Taking our seats: The consequences of positioning in reading assessments

Theory into Practice

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 166-174

  Enciso, Patricia E ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035539241     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4003_4     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. (M. Holquist, Ed.). (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Barr, M., & Thomas, A. (Eds.), (1991). The reading book. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Benton, M. (1983). Children's responses to stories. Children's Literature in Education, 10, 68-86.
4. Bloome, D., & King Dail, A.R. (1997). Toward (re)defining miscue analysis: Reading as a social and cultural process. Language Arts, 74, 610-617.
5. Calkins, L., Montgomery, K., Santman, D., with Falk, B. (1998). A teacher's guide to standardized reading tests: Knowledge is power. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43-63.
7. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching positions: Difference, pedagogy, and the power of address. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Emihovich, C. (1994). The language of testing: An ethnographic-sociolinguistic perspective on standardized tests. In K. Holland, D. Bloome, & J. Solsken (Eds.), Alternative perspectives in assessing children's language and literacy (pp. 33-54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Enciso, P. (1992). Creating the story world: Case study of a young reader's engagement strategies and stances. In J. Many & C. Cox (Eds.), Reader stance and literary understanding: Exploring the theories, research, and practice (pp. 75-102). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Enciso, P. (1996). Why engagement in reading matters to Molly. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 12, 171-194.
12. Enciso, P. (1998, December). Recovering a language for reading: A researcher-teacher perspective on the terms of inclusion in reading assessment and practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
13. Enciso, P., Cutler, C., & Miller, J. (1998). Final Report: Civil Service
14. García, G.E. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish speaking Hispanic students. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 371-392.
15. García, G.E., & Pearson, P.D. (1994). Assessment and diversity. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 20; pp. 337-392). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
16. Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In A. Iran-Nejad & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24; pp. 355-392). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
17. Golden, J., & Guthrie, J. (1986). Convergence and divergence in reader response to literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 408-421.
18. Haney, W. (1993). Testing and minorities. In L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.), Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United Stales schools (pp. 45-74). Albany: State University of New York Press.
19. Harding, D.W. (1937). On the role of the onlooker. Scrutiny, 6, 247-258.
20. Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
21. Holloway, K.F. (1994). Language, culture, and the implications of assessment. In K. Holland, D. Bloome, & J. Solsken (Eds.), Alternative perspectives in assessing children's language and literacy (pp. 11-20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 14-31). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23. Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1997). The social practices of reading. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies (pp. 185-226). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
24. Myers, W.D. (1991, January). Travelers and translators. Keynote address at The Ohio State University Children's Literature Conference, Columbus.
25. Myers, W.D. (1991). Now is your time: The African-American struggle for freedom. New York: Harper-Collins.
26. Myers, W.D. (2000). Monster. New York: Harper-Collins.
27. Ohio Department of Education. (1995). Ohio proficiency tests for Grade 4: Practice test, reading (pp. 14-23). Columbus: Author.
28. Pearson, P.D., & Hamm, D.N. (2001). The measurement of reading comprehension: A review of practices-past, future, and present. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29. Purcell-Gates, V. (1991). On the outside looking in: A study of remedial readers' meaning-making while reading literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 235-255.
30. Robb, L. (2000). Teaching reading in middle schools: A strategic approach to teaching reading that improves comprehension and thinking. New York: Scholastic.
31. Rosen, H. (1986). The importance of story. Language Arts, 63, 3, 226-237.
32. Taylor, D. (1993). From the child's point of view. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
33. Tierney, R., & Enciso, P. (1991, April). The relationship between readers' involvement in and comprehension of a fictional short story. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
34. Tierney, R.J., Carter, M., & Desai, L.E. (1991). Portfolio assessment in reading-writing classrooms. Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.