Sensory and consumer investigations: Techniques for market success

Food Australia

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 583-587

  Mialon, V S ^a,b   Murray, J M ^a,c  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b MMR Food and Drink Res Worldwide   (United Kingdom)

^c Quest Intl Australia Pty Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035564079     PISSN: 10325298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Anon. 1999. Taste buds still in control. Food Engineering 71: 3, 14.
2. Cairncross, SE & Sjostrom, LB. 1950. Flavour profiles: a new approach to flavour problems. Food Technology 4: 308-311.
3. Casey, MA & Krueger, RA. 1994. Focus group interviewing. In MacFie, HJH & Thomson, DHM (eds). Measurement of Food Preferences. Blackie Academic & Professional, London: 77-96.
4. Carson, RT, Louviere, JJ, Anderson, DA, Arabie, P, Bunch, DS, Hensher, DA, Johnson, RM, Kuhfeld, WF, Steinberg, D, Swait, J, Timmermans, H & Wiley, JB. 1994. Experimental analysis of choice. Marketing Letters 5, 351-368.
5. Dijksterhuis, G. 1996. Time-intensity methodology: review and preview. Proceedings, COST96 Meeting: Interaction of food matrix with small ligands influencing flavour and texture, Dijon, France.
6. Engel, JF, Blackwell, RD & Minia, PW. 1997. Consumer Behavior. 8th Edition, Dryden Press, London.
7. Gains, N. 1994. The repertory grid approach. In MacFie, HJH & Thompson, D (eds). Measurement of Food Preferences. Blackie Academic & Professional London: 51-73.
8. Green, PE & Rao, VR. 1971. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgemental data. Journal of Marketing Research 8: 355-363.
9. Green, PE & Wind, Y. 1973. Multi-attribute decisions in marketing: A measurement approach. The Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Illinois.
10. Greenhoff, K & MacFie HJH. 1994. Preference mapping in practice. In MacFie, HJH & Thompson, D (eds). Measurement of Food Preferences. Blackie Academic & Professional London: 137-163.
11. Grunert, KG & Grunert, SC. 1995. Measuring subjective meaning structures by the laddering method: Theoretical considerations and methodological problems. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12: 209-225.
12. Kelly, GA. 1955. The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, WW (ed). New York.
13. Lawless, HT & Heymann, H. 1998. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Practices and Principals. Chapman and Hall, New York.
14. Lee, CB & Pangborn, RM. 1986.Time-intensity: the temporal aspect of sensory perception. Food Technology 40: 71-78, 82.
15. Louviere, J & Woodworth, G. 1983. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research 20: 350-367.
16. McEwan, JA. 1996. Preference mapping for product optimisation. In Naes, T & Risvik, E. (eds). Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science. Elsevier Applied Science, London: 71-102.
17. McNeil, KL, Sanders, TH & Civille, GV. 2000. Using focus groups to develop a quantitative consumer questionnaire for peanut butter. Journal of Sensory Studies 15(2): 163-178.
18. Marshall, R & Kilcast, D. 2000. A matter of taste. Chemistry and Industry 6: 210-213.
19. Meilgaard, M, Civille, GV & Carr, BT. 1991. Sensory evaluation techniques, 2nd ed. CRC, Boca Raton, New York.
20. Mialon, VM & Badts, VSM. 1999. Optimisation of the time intensity method for the food industry - A case study on panel training and assessment of panel performance. CCFRA R&D Report No 75.
21. Murray, JM & Delahunty, CM. 2000. Mapping consumer preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of Cheddar cheese. Food Quality and Preference 11: 419-435.
22. Neilson, NA, Bech-Larsen, T & Grunert, KG. 1998. Consumer purchase motives and product perceptions: a laddering study on vegetable oil in three countries. Food Quality and Preference 9: 455-466.
23. Sidel, JL & Stone, S. 1993. The role of sensory evaluation in the food industry. Food Quality and Preferences 4: 65-73.
24. Slater, M. 2000. The marketing/new product conundrum. Paper presented at 33rd AIFST Annual Convention, 20-23 August. Brisbane, Australia.
25. Stone, S & Sidel, JL. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices. 2nd Ed, Academic Press Inc, London.
26. Stone, H, Sidel, JL, Oliver, S, Woolsey, A & Singleton, RC. 1974. Sensory evaluation by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis. Food Technology 28 (11): 24-33.
27. Taylor, M. 2001. The role of innovation in the agri food chain. Food Australia 53(1,2):32-5.
28. Williams, AA & Arnold, GM. 1985. A comparison of the aroma of six coffees characterised by conventional profiling, free-choice profiling and similarity scaling methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36: 204-214.