The Separation of Action and Perception and the Issue of Affordances

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 167-172

  Van Der Kamp, John ^a   Savelsbergh, Geert J P ^a   Rosengren, Karl S ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035612124     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15326969ECO1302_9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aglioti, S., Goodale, M. A., & DeSouza, J. F. X. (1993). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Bennett, S.J., van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Davis, K. (1999). Timing a one-handed catch: I. Effects of telestereoscopic viewing. Experimental Brain Research, 129, 362-368.
3. Bennett, S. J., van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Davis, K. (2000). Discriminating the role of binocular information in the timing of a one-handed catch: The effects of telestereoscopic viewing and ball size. Experimental Brain Research, 135, 341-347.
4. Goodale, M. A., & Haffenden, A. (1998). Frames of reference for perception and action in the human visual system. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 22, 167-172.
5. Goodale, M. A., & Humphrey, G. K. (1998). The objects of action and perception. Cognition, 67, 181-207.
6. Gray, R., & Regan, D. (1998). Accuracy of estimating time-to-collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research, 38, 499-512.
7. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
8. Marotta, J. J., Behrmann, M., & Goodale, M. A. (1997). The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research, 116, 113-121.
9. Michaels, C. F. (2000). Information, perception and action: What should ecological psychologists learn from Milner and Goodale (1995). Ecological Psychology, 12, 241-258.
10. Michaels, C. F., Zeinstra, E., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2001). Information and action in punching a falling ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 69-93.
11. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12. Mon-Williams, M., & Tresilian, J. R. (1999). The size-distance paradox is a cognitive phenomenon. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 578-582.
13. Rushton, S. K., & Wann, J. P. (1999). Weighted combination of size and disparity: A computational model for timing a ball catch. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 186-190.
14. Savelsbergh, G. J. P., Whiting, H. T. A., & Bootsma, R. J. (1991). Grasping tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 315-322.
15. van der Kamp, J. (1999). The information-based regulation of interceptive timing. Nieuwegein, The Netherlands: Digital Printing Partners Utrecht.
16. van der Kamp, J., Bennett, S. J., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Davis, K. (1999). Timing a one-handed catch: II. Adaptation to telestereoscopic viewing. Experimental Brain Research, 129, 369-377.
17. van der Kamp, J., & Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (2000). [One-or two-hand grasping: The effects of the Titchener illusion]. Unpublished raw data.
18. van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G. J. P, & Bennett, S. J. (1998). Do we report what we see and do? In B. Bril, A. Ledebt, G. Dietrich, & A. Roby-Brami (Eds.), Advances in perception-action coupling (pp. 45-49). Paris: Editions EDK.
19. van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G. J. P, & Smeets, J. (1997). Multiple information sources in interceptive timing. Human Movement Sciences, 16, 787-821.