Linking procedural and conceptual mathematical knowledge through CAL

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 156-165

  Kadijevich, Djordje ^a   Haapasalo, L ^b  

^a MATHEMATICAL INSTITUTE   (Serbia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Computer assisted learning; Conceptual knowledge; Constructivism; Mathematics education; Procedural knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035531595     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00168.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson, J. (1983) The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Bagui, S. (1998) Reasons for Increased Learning Using Multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 1, 3-18.
3. Fey, J. (1989) Technology and Mathematics Education: a Survey of Recent Developments and Important Problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 3, 237-272.
4. Galle, P. & Kovács, L.B. (1992) The logic of worms: a study in architectural knowledge representation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 19, 5-31.
5. Gelman, R. & Meek, E. (1986) The Notion of Principle: The Case of Counting. In Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: the Case of Mathematics (ed. J. Hiebert) pp. 29-57. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Gray, E. & Tall, D. (1993) Success and failure in mathematics: the flexible meaning of symbols as process and concept. Mathematics Teaching, 142, 6-10.
7. Grouws, D.A. (ed.) (1992) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Macmillan, New York.
8. Haapasalo, L. (1991) Constructivim in the guidance and analysis of mathematical concept building. Publication Series A. Research report 43. Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä.(English abstract: http://www.joensuu.fi/lenni/modem1e.html).
9. Haapasalo, L. (1992) Constructivist learning of fractions. Publication Series A. Research report 51. Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä (English abstract: http://www.joensuu.fi/lenni/modem2e.html).
10. Haapasalo, L. (1997) Planning and Assessment of Construction Processes in Collaborative Learning. In Learning & Technology - Dimensions to Learning Processes in Different Learning Environments (eds. S. Järvelä & E. Kunelius) pp. 51-66. Electronic Publications of the Pedagogical Faculty of the University of Oulu. (Editor in charge: L. Syrjälä). Internet: http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514248104/
11. Haapasalo, L. & Kadijevich, Dj. (2000) Two types of mathematical knowledge and their relation. Journal of Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 21, 2, 139-157.
12. Hochfelsner, C. & Kligner, W. (1998) Investigation of the impact of the TI-92 on manual calculating skills and on competence of reasoning and interpreting (in German). Internet: http://www.acdca.ac.at/projekt2/kl4/test4kt1.htm.
13. Howe, R. (1998) The AMS and Mathematics Education: The Revision of the 'NCTM Standards'. Notices of the American Mathematical Society of, 45, 2, 243-247.
14. Jonassen, D.H. (1996). Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking. Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
15. Kadijevich, Dj. (1994) The Development of Intelligent Tutoring Programs for Individual Mathematics Learning. Doctoral Dissertation (in Serbian). Technical Faculty Mihajlo Pupin, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad.
16. Kadijevich, Dj. (1998) Can Mathematics Students be Successful Knowledge Engineers? Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9, 3/4, 235-248.
17. Kadijevich, Dj. (1999) An approach to learning mathematics through knowledge engineering. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 4, 291-301.
18. Kadijevich, Dj. (2000) The LISD approach. Facta Universitatis (Series: Philosophy Sociology), 2, 7, 357-365.
19. Kaput, J. (1992) Technology and Mathematics Education. In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (ed. D.A. Grouws) pp. 515-556. Macmillan, NY.
20. Kokol-Voljc, V., Kutzler, B., Lokar, M. & Palcic, J. (eds.) (2000) Exam Questions & Basic Skills in Technology-Supported Mathematics Teaching (Proceedings Portoroz 2000). bk teachware, Hagenberg, Austria.
21. Laborde, C. (2000) Dynamic geometry software as a window on mathematical learning: empirical research on the use of CABRI-geometry. In Proceedings of the Second Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics Education (eds. A. Gagatsis & G. Makrides) pp. 161-173. Cyprus Mathematical Society & Cyprus Pedagogical Institute, Nicosia.
22. Nesher, P. (1986) Are Mathematical Understanding and Algorithmic Performance Related? For the Learning of Mathematics, 6, 2-9.
23. Papert, S. (1987) Microworlds: transforming education. In Artificial Intelligence and Education (Vol 1) (eds. R. Lawler & M. Yazdani) pp. 79-94. Albex Publishing, Norwood, NJ.
24. Pólya, G. (1990) How to Solve It (2nd edn). Penguin, London.
25. Schoenfcld, A.H. (1985) Mathematical Problem Solving. Academic Press. Orlando.
26. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992) Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics. In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (ed. D.A. Grouws) pp. 334-370. Macmillan, NY.
27. Schwarz, B., Dreyfus, T. & Bruckheimer, M. (1990) A model of the function concept in a tree-fold representation. Computers and Education, 14, 3, 249-262.
28. Simmons, M. & Cope, P. (1997) Working with a round turtle: the development of angle/rotation concepts under restricted feedback conditions. Computers and Education, 28, 1, 23-33.
29. Sterling, L. & Shapiro, E. (1986) The Art of Prolog. MIT Press. Cambridge.
30. Tripp, S.D. & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990) Rapid Prototyping: an Alternative Instructional Design Strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 31-44.
31. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Yerushalmy, M. (1991) Effects of computerized feedback on performing and debugging algebraic transformations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 3, 309-330.