A social psychological approach to enduring rivalries

Political Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 693-725

  Thies, Cameron G ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dissonance; Enduring rivalry; International system; Mechanisms; Social proof; Socialization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035639497     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00259     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Barnett, M. (1993). Institutions, roles, and disorder: The case of the Arab states system. International Studies Quarterly, 37, 271-296.
2. Bennett, D. S. (1996). Security, bargaining, and the end of interstate rivalry. International Studies Quarterly, 40, 157-184.
3. Bennett, D. S. (1997). Measuring rivalry termination, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 227-254.
4. Bennett, D. S. (1998). Integrating and testing models of rivalry duration. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1200-1232.
5. Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. American Review of Sociology, 12, 67-92.
6. Bukovansky, M. (1997). American identity and neutral rights from independence to the war of 1812. International Organization, 51, 209-243.
7. Cialdini, R. (1993). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: Quill.
8. Cioffi-Revilla, C. (1998). The political uncertainty of interstate rivalries: A punctuated equilibrium model. In P. F. Diehl (Ed.), The dynamics of enduring rivalries (pp. 64-97). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
9. Diehl, P. F. (1985). Contiguity and military escalation in major power rivalries, 1816-1980. Journal of Politics, 47, 1203-1211.
10. Diehl, P. F. (1998). Introduction: An overview and some theoretical guidelines. In P. F. Diehl (Ed.), The dynamics of enduring rivalries (pp. 1-25). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
11. Diehl, P. F. (2000). War and peace in international rivalry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
12. Elster, J. (1998). A plea for mechanisms. In P. Hedstrom & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 45-73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Geller, D. S. (1993). Power differentials and war in rival dyads. International Studies Quarterly, 37, 173-193.
15. Gochman, C. S., & Maoz, Z. (1984). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28, 585-615.
16. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1992). The empirical importance of enduring rivalries. International Interactions, 18, 151-163.
17. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1993). Enduring rivalries: Theoretical constructs and empirical patterns. International Studies Quarterly, 37, 147-171.
18. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1995). The initiation and termination of enduring rivalries: The impact of political shocks. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 30-52.
19. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1996). Taking "enduring" out of enduring rivalry: The rivalry approach to war and peace. International Interactions, 21, 291-308.
20. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1997). Linking risky dyads: An evaluation of the relation between enduring rivalries. In G. Schneider & P. A. Weitsman (Eds.), Enforcing cooperation: Risky states and intergovernmental management of conflict (pp. 132-160). New York: St. Martin's.
21. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1998). The "volcano model" and other patterns in the evolution of enduring rivalries. In P. F. Diehl (Ed.), The dynamics of enduring rivalries (pp. 98-125). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
22. Goldstein, J., & Freeman, J. (1990). Three-way street: Strategic reciprocity in world politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press.
24. Hedstrom, P. (1998). Rational imitation. In P. Hedstrom & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 306-327). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hedstrom, P., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Hensel, P. R. (1994). One thing leads to another. Recurrent militarized disputes in Latin America, 1816-1986. Journal of Peace Research, 31, 281-297.
27. Hensel, P. R. ( 1996). Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and interstate conflict 1816-1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15, 43-73.
28. Hensel, P. R. (1998). The evolution of the Franco-German rivalry. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Great power rivalries (pp. 86-121). Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press.
29. Huth, P. K. (1996). Enduring rivalries and territorial disputes, 1950-1990. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15, 7-41.
30. Huth, P., Gelpi, C., & Bennett, D. S. (1993). The escalation of great power militarized disputes: Testing rational deterrence theory and structural realism. American Political Science Review, 87, 609-623.
31. Huth, P., & Russett, B. (1993). General deterrence between enduring rivals: Testing three competing models. American Political Science Review, 87, 61-72.
32. Ikenberry, G. J., & Kupchan, C. A. (1990). Socialization and hegemonic power. International Organization, 44, 283-315.
33. Jackson, R. H. (1990). Quasi-states: Sovereignty, international relations, and the third world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Keunne, R. E. (1989). Conflict management in mature rivalry. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 33, 554-566.
36. Kuran T. (1998). Social mechanisms of dissonance reduction. In P. Hedstrom & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 147-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Mansbach, R. W., & Vasquez, J. A. (1981). In search of theory: A new paradigm for global politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
38. Maoz, Z. (1989). Joining the club of nations: Political development and international conflict, 1816-1976. International Studies Quarterly, 33, 199-231.
39. Mercer, J. (1995). Anarchy and identity. International Organization, 49, 229-252.
40. Modelski, G. (1987). Long cycles in world politics. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
41. Moreland, R. L. (1985). Social categorization and the assimilation of "new" group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1173-1190.
42. Organski, A. F. K., & Kugler, J. (1980). The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Rajmaira, S. (1997). Indo-Pakistani relations: Reciprocity in long-term perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 41, 547-560.
44. Resende-Santos, J. (1996). Anarchy and the emulation of military systems: Military organization and technology in South America, 1870-1930. Security Studies, 5, 193-260.
45. nd ed., pp. 488-567). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
46. Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
47. Schimmelfennig, F. (2000). International socialization in the new Europe: Rational action in an institutional environment. European Journal of International Relations, 6, 109-139.
48. Small, M., & Singer, J. D. (1982). Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49. Sorokin, G. L. (1994). Arms, alliance, and security tradeoffs in enduring rivalries. International Studies Quarterly, 38, 421-446.
50. Spruyt, H. (1994). The sovereign and its competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Stinchcombe, A. (1998). Monopolistic competition as a mechanism: Corporations, universities and nation-states in competitive fields. In P. Hendstrom & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 267-305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Stokes, R., & Hewitt, J. P. (1976). Aligning actions. American Sociological Review, 41, 838-849.
53. rd ed., pp. 311-378). New York: Random House.
54. Thompson, W. R. (1995). Principal rivalries. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 195-223.
55. Thompson, W. R. (1998). The evolution of a great power rivalry: The Anglo-American case. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Great power rivalries (pp. 201-221). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
56. Vasquez, J. A. (1993). The war puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Vasquez, J. A. (1996). Distinguishing rivals that go to war from those that do not: A quantitative comparative case study of the two paths to war. International Studies Quarterly, 40, 531-558.
58. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
59. Waltz, K. N. (1993). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18, 44-79.
60. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 41, 335-370.
61. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Wentworth, W. M. (1980). Context and understanding: An inquiry into socialization theory. New York: Elsevier.