Individual differences in taste perception

Food Chemistry

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 303-311

  Stevens, David A ^a  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; ODOR; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; QUALITY CONTROL; RECEPTOR AFFINITY; RESEARCH; SALIVATION; SENSORY STIMULATION; TASTE;

EID: 0029990790     PISSN: 03088146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0308-8146(96)00027-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bem, D. J. (1987). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance. Psychol. Rev., 74, 183-200.
2. Brockner, J. & Swap, W. C. (1983). Resolving the relationships between placebos, missattribution, and insomnia: An individual-differences perspective. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 45, 32-42.
3. Duncan, J. W. & Laird, J. D. (1980). Positive and negative placebo effects as a function of differenCes in cues used in self-perception. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 39, 1024-36.
4. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188-205.
5. Laird, J. D. & Crosby, M. (1974). Individual differences in the self-attribution of emotion, In Thought and Feeling: The Cognitive Alteration of Feeling States, eds H. London & R. Nisbett. Aldine, Chicago, 1974, pp. 44-59.
6. Laird, J. D. & Berglas, S. (1975). Individual differences in the effects of engaging in counter-attitudinal behaviour. J. Pers., 43, 286-304.
7. Laird, J. D. & Bresler, C. (1992). The process of emotional experience: A self-perception theory. In Emotion: Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 13, ed. M. S. Clark. Sage, Newbury Park, 213-34.
8. Lawless, H. T. & Stevens, D. A. (1983). Cross adaptation of sucrose and intensive sweeteners. Chem. Senses, 7, 309-15.
9. Miller, L. C., Murphy, R. & Buss, A. H. (1981). Consciousness of body: Private and public. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 41, 397-406.
10. O'Connell, R. J., Stevens, D. A., Akers, R. P., Coppola, D. M. & Grant, A. J. (1989). Individual differences in the quantitative and qualitative responses of human subjects to various odours. Chem. Senses, 14, 293-302.
11. O'Connell, R. J., Stevens, D. A. & Zogby, L. M. (1994). Individual differences in the perceived intensity and quality of specific odours following self- and cross-adaptation. Chem. Senses, 19, 197-208.
12. Stevens, D. A. & Lawless, H. T. (1981). Age-related changes in taste perception. Appetite, 2, 127-36
13. Stevens, D. A., Dooley, D. A. & Laird, J. D. (1988). Explaining individual differences in flavor perception. In Food Acceptability, ed. D. M. H. Thomson. Elsevier Scientific, London, pp. 173-80.
14. Stevens, D. A. (1990). Personality variables in the perception of oral irritation and flavour, In: Chemical Senses, Vol. 2: Irritation, eds B. G. Green, J. R. Mason & M. R. Kare. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 217-28.
15. Stevens, D. A. (1991a). Individual differences in effects of mouth movements on intensity of sweetness. Chem. Senses, 16, 586.
16. Stevens, D. A. (1991b). Individual differences in taste and smell, In Sensory Science Theory and Applications in Foods, eds H. T. Lawless & B. P. Klein. Marcel Dekker, New York, 295-316.
17. Stevens, D. A. & O'Connell, R. J. (1991). Individual differences in thresholds and quality reports of human subjects to various odours. Chem. Senses, 16, 57-67.
18. Stevens, D. A. & O'Connell, R. J. (1995). Pemenone and androstenone do not cross-adapt reciprocally. Chem. Senses, 20, 783.