A taxonomy of student engagement with educational software: An exploration of literate thinking with electronic text

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 213-234

  Bangert Drowns, Robert L ^a   Pyke, Curtis ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035536733     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/0CKM-FKTR-0CPF-JLGR     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. National Council of Teachers of English, Standards for the English Language Arts, NCTE, District of Columbia, 1996.
2. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1997, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1997.
3. G. Gallup, Jr. The Gallup poll, Scholarly Resources, Inc., Delaware, 1998.
4. U.S. Department of Education, Teacher Survey on Professional Development and Training, FRSS 65, National Center for Education Statistics, Fast Response Survey System, 1998.
5. C. Bereiter and M. Scardamalia, An Attainable Version of High Literacy: Approaches to Teaching Higher-Order Skills in Reading and Writing, Curriculum Inquiry, 17:1, pp. 9-30, 1987.
6. R. J. Spiro and J. C. Jehng, Cognitive Flexibility and Hypertext: Theory and Technology for the Nonlinear and Multidimensional Traversal of Complex Subject Matter, in Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology, D. Nix and R. Spiro (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp. 163-205, 1990.
7. L. M. Rosenblatt, Literature as Exploration, Appleton Century, New York, 1938.
8. L. M. Rosenblatt, Continuing the Conversation: A Clarification, Research in the Teaching of English, 29:3, pp. 349-354, 1995.
9. J. A. Langer, Literature and Learning to Think, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10:3, pp. 207-226, 1995a.
10. J. A. Langer, Envisioning Literature: Literary Understanding and Literature Instruction, Teachers College Press, New York, 1995b.
11. D. D. Kumar, A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Science Instruction and Student Engagement, Educational Review, 43: 1, pp. 49-61, 1991.
12. B. K. Martens, T. A. Bradley, and T. L. Eckert, Effects of Reinforcement History and Instructions on the Persistence of Student Engagement, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30:3, pp. 569-572, 1997.
13. G. Salomon and T. Globerson, Skill May Not be Enough: The Role of Mindfulness in Learning and Transfer, International Journal of Educational Research, 11, pp. 623-637, 1987.
14. E. A. Skinner and M. J. Belmont, Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Across the School Year, Journal of Educational Psychology, 85:4, pp. 571-581, 1993.
15. T. W. Malone and M. R. Lepper, Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning, in Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, Volume 3: Conative and Affective Process Analyses, R. E. Snow and M. J. Farr (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, pp. 223-253, 1987.
16. D. I. Cordova and M. R. Lepper, Intrinsic Motivation and the Process of Learning: Beneficial Effects of Contextualization, Personalization, and Choice, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88:4, pp. 715-730, 1996.
17. R. Jacques, J. Preece, and T. Carey, Engagement as a Design Concept for Multimedia, Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 24:1, pp. 49-59, 1995.
18. J. T. Guthrie, P. Van Meter, A. D. McCann, A. Wigfield, L. Bennett., C. Poundstone, M. E. Rice, F. M. Faibisch, B. Hunt, and A. M. Mitchell, Growth of Literacy Engagement: Changes in Motivations and Strategies During Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction, Reading Research Quarterly, 31:3, pp. 306-332, 1996.
19. P. Pintrich and E. V. De Groot, Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82:1, pp. 33-40, 1990.
20. L. Corno, Best-Laid Plans: Modern Conceptions of Volition and Educational Research, Educational Researcher, 22:2, pp. 14-22, 1993.
21. L. Corno and E. B. Mandinach, The Role of Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Learning and Motivation, Educational Psychologist, 18, pp. 88-108, 1983.
22. P. R. Pintrich, R. W. Marx, and R. A. Boyle, Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change, Review of Educational Research, 63:2, pp. 167-199, 1993.
23. P. H. Winne, Inherent Details in Self-Regulated Learning, Educational Psychologist, 30:4, pp. 173-187, 1995.
24. J. T. Guthrie, Educational Contexts for Engagement in Literacy, The Reading Teacher, 49:6, pp. 432-445, 1996.
25. J. T. Guthrie, P. Van Meter, G. R. Hancock, S. Alao, E. Anderson, and A. McCann, Does Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction Increase Strategy Use and Conceptual Learning From Text? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90:2, pp. 261-278, 1998.
26. M. Nystrand and A. Gamoran, Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement, Research in the Teaching of English, 25:3, pp. 261-290, 1991.
27. O. Lee and C. W. Anderson, Task Engagement and Conceptual Change in Middle School Science Classrooms, American Educational Research Journal, 30:3, pp. 585-610, 1993.
28. M. D. Ainley, Styles of Engagement with Learning: Multidimensional Assessment of their Relationship with Strategy Use and School Achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 85:3, pp. 395-405, 1993.
29. R. A. Schwier, Learning Environments and Interaction for Emerging Technologies: Implications for Learner Control and Practice, Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 22:3, pp. 163-176, 1993.
30. E. B. Mandinach and L. Corno, Cognitive Engagement Variations among Students of Different Ability Level and Sex in a Computer Problem Solving Game, Sex Roles 13:3-4, pp. 241-251, 1985.
31. M. Scardamalia, C. Bereiter, R. S. McLean, J. Swallow, and E. Woodruff, Computer Supported Intentional Learning Environments, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5:1, pp. 51-68, 1989.
32. M. Lamon, C. Chan, M. Scardamalia, P. J. Burtis, and C. Brett, Beliefs about Learning and Constructive Processes in Reading: Effects of a Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environment (CSILE), paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, Georgia, 1993.
33. M. J. Jacobson and R. J. Spiro, Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12:4, pp. 301-333, 1995.
34. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Intrinsic Rewards and Emergent Motivation, in The Hidden Costs of Reward, M. R. Lepper and D. Greene (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp. 205-216, 1976.
35. R. H. Ennis, A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities, in Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, J. B. Baron and R. J. Sternberg (eds.). Freeman, New York, pp. 9-26, 1987.
36. M. Brown, Arthur's Teacher Trouble, Broderbund Software, Inc., California, 1992.
37. M. Boekaerts, Self-Regulated Learning: A New Concept Embraced by Researchers, Policy-Makers, Educators, Teacher, and Students, Learning and Instruction 7:2, pp. 161-186, 1997.