Change and stability with respect to attitudes and practices related to marriage in Ashkabat, Baku, and Ankara: Three Turkic cultures

International Journal of Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 108-120

  Hortaçsu, Nuran ^a   Baştuǧ, Sharon Ş ^a   Muhammetberdiev, Ovez ^b  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Galkynyh Foundation   (Turkmenistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035634471     PISSN: 00207594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207590042000155     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alstadt, A. (1992). The Azerbaijani Turks: Power and identity under Russian rule. Stanford, CT: Hoover Institution.
2. Applbaum, K.D. (1995). Marriage with the proper stranger: Arranged marriage in metropolitan Japan. Ethnology, 34, 37-51.
3. Atalay, B., Konta, M., Beyazit, S., & Madenoǧlu, K. (1992). Türk aile yapisi araştirmasi (Investigation of Turkish family structure). Devlet Planlama Teşkilati Sosyal Planlama Genel Müdürlüǧü Aratirma Dairesi. Yayin no: DPT: 313-SPGM: 421. Ankara: DPT matbaasi.
4. Berkes N. (1973). Türkiyede çaǧdalaşma (Laicism in Turkey). Ankara: Bilgi Yayinevi.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1988). Interacting systems in human development. Research paradigms: Present and future. In N. Bolger, A. Caspi, G. Downey, & M. Moorehouse (Eds.), Persons in context: Developmental processes (pp. 25-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cinnirella, M. (1998). Exploring temporal aspects of social identity: The concept of possible social identities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 227-248.
7. Dion, K.K., & Dion, K.L. (1996). Cultural perspectives on romantic love. Personal Relationships, 3, 5-18.
8. Doǧan, İ. (1992). Tanzimat sonrasi sosyo-kültürel deǧişmeler ve Türk ailesi (Socio-cultural change in Turkish family after Tanzimat). En E. Erverdi (Ed.), Sosyo-kültürel deǧişme sürecinde Türk ailesi: Vol 1 (Turkish family within the process of sociocultural change) (pp. 176-196). Ankara: T.C. Babakanlik Aile Kurumu Yayinlari. No. 71.
9. Duben, A., & Behar, C. (1991). Istanbul households: Marriage, family and fertility 1880-1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Elder, G.H. Jr, & Caspi, A. (1988). Human development and social change: An emerging perspective on the life course. In N. Bolger, A. Caspi, G. Downey, & M. Moorehouse (Eds.), Persons in context: Developmental processes (pp. 77-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Elder, G.H. Jr, & Hareven, T.K. (1993). Rising above life's disadvantages: From the great depression to war. In G.H. Elder Jr, J. Modell, & R.D. Parke (Eds.), Children in time and place (pp. 47-72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Feldman, S.S., & Rosenthal, D.A. (1990). The acculturation of autonomy expectations in Chinese high schoolers residing in two Western nations. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 259-281.
13. Fiske, A.P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
14. Gaines S.O. et al. (1997). Links between race/ethnicity and cultural values as mediated by racial/ethnic identity and moderated by gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1460-1476.
15. Golden, P.B. (1972). The migration of the Oguz. Archivum Ottomanicum, 4, 44-84.
16. Goode, P.B. (1971). World revolution and family patterns. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 624-635.
17. Goodwin, R. (1999). Personal relationships across cultures. London: Routledge.
18. Güler, A. (1992). lk yazili Türkçe metinlerde aile ve unsurlari (Family and its elemants in first Turkish written texts). In E. Erverdi (Ed.), Sosyo-kültürel Deǧişme sürecinde Türk ailesi: Vol 1 (Turkish family within the process of sociocultural change) (pp. 68-81). Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlik Aile Araştirma Kurumu.
19. Heyat, F. (2000). Azeri women's life strategies in the Soviet context. In F. Acar & A. Güneş-Ayata (Eds.), Gender and identity construction: Women of Central Asia, Caucasus and Turkey (pp. 177-201). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
20. Hortaçsu, N. (1995). Prelude to marriage in Ankara: Educational level, reasons for marriage, feelings for spouse and families. Boǧaziçi Journal, 9, 185-205.
21. Hortaçsu, N., & Baştuǧ, S,. (1996). Türuk Kültürlerindeki kentsel ailede gelenek görenek ve deǧerler. Türkiye, Azerbeycan ve Türkmenistanda aile (Traditions, conventions and values in urban Turkish families: Family in Turkey, Azerbaijcan and Turmenistan). Project report presented to Turkish Ministry of Culture.
22. Hortaçsu, N., & Baştuǧ, S,. (2000). Women in marriage in Ashkabat, Bakü and Ankara. In F. Acar & A. Güneş-Ayata (Eds.), Gender and identity construction: Women of Central Asia, Caucasus and Turkey (pp. 77-100). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
23. Işin, E. (1992). Tanzimat ailesi ve modern adab-i muaeret. (Tanzimat family and modern etiquette). In E. Erverdi (Ed.), Sosyo-kültürel deǧişme sürecinde Türk ailesi: Vol 1 (Turkish family within the process of sociocultural change) (pp. 217-227). Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlik Aile Kurumu.
24. Kaǧitçibaşi, Ç. (1990). Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 37 (pp. 135-200). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
25. Kaǧitçibaşi, Ç. (1996). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1, 180-186.
26. Kamo, Y. (1993). Determinants of marital satisfaction: A comparison of the United States and Japan. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 551-558.
27. Lee, G.R., & Stone, L.H. (1980). Mate-selection systems and criteria: Variation according to family structure. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 319-326.
28. Lee, L.C., Huang, L.N., & Lew, A. (1998). Families: Life-span socialization in a cultural context. In L.C. Lee & N.W.S. Zane (Eds.), Handbook of Asian American psychology (pp. 83-135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Levinger, G. (1992). Figure versus ground: Micro and macro perspectives on personal relationships. Invited address to the Fifth International Conference on Personal Relationships. Oxford, England.
30. Lindeman, M., & Koskela, P. (1994). Group size, controllability of group membership, and comparative dimensions as determinants of intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 267-278.
31. Malhotra, A., & Tsui, A.O. (1996). Marriage timing in Sri Lanka: The role of modern norms and ideas. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 476-490.
32. Morgan, S.P., & Hirosima, K. (1983). The persistence of extended family residence in Japan: An anachronism or alternative strategy. American Sociological Review, 48, 269-281.
33. Muhammetberdiev, O. (1990). Unpublished data.
34. Nebiyev, A. (1993). Merasimler, adetler, algişlar. (Celebrations, conventions, traditions). Baku, Azerbaijan: Azerbaycan Uşak folkloru kitabhanesi.
35. Phalet, K., & Claeys, W. (1993). A comparative study of Turkish and Belgian Youth. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 319-343.
36. Realo, A., Allik, J., & Vadi, M. (1997). The hierarchical structure of collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 93-116.
37. Rhee, E., Uleman, J.S., & Lee, H.K. (1996). Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1037-1054.
38. Rosenthal, P.C., Bell, R., Demetriou, A., & Efklides, A. (1989). From collectivism to individualism? The acculturation of Greek immigrants in Austria. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 57-71.
39. Salaf, J.W. (1973). The emerging conjugal relationship in the People's Republic of China. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35, 705-717.
40. Saray, M. (1989). The Turkmens in the age of imperialism: A study of the Turkmen people and their incorporation into the Russian Empire. Atatürk Supreme Council for Culture. Language and History Publication of Historical Society Serial VII no. 103 Ankara: Turkish Historical Society Printing House.
41. Siu-Kai, L. (1981). Chinese familism in an urban-industrial setting: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 977-992.
42. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
43. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Triandis, H.C. (1997). Cross-cultural perspectives on personality. In R. Hogan (Ed.), Handbook of personality and psychology (pp. 439-464). New York: Academic Press.
45. Triandis, H.C., & Gelfand, M.J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
46. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
47. Twining, D. (1993). The new Eurasia: A guide to the Republics of the Former Soviet Union. Westport, CN: Praeger Press.
48. Verna, G., Chan, Y.M., Bagley, C., Sham, S., Darby, D., Woodrow, D., & Skinner, G. (1999). Chinese adolescents in Britain and Hong Kong: Identity and aspirations. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
49. Ward, C., & Rana-Deuba, A. (1999). Acculturation and adaptation revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 422-442.
50. Watkins, D., et al. (1998). Cultural dimensions, gender, and the nature of self-concept: A 14-country study. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 17-31.
51. Yee, B.W.K., Huang, L.N., & Lew, A. (1998). Life-span socialization in a cultural context. In L.C. Lee & N.W.S. Zane (Eds.), Handbook of Asian American psychology (pp. 83-135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.