Game theory and juries: A miraculous result

Journal of Theoretical Politics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 425-435

  Margolis, Howard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognition; Convictions; Game theory; Juries

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035594839     PISSN: 09516298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0951692801013004005     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bar Hillel, Maya (1989) 'How to Solve Probability Teasers', Philosophy of Science 56: 348-58.
2. Coughlin, Peter J. (2000) 'In Defense of Unanimous Jury Verdicts', American Political Science Review (Jun): 94: 375-94.
3. Guarnaschelli, S. R. D. McKelvey and T. R. Palfrey (2000) 'An Experimental Study of Jury Decisions', American Political Science Review 94: 407-23.
4. Feddersen, Timothy and Wolfgang Pesendorfer (1998) 'Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts Under Strategic Voting', American Political Science Review 92 (Mar.): 23-35.
5. Feddersen, Timothy and Wolfgang Pesendorfer (1999) 'Elections, Information Aggregation and Strategic Voting', Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 96: 10572-10574 (September).
6. Margolis, H. (1998) 'Tycho's Illusion and Human Cognition', Nature 392 (30 April): 857.
7. Margolis, H. (2001a) 'Pivotal Voting', Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(1): 111-16.
8. Margolis, H. (2001b) 'Pivotal Votes and the Emperor's New Clothes', Societal Choice and Welfare, in press.
9. Shiller, R. (1999) Irrational Exuberance. New York: Norton.