judgments of tone-onset simultaneity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(4), 1597-1607.
108. Perrin, J. (1913). Les atomes. Paris: Alcan.
109. Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1988, February 18). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature, 331, 585-589.
110. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Harper Collins.
111. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
112. Pisoni, D. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 253-260.
113. Pisoni, D. (1987). General discussion of session 3: Dynamic aspects. In M. E. H. Schouten (Ed.), Psychophysics of speech perception (Series D, No. 39, pp. 264-267). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Nijhoff.
114. Pisoni, D., Svirsky, M., Kirk, K., & Miyamoto, R. (1997, May). Looking at the "Stars": A first report on the intercorrelations among measures of speech perception, intelligibility, and language in pediatric cochlear implant users. Presented at the 5th International Cochlear Implant Conference, New York.
115. Pisoni, D., & Tash, J. (1974). Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 152, 285-290.
116. Poeppel, D., Phillips, C., Yellin, E., Rowley, H., Roberts, T., & Marantz, A. (1997). Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 221, 145-148.
117. Posner, M. I., & Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Library.
118. Pylyshyn, Z. (1989). Computing in cognitive science. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 51-91). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
119. Raichle, M. (1998). Behind the scenes of function brain imaging: A historical and physiological perspective. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, 95, 765-772.
120. Ramus, F., Hauser, M., Miller, C., Morris, D., & Mehler, J. (2000, April 14). Language discrimination by human newborns and Cotton-Top Tamarin monkeys. Science, 288, 349-351.
121. Rauschecker, J., Tian, B., & Hauser, M. (1995, April 7). Processing of complex sounds in the macaque nonprimary auditory cortex. Science, 268, 111-114.
122. Reisberg, D., McLean, J., & Goldfield, A. (1987). Easy to hear but hard to understand: A lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 97-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
123. Remez, R. (1989). When the objects of perception are spoken. Ecological Psychology, 1(2), 161-180.
124. Remez, R., Fellowes, J., Pisoni, D., Goh, W., & Rubin, P. (1997). Audio-visual speech perception without traditional speech cues: A second report. In C. Benoit & R. Campbell (Eds.), Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Audio-Visual Speech Processing: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Rhodes, Greece: ESCA.
125. Remez, R., Rubin, P., Berns, S., & Pardo, J. (1994). On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review, 101, 129-156.
126. Remez, R., Rubin, P., Pisoni, D., & Carrell, T. (1981, May 22). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947-950.
127. Repp, B. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 81-110.
128. Saffran, E., Dell, G., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Computational modeling of language disorders. In M. Gazzaniga, (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 933-948). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
129. Saffran, J., Aslin, R., & Newport, E. (1996, December 13). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
130. Sams, M., Aulanko, R., Hamalainen, M., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O., Lu, S.-T., & Simola, J. (1991). Seeing speech: Visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 127, 141-145.
131. Samuel, A. (1977). The effect of discrimination training on speech perception: Noncategorical perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 321-330.
132. Sawusch, J. (1976). Selective adaptation effects on end-point stimuli in a speech series. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 61-65.
133. Shankweiler, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Identification of consonants and vowels presented to the left and right ears. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 59-63.
134. Sinnott, J. (1998). Comparative phoneme boundaries. Current Topics in Acoustical Research, 2, 135-138.
135. Sinnott, J., Brown, C., Malik, W., & Kressley, R. (1997). A multidimensional scaling analysis of vowel discrimination in humans and monkeys. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1214-1224.
136. Sinnott, J., & Williamson, T. (1999). Can macaques perceive place of articulation from formant transition information? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(2), 929-937.
137. Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. The American Psychologist, 11, 221-233.
138. Sober, E. (1998). Morgan's canon. In D. Cummins & C. Allen (Eds.), The evolution of mind (pp. 224-242). New York: Oxford University Press.
139. Stevens, K. (1980). Acoustic correlates of some phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 836-842.
140. Stevens, K. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
141. Stevens, K., & Blumstein, S. (1978). Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1358-1368.
142. Stevens, K., & Blumstein, S. (1981). The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features. In P. Eimas & J. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on the study of speech (pp. 1-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
143. Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1974). The perception of speech. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics (Vol. 12, pp. 2349-2385). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
144. Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1976). Speech perception. In J. L. Lass (Ed.), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics (pp. 243-293). New York: Academic Press.
145. Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1980). Speech perception. Language and Speech, 23, 45-66.
146. Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1991). Language development from an evolutionary perspective. In N. Krasnegor, D. Rumbaugh, R., Schiefelbusch, & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 5-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
147. Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Shankweiler, D. (1970). Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 48(2), 579-594.
148. Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
149. Svirsky, M., Robbins, A., Kirk, K., Pisoni, D., & Miyamoto, R. (2000). Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychological Science, 11(2), 153-158.
150. Trout, J. D. (1998). Measuring the intentional world: Realism, naturalism, and quantitative methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
151. Trout, J. D., & Poser, W. (1990). Auditory and visual influences on phonemic restoration. Language and Speech, 33(2), 121-135.
152. Whalen, D., & Liberman, A. (1987, July 10). Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception. Science, 237, 169-171.
153. Williams, N. (1997, January 3). Evolutionary psychologists look for roots of cognition. Science, 275, 29-30.
154. Wyttenbach, R., May, M., & Hoy, R. (1996, September 13). Categorical perception of sound frequency by crickets. Science, 273, 1542-1544.
155. Zatorre, R., Evans, A., Meyer, E., & Gjedde, A. (1992. May 8). Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science, 256, 846-849.
156. Zurif, E. (1990). Language and the brain. In D. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Language (pp. 177-198). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.