Consumer purchase motives and product perceptions: A laddering study on vegetable oil in three countries

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 455-466

  Nielsen, N A ^a   Bech Larsen, T ^a   Grunert, K G ^a  

^a AARHUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031772768     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(98)00022-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bech-Larsen, T., Nielsen, N. A., Grunert, K. G. and Sørensen, E. (1997) Attributes of low involvement products: a comparison of five elicitation techniques and a test of their nomological validity. MAPP working paper no 43. The Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus.
2. Brunsø, K., Grunert, K. G. and Bredahl, L. (1996) An analysis of national and cross-national consumer segments using the food-related lifestyle instrument in Denmark, France, Germany and the United Kingdom. MAPP working paper no 35. The Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus.
3. Carrol J.D., Green P.E., Schaffer C.M. Interpoint distance comparisons in correspondence analysis. Journal of Marketing Research. 23:1986;271-280.
4. Douglas S.P., Craig C.S. The changing dynamic of consumer behavior: Implications for cross-cultural research. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 14:1997;379-395.
5. Fischler, J. -C. (1990) L'omnivore. Odile Jacob, Paris.
6. Gengler, Charles E. and Thomas J. Reynolds (1993) Laddermap. A Software Tool for Analyzing Laddering Data.
7. Grunert K. Food quality: A means-end perspective. Food Quality and Preference. 6:1995;171-176.
8. Grunert, K. G., Bech-Larsen, T., Nielsen, N. A. and Sørensen, E. (1996) The development of models for understanding and predicting consumer food choice - individual progress report 1996 AIR contract PL 921315. The Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus.
9. Grunert, K. G., Beckmann, S. C. and Sørensen, E. (in press) Means-end chains and laddering: an inventory of problems and an agenda for research. In Understanding Consumer Decision-making: Applications of the Means-end Perspective to Strategy Development and Assessment for products and Services, Politics, Public Policy and Philanthropic Issues. ed J. C. Olson and T. C. Reynolds. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Grunert K.G., Grunert S.C. Measuring subjective meaning structures by the laddering method: Theoretical considerations and methodological problems. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 12:1995;209-225.
11. Gutman J. A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing. 46:(2):1982;60-72.
12. Jain S.C. Standardization of international marketing strategy: Some research hypotheses. Journal of Marketing. 53:(1):1989;70-79.
13. Levitt T. The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review. 61:(3):1983;92-102.
14. Mennell, S., Murcott, A. and van Otterloo, A. (1992) The Sociology of Food, Eating, Diet and Culture. Sage, London.
15. Olson, J. C. and Reynolds, T. J. (1983) Understanding consumers cognitive structures: Implications for advertising strategy. In Advertising and consumer psychology, ed. L. Percy and A. G. Woodside, pp. 77-90. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
16. Reynolds, T. J. and Gutman, J. (1984) Laddering: Extending the repertory grid methodology to construct attribute-consequence-value hierarchies. In Personal Values and Consumer Psychology, ed. R. E. Pitts and A. G. Woodside. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
17. Reynolds T.J., Gutman J. Laddering theory, methods, analysis, and interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research. 18:(1):1988;11-31.
18. Valette-Florence P., Rapacchi B. Improving means-end chain analysis using graph theory and correspondence analysis. Journal of Advertising Research. 31:(1):1991;30-45.