Us school reform policy, state accountability systems and the limited english proficient student

Journal of Education Policy

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 163-178

  Reyes, Pedro ^a   Rorrer, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035631963     PISSN: 02680939     EISSN: 14645106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02680930010025806     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. AUGUST, D. and HAKUTA, K. (1998) Educating Language-Minority Children (Washington, DC: National Academy Press)
2. AUGUST, D., HAKUTA, K. and POMPA, D. (1994) For all students: Limited English proficient students and Goals 2000. National Center for Bilingual Education Focus: Occasional papers in Bilingual Education, 10. Available online: http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/focus/focus10.htm. Accessed: December 1999
3. BALL, S. J. (1994) Education Reform: A Critical and Post-structural Approach (Buckingham, UK: Open University Press)
4. BERLINER, D. and B IDDLE, B. (1995) The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and The Attack on America’s Public School (New York: Addison-Wesley)
5. BLACKMORE, J. (1999) Troubling Women: Feminism, Leadership and Educational Change (Buckingham, UK: Open University Press)
6. CLUNE, W. (1993) Systemic educational policy: A conceptual framework, in S. Fuhrman (ed.). Designing Coherent Education Policy: Improving the System (San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass), 125-140
7. COLLIER, V. (1992) A synthesis of studies examing long-term language minority student data on academic achievement. BilingualResearchJournal, 61: 187-213
8. CRAWFORD, J. (1998) Languagepoliticsin theU.S.A.: Theparadox ofbilingual education, SocialJustice, 25: 50-70
9. CUMMINS, J. (1986) Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56 (1): 18-36
10. DARLING-HAMMOND, L. (1994) Standards of Practicefor Learner-Centered Schools, in R.Berneand L. Picus (eds) OutcomeEquity inEducation (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press), 191-223
11. DIN, F. S. (1996) Theimp actofKentucky statetesting oneducational practicesinKentucky public schools. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of theEastern Educational Research Association, Cambridge, MA
12. DORN, S. (1998) The Political Legacy of School Accountability Systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 6. Available on-line: http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa.Zv6n1.html Accessed: December, 1999
13. ELMORE, R., ABELMANN, C. and FUHRMAN, S. (1996) The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance, in H.F. Ladd (ed.). Holding Schools Accountable: Performance-basedReform inEducation (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution), 65 98
14. FERNANDEZ, R. and SHU, G. (1988) School dropouts: Approaches to an enduring problem. Education and Urban Society, 20: 363-386
15. GARCIA, E. E. (1995) Educating Mexican American Students: Past treatment and recent developments in theory, research, policy, and practice. Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, (Simon and Schuster McMillan: New York)
16. GEISINGER K. (1992) Testing limited English proficient students for minimum competency and high school graduation Proceedings of the Second National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues: Focus on Evaluation and Measurement. Obemla, 1992. Available On-line: http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/symposia/second/vol2/testing.htm Accessed: November, 1999
17. GREENWALD, E., PERSKY, H., CAMPBELL, J. and MAZZEO, J. (1999) NAEP 1998 Writing: Report Card for the Nation and the States (Washington, DC: TheNational Center for Educational Statistics)
18. GRISSMER D. and FLANAGA, A. (1998) ExploringRapidAchievement Gains in North Carolinaand Texas (Washington, DC: National Education Goals)
19. GRONNA, S., JENKINS, A. and CHIN-CHANCE, S. (1998) The performance of students with disabilities in a norm-referenced, statewidestandardized testing programme, JournalofLearning Disabilities, 31: 482-494
20. HAN, M., BAKER, D. and Rodriguez, G. (1997) SASS 1993-94: A Profile of Policies and Practices for Limited English Proficient Students: Screening Methods, Program Support, and Teacher Training (Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics)
21. HANCOCK, C. (1994) Alternative Assessment and Second Language Study: What and Why? (ERIC Digest ED376695), (Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics)
22. HEUBERT, J. P., and HAUSER R. M. (2000) HighStakes: TestingforTracking, Promotion, andGraduation, (Washington, DC: National Academy Press)
23. INGERSOLL, R. (1996) National Assessments of Teacher Quality (Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Education)
24. INTERNATIONAL READING ASSOCIATION (1999) High-stakes assessments in reading, Journal of the International Reading Association, May: 257-263
25. JERALD, C., and BOSER U. (1999) Quality Counts 1999: Taking Stock. Education Weekonthe Web. AvailableOnline: http://www.edweek.org/sreports/qc99/ac/tables/ac-intro.htm Accessed November 1999
26. KAUFMAN, P. and FRASE, M. (1990) DropoutRates in the United States, 1989. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics
27. LACELLEPETERSON, M. and RIVERA, C. (1994) Is itreal for all kids?A framework for equitableassessment policies for English LanguageLearners, HarvardEducationalReview, 64: 55-75
28. LACHAT, M. (1999) Standards, Equity, and Cultural Diversity (Providence, RI: Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory)
29. LINN, R.L. (2000) Assessmentandaccountability. EducationalResearcher, 29 (2): 4-16
30. LIU, K., SPICUZZA, R. and ERICKSON, R. (1999) Focus-group research on Minnesota’simplementation ofgradua-tion standards, TheJournal ofEducational Research, 92: 312
31. MCNEIL, L. and VATENZJET, A A. (2000) The harmful impact of theTAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. Available on-line: http://www.law.harvard.edu/groups/civilrights/conferences/testing98/drafts/mcneilvalenzuela.html Accessed: January, 2000
32. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, FAMILIES AND LEARNING (1999) Minnesota's Graduation Standards Availableon-line children@state.mn.us Accessed December, 1999
33. MURNANE, R. and LEVY, F. (1998) Standards, information, and the demand for student achievement, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 4: 117-124. (Transcript of presentation at theExcellencein Education: Views on Improving American Education Conference)
34. NATIONAL Cent er Of EDU CATI ON S TATI STI CS (N CES) (1991) The Condition of Education, Volume 1, Elementary and Secondary Education, (Washington, DC: US Department of Education and National Center for Education Statistics)
35. NATIONAL CENTEROF EDUCATION STATISTICS (NCES) (1998) The Condition of Education, 1997 (Washington, DC:US Department of Education and National Center for Education Statistics)
36. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON Excellence IN EDUCATION (1983) A Nation at Risk: The Imperatives for Educational Reform (Washington, DC: U.S. Department ofEducation)
37. NATRIELLO, G. and PALLAS, A. (1999) The development and impact of high stakes testing, The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. Paper first presented at the High Stakes K-12 testing conference 1998. Available on-line: http://www.law.harvard.edu/groups/civilrights/conferences/testing98/drafts/natriello99.html Accessed: December, 1999
38. NAVARRETE, C. and GUSTKE, C. (1996) A guide to performance assessment for linguistically diverse students, National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education (Albuquerque, New Mexico: EAC West). Available on-line http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/miscpubs/eacwest/perform.htm Accessed: December, 1999
39. NEWMAN, F., KING, M. B. and RIGDON, M. (1997) Accountability and school performance: Implications from Restructuring schools, HarvardEducational Review, 67: 41-74
40. O’DAY, J. and SMITH, M. (1993) Systemic reform and educational opportunity, in S. Fuhrman (ed.) Designing Coherent Education Policy: Improving the System (San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass), 250-312
41. OLSON, J and GOLDSTEIN, A (1996) The Inclusion of Students with Disabilities and Limited English Proficient Students in Large Scale Assessments: A Summary of Recent Progress (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education and National Center for Education Statistics)
42. OLSON, L. (1999) Quality Counts 99: Shining a spotlight on success. Education Week: 8. Also available on-line http://www.edweek.org/sreports/qc99/ac/mc/mc-intro.htm Accessed: January 2000
43. PAREDESSCRIBNER, A. (1999) Using student advocacy assessment practices, in P. Reyes, A. Paredes-Scribner, and J. Scribner (eds). Lessons from High-performing Hispanic Schools: Creating Learning Communities (New York: Teachers CollegePress), 169-187
44. PRESIDENT’S ADVISORY COMMISSION ON EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FORHISPANIC AMERICANS (1996) Our Nation on the Fault Line: Hispanic American Education. White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. (Washington, DC: Author)
45. RIVERA, C., VINCENT, C., HAFNER, A. and LACELLE PETERSON, M. (1997) Statewide Assessment Programs: Policies and Practices of the Inclusion of Limited English Proficient Students (ERIC Digest ED421484), (ERIC Clearinghouse onAssessment andEvaluation WashingtonDC)
46. SKRLA, L. and SCHEURICH, J. J. (2000) Accountability for Equity: Can State Policy Leverage Social Justice?, Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of theAmerican Research Association, New Orleans, LA
47. SLEE, R., WEINER, G. and TOMLINSON, S. (1998) School Effectiveness for Whom?: Challenges to the School Effectiveness andSchool ImprovementMovements, (London: Falmer Press)
48. TEXAS EDUCATIONAGENCY (1996a) TexasAdministrativeCode, (Austin, TX:Author)
49. TEXAS EDUCATIONAGENCY (1996b) TheDevelopmen ofAccountability Systems Nationwide and in Texas (Austin, TX: Author)
50. TEXAS EDUCATIONAGENCY (1997a) TexasSchoolLaw Bulletin, TexasEducationCode (Austin, TX:Author)
51. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY (1997b) Expanding the scope of the Texas public school accountability system (Austin, TX: Author)
52. TEXAS EDUCATIONAGENCY (1999a) State Board of Education Meeting: Proposed amendment to 19TAC101.3, Testing Accommodations and Exemptions (Second Reading and Final Adoption) (Austin, TX: Author). Available on-line: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/sboe/schedule/9911/101-003.html. Accessed: December, 1999
53. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY (1999b) An overview of the Academic Excellence Indicator System for the State of Texas, (Austin, TX: Author). Available on-line: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/about.aeis.html Accessed: December, 1999
54. TEXAS EDUCATIONAGENCY (1999c) Pocket Edition 1998-99 Texas Public School Statistics (Austin, TX. Author). Availableon-line: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/per/report/pocked/99/ Accessed: December, 1999
55. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY (1999d) State Board of Education Meeting: Attachment I: Statutory Citation Relating to Proposed Amendment to 19 TAC 101.3, Testing Accommodations and Exemptions (Austin, TX: Author). Available on-line: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/sboe/schedule/9911/101-003stat.html. Accessed: December, 1999
56. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (USDE) (1994) Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994, (Washington, DC: Author). Available on-line http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA/toc.html. Accessed: November, 1999
57. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (USDE) (1996) Descriptive Study of Services to Limited English Proficient students (Washington, DC: Author). Available on-line. http://www.ed.gov/offices/OUS/eval/esed/ lep.html Accessed: December, 1999
58. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION (USDE) (1997) 1993-94 Schools and Staffing Survey: A Profile of Policies and Practices for Limited English Proficient Students: Screening Methods, Program Support, and Teacher Training (Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics)
59. UNITED States DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION (USDE) (1999a) Teacher Quality: A Report on the Preparation and Qualifications of Public School Teachers (Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department ofEducation)
60. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION (USDE) (1999b) The Educational Excellence for All Children Act of 1999 (Washington, DC: Author)
61. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION (USDE) (1999c) Title VII Helping LEP Students Learn English and Reach High Standards (Washington, DC: Author)
62. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF BILINGUAL EDUCATION AND MINORITY LANGUAGES AFFAIRS (OBEMLA) (1996) General Questions on Bilingual Education (Washington, DC: Author)
63. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF BILINGUAL EDUCATION AND MINORITY LANGUAGES AFFAIRS (OBEMLA) (1998) Facts AboutLimitedEnglish Proficient Students (Washington, DC: Author)
64. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, SAN ANTONIO DIVISION. (2000) GI Forum, Image de Tejas, Rhonda Boozer, Melissa Marie Cruz, Michelle Marie Cruz, Leticia Ann Faz, Elizabeth Garza, Mark Garza, Alfred Lee Hicks, Brandye R. Johnson, Jocqulyn Russell (Plaintiffs) v. Texas Education Agency, Dr. Mike Moses, Members and The State Board of Education, in their official capacities. Civil Action No. SA-97-CA-1278-EP