Cheese hardness assessment by experts and untrained judges

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 277-285

  González, Remedios ^a   Benedito, Josæ ^b   Cárcel, Juan A ^b   Mulet, Antonio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b Dept of Food Technology Universitat Polit�cnica de València Camino de Vera s/n ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035534399     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2001.tb00301.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BOURNE, M.C. 1975. Method for obtaining compression and shear coefficients of foods using cylindrical punches. J. Texture Studies 5, 459-469.
2. BOURNE, M.C. 1978. Texture profile analysis. Food Technol. 32, 62-66, 72.
3. BROWN, W.E., GERAULT, S. and WAKELING, I. 1996a. Diversity of meat tenderness and juiciness by consumers: A time-intensity study. J. Texture Studies 27, 475-492.
4. BROWN, W.E., LANGLEY, K.R., MIOCHE, L., MARIE, S., GERAULT, S. and BRAXTON, D. 1996b. Individuality of understanding and assessment of sensory attributes of foods, in particular, tenderness of meat. Food Qual. Pref. 7, 205-216.
5. CARDELLO, A., MALLER, O., KAPSALIS, J.G., SEGARS, R.A., SAWYER, F.M. and MURPHY, C. 1982. Perception of texture by trained and consumer panelists. J. Food Sci. 47, 1186-1197.
6. DIJKSTERHUIS, G. 1995. Assessing panel consonance. Food Qual. Pref. 6, 7-14.
7. EDELMAN, S. 1998. Representation is representation of similarities. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 449-498.
8. ERICSSON, K.A. and LEHMAN, N. 1996. Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 47, 273-305.
9. FINN, R.H. 1970. A note on estimating the reliability of categorical data. Educ. Psychol. Measurement 30, 71-76.
10. GOLDSTONE, R.L. 1998. Perceptual learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49, 582-612.
11. rd. Karlsruhe Nutrition Symposium, Oct. 18-20, Karlsruhe, Germany.
12. GUERRERO, L., GOU, P. and ARNAU, J. 1997. Descriptive analysis of toasted almonds: a comparison between experts and semitrained assessors. J. Sensory Studies 12, 39-54.
13. HOUGH, G.T. 1998. Expert versus consumers: A critique. J. Sensory Studies 13, 285-289.
14. JAMES, L.R., DEMAREE, R.G. and WOLF, G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Applied Psychol. 69, 85-98.
15. wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J. Applied Psychol. 78, 306-309.
16. KILCAST, D. 1999. Sensory Technique to Study Food Texture. In Food Texture: Measurement and Perception, (A.J. Rosenthal, ed.) pp. 30-64, Aspen Pub. Gaithersburg, Maryland.
17. KNOWLTON, B.J. 1998. The relationship between remembering and knowing: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Acta Psychol. 98, 253-265.
18. LAVANCHY, P., BERODIER, F., ZANNONI, M., NOËL, Y., ADAMO, C. and HERRERO, L. 1993. L'evaluation sensorielle de la texture des fromages à pâte semi-dure. Etude interlaboratoires. Lebensm.-Wis. u.-Technol. 26(1), 59-68.
19. LAVANCHY, P. et al. 1994. Guía para la evaluación sensorial de la textura de quesos de pasta dura o semidura. Institut de la Recherche Agronomique, 147, rue de l'Université, 75007, Paris.
20. LINDELL, M.K. and BRANDT, C.J. 1997. Measuring interrater agreement for ratings of a single target. Appl. Psychol. Measure. 21, 271-278.
21. MIOCHE, L. and MARTIN, J.F. 1998. Training and sensory judgement effects on mastication as studied by electromyography. J. Food Sci. 53, 1-5.
22. MOSKOWITZ, H.R. 1996. Experts versus consumers: A comparison. J. Sensory Studies 11, 19-37.
23. MOSKOWITZ, H.T. 1998. Consumers versus experts in the light of psychophysics: A reply to Hough. J. Sensory Studies 13, 291-298.
24. PETRUSIC, N.M., BARANSKI, J.V. and KENNEDY, R. 1998. Similarity comparisons with remembered and perceived magnitudes: Memory psychophysics and fundamental measurement. Memory and Cognition 26, 1041-1055.
25. PONS, M. and FISZMAN, S.M. 1996. Instrumental texture profile analysis with particular reference to gelled systems. J. Texture Studies 27, 597-624.
26. ROBERTS, A. and VICKERS, Z.M. 1994. A comparison of trained and untrained judges' evaluation of sensory attribute intensities and liking of Cheddar cheeses. J. Sensory Studies 9, 1-20.
27. STEVENS, D.A. 1996. Individual differences in taste perception. Food Chem. 56, 303-311.
28. STONE, H. and SIDEL, J.L. 1998. Quantitative descriptive analysis: Developments, applications and the future. Food Technol. 52, 48-52.
29. SZCZESNIAK, A.S. 1998. Sensory texture profiling. Historical and scientific perspectives. Food Technol. 52, 54-57.
30. VAN LEHN, K. 1996. Cognitive skill acquisition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 47, 513-539.
31. WOLTERS, C.J. and ALLCHURCH, E.M. 1994. Effect of training procedure on the performance of descriptive panels. Food Qual. Pref. 5, 203-214.