Self-monitoring and performance appraisal satisfaction: An exploratory field study

Human Resource Management

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 321-332

  Miller, Janice S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035643998     PISSN: 00904848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.1022     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Atwater, L.E. (1998). The advantages and pitfalls of self-assessment in organizations. In J.W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State-of-the-Art in practice (pp. 278-330). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Baron, R.A. (1989). Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of the Type A behavior pattern and self-monitoring. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 281-296.
3. Becker, T.E., Billings, R.S., Eveleth, D.M., & Gilbert, N.L. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 464-482.
4. Bernardin, H.J., & Beatty R.W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human performance at work. Boston: Kent.
5. Caldwell, D.F., & O'Reilly, C.A. (1982). Boundary spanning and individual performance: The impact of self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 124-127.
6. Caligiuri, P.M., & Day, D.V. (2000). Effects of self-monitoring on technical, contextual, and assignment-specific performance. Group and Organization Management, 25(2), 154-174.
7. Campbell, D.J., & Lee, C. (1988). Self-appraisal in performance evaluation: Development versus evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 302-314.
8. Cardy, R.L., & Dobbins, G.H. (1994). Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing.
9. Carroll, S.J., & Schneier, C.E. (1982). Performance appraisals and review systems: The identification, measurement, and development of performance in organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
10. Cawley, B.D., Keeping L.M., & Levy, P.E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 615-633.
11. Cronshaw, S.F., & Ellis, R.J. (1991). A process of investigation of self-monitoring and leader emergence. Small Group Research, 22(4), 403-420.
12. Dalessio, A.T. (1998). Using multi-source feedback for employee development and personnel decisions. In J.W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State-of-the-art in practice (pp. 278-330). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Dipboye, R.L. (1985). Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 116-127.
14. Dipboye, R.L., & dePontbriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 248-251.
15. Dobbins, G.H., Cardy, R.L., & Platz-Vieno, S.J. (1990). A contingency approach to appraisal satisfaction: An initial investigation of the joint effects of organizational variables and appraisal characteristics. Journal of Management, 16(3), 619-632.
16. Duarte, N.T., Goodson, J.R., & Klich, N.R. (1994). Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 499-521.
17. Farh, J.L., Werbel, J.D., & Bedeian, A.G. (1988). An empirical investigation of self-appraisal-based evaluation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 141-156.
18. Ferris, G.R., Judge, T.A., Rowland, K.M., & Fitzgibbons, D.E. (1994). Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: Test of a model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 101-135.
19. Fletcher, C., & Baldry, C. (2000). A study of individual differences and self-awareness in the context of multi-source feedback. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 303-319.
20. Freese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37-63.
21. Funderburg, S.A., & Levy, P.E. (1997). The influence of individual and contextual variables on 360-degree feedback system attitudes. Group & Organization Management, 22(2), 210-235.
22. Gangestad, W.W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 126(4), 530-555.
23. Giles, W.F., & Mossholder, K.W. (1990). Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 371-377.
24. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
25. Harris, C. (1988). A comparison of employee attitudes toward two performance appraisal systems. Public Personnel Management, 17(4), 443-456.
26. Hezlett, S.A., Kuncel, N.R., & Cochran, C.C. (1997, April). Individual difference predictors of self-other discrepancies in performance ratings. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
27. Ilgen, D.R., & Favero, J.L. (1985). Limits in generalization from psychological research to performance appraisal processes. Academy of Management Review, 10, 311-321.
28. Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., & Taylor, M.S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
29. Jenkins, J.M. (1993). Self-monitoring and turnover: The impact of personality on intent to leave. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 83-89.
30. Judge, T.A., & Ferris, G.R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 80-105.
31. Kilduff, M. & Day, D.D. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effect of self-monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1047-1060.
32. Korsgaard, M.A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657-669.
33. Krosnick, J.A., & Sedikides, C. (1990). Self-monitoring and self-protective biases in use of consensus information to predict one's own behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 718-728.
34. Lawler, E.E. (1967). The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 369-381.
35. London, M., & Smither, J. (1995). Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research. Personnel Psychology, 48, 803-839.
36. London, M., & Tornow, W.W. (1998). 360-degree feedback: More than a tool! In W.W. Tornow and M. London (Eds.), Maximizing the value of 360-degree feedback: A process for individual and organizational development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37. London, M., & Wohlers, A.J. (1991). Agreement between subordinate and self-ratings in upward feedback. Personnel Psychology, 44, 375-390.
38. Lublin, J.S. (1994). Turning the tables: Underlings evaluate bosses. Wall Street Journal, 4 October, B1.
39. McEvoy, G.M., & Buller, P.F. (1987). User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 40, 785-797.
40. Mohrman, A.M., & Lawler, E.E. (1981). Improving the contextual fit of appraisal systems. Paper presented at the 89th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August.
41. Mount, M.K. (1983). Comparisons of managerial and employee satisfaction with a performance appraisal system. Personnel Psychology, 36, 99-110.
42. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M. (1982). Employee organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
43. Murphy, K., & Cleveland, J. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
45. Riggio, R.E., & Cole, E.J. (1992). Agreement between subordinate and superior ratings of supervisory performance and effects on self and subordinate job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 151-158.
46. Smither, J, W., London, M., Vasilopoulos, N.L., Reilly, R.R., Millsap, R.E., & Salvemini, N. (1995). An examination of the effects of an upward feedback program overtime. Personnel Psychology, 48, 1-34.
47. Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30, 526-537.
48. Snyder, M., & Campbell, B.H. (1982). Self-monitoring: The self in action. In J. Suis (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Volume 1, pp. 185-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Snyder, M., & Copeland, J. (1989). Self-monitoring processes in organizational settings. In R. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 7-19). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125-139.
51. Somers, M.J., & Birnbaum, D. (1991). Assessing self-appraisal of job performance as an evaluation device: Are the poor results a function of method or methodology? Human Relations, 44(10), 1081-1091.
52. Vroom, V.H. (1959). Some personality determinants of the effects of participation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 322-327.
53. Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
54. Waldman, D.A. (1997). Predictors of employee preferences for multirater and group-based performance appraisal. Group & Organization Management, 22(2), 264-287.
55. Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., & Antonioni, D. (1998). Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 86-94.
56. Walker, A.G., & Smither, J.W. (1999). A five-year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psychology, 52, 393-423.
57. Warech, M.A., Smither, J.W, Reilly, R.R., Millsap, R.E., & Reilly, S.P. (1998). Self-monitoring and 360 degree-ratings. Leadership Quarterly, 9(4), 449-473.
58. Webb, W.M., Marsh, K.L., Schneiderman, W., & Davis, B. (1989). Interaction between self-monitoring and manipulated states of self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 70-80.