The impact of same-sex LMX dyads on performance evaluations

Human Resource Management

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 309-320

  Varma, Arup ^a   Stroh, Linda K ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035605702     PISSN: 00904848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.1021     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abramson, P.R., Goldberg, P.A., Greenberg, J.H., & Abramson, L.M. (1977). The talking platypus phenomenon: Competency ratings as a function of sex and professional status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 114-124.
2. Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (1994), Gender bias in the selection and assessment of women in management. In M.J. Davidson & R.J. Burke (Eds.), Women in management: Current research issues (pp. 93-109). London: Paul Chapman.
3. Bartol, K.M., & Butterfield, D.A. (1976). Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 446-454.
4. Bernardin, H.J., & Beatty, R.W. (1984). Performance-appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: PWS Kent.
5. Bernardin, H.J., Hennessey, H.W., Jr., & Peyrefitte, J. (1995). Age, racial and gender bias as a function of criterion specificity: A test of expert testimony. Human Resource Management Review, 5(1), 63-77.
6. Brenner, O.C., Tomkiewicz, J.S., & Schein, V.E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662-669.
7. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.
8. Cardy, R.L., & Dobbins, G.H. (1986). Affect and appraisal accuracy: Liking as an integral dimension in evaluating performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 672-678.
9. Cohen, S.L., Bunker, K.A., Burton, A.L., & McManus, P.D. (1978). Reactions of male subordinates to the sex-role congruency of immediate supervision. Sex Roles, 4, 297-311.
10. Dansereau, F., Jr., Graen, G., & Haga, W.J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations - A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
11. Deluga, R.J. (1998). Leader-member exchange quality and effectiveness ratings: The role of subordinate-supervisor conscientiousness similarity. Group & Organization Management, 23, 189-217.
12. Dienesch, R.M.S., & Liden, R.C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618-634.
13. Eagly, A.H. & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
14. Engle, E.E., & Lord, R.G. (1997). Implicit theories, selr-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 988-1010.
15. Fairhurst, G.T. (1993). The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs, 60, 321-351.
16. Gilligan, C. (1979). Woman's place in man's life cycle. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 431-446.
17. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and woman's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18. Graen, G. (1976). Role making processes within complex organizations. In M.D. Dunette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201-1245). Chicago: Rand McNally.
19. Graen, G. & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J.G. Hunt & L.L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143-165). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
20. Graen, G., Liden, R., & Hoel, W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawl process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 868-872.
21. Graen, G., & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Volume 9, pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22. Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Womens way of leadership. New York: Doubleday.
23. Lagace, R.R., Castleberry, S.B., & Ridnour, R.E. (1993). An exploratory salesforce study of the relationship between leader-member exchange and motivation, role stress, and manager evaluation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 9, 110-119.
24. Liden, R.C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465.
25. Liden, R.C., & Maslyn, J.M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43-72.
26. Liden, R.C., & Mitchell, T.R. (1988). Ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 13, 572-587.
27. Phillips, A.S., & Bedeian, A.G. (1994). Leader-follower exchange quality: The role of personal and interpersonal attributes. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 990-1001.
28. Pulakos, E.D., & Wexley, K.N. (1983). The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 129-139.
29. Pulakos, E.D., White, L.A., Oppler, S.H., & Borman, W.C. (1989). Examination of rater and sex effects on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 770-780.
30. Robbins, T.E. & DeNisi, A.S. (1994). Interpersonal affect and cognitive processing in performance appraisal: Toward closing the gap. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 341-350.
31. Rosener, J.B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 119-133.
32. Sackett, P.R., DuBois, Cathy, L.Z., & Noe, A.W. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and white-black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 263-267.
33. Schein, V.E., Mueller, R., & Jacobson, C. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among college students. Sex Roles, 20, 103-110.
34. Schein, V.E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager - think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33-41.
35. Tsui, A.S., & Barry, B. (1986). Interpersonal affect and rating errors. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 586-599.
36. Turban, D.B., & Jones, A.P. (1998). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228-234.
37. Varma, A., DeNisi, A.S., & Peters, L.H. (1996). Interpersonal affect and performance appraisal: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 49(2), 341-360.
38. Vecchio, R.P. & Gobdel, B.C. (1984). The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and perspectives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 5-20.
39. Wayne, S.J., & Ferris, G.R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-499.
40. Wayne, S.J., Shore, L.M., & Liden, R.C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111.