A model for scholarship in nursing: The case of a private liberal arts college

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 217-222

  Nelson, Margot L ^a  

^a AUGUSTANA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION; UNITED STATES;

EDUCATION, NURSING; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; SOUTH DAKOTA;

EID: 0035459018     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mno.2001.116015     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities for the professoriate. Princeton (NJ): The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990.
2. Clark BR. Planning for excellence: the condition of the professoriate. Vol. 16. In: Planning for higher education. 1987. p. 1-8.
3. Bartels JE. Understanding teaching scholarship - beyond the dichotomization. J Prof Nurs 1997;13:278.
4. Rice RE. The new American scholar: scholarship and the purposes of the university. Metrop Univ 1991 Spring:1-18.
5. Maxwell N. From knowledge to wisdom. New York: Blackwell; 1984.
6. Riley JM, Omery A. The scholarship of a practice discipline. Holistic Nurs Pract 1996;10:7-14.
7. Schlotfeldt R. Why promote scholarship? Clin Nurs Res 1992;1:5-8.
8. Glassick C, Huber M, Maeroff G. Scholarship assessed: evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997.
9. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Position statement on defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing. Washington: The Association; 1999.
10. Leuning C, Small L, van Dyk A. Meanings and expressions of care and caring for elders in urban Namibian families: a transcultural nursing study. Curationis 2000;23:71-80.
11. Bunkers SS, Daly J. The lived experience of hope for Australian families living with coronary disease. In: Parse RR, editor. Hope: an international perspective. Boston: Jones and Bartlett; 1999. p. 45-61.
12. Bunkers SS, Nelson ML, Leuning C, Crane J, Josephson D. The health action model: academia's partnership with the community. In: Cohen EL, De Back V, editors. Outcomes mandate. St Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 92-100.
13. Starck PL. Boyer's multidimensional nature of scholarship: a new framework for schools of nursing. J Prof Nurs 1996;12:268-76.
14. Nelson M, Howell J, Karpiuk K, Larson J. Student outcomes of the Healing Web: evaluation of a transformative model for nursing education. J Nurs Educ. In press 2001.
15. Boyer EL. Clinical practice as scholarship. Holistic Nurs Pract 1996;10:1-6.
16. Meleis A. On the way to scholarship: from master's to doctorate. J Prof Nurs 1992;8:328-34.
17. Lynton EA, Elman SE. New priorities for the university. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987. p. 7.
18. Mills CW. The sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press; 1959.
19. Burns N. Standards for qualitative research. Nurs Sci Q 1989;2:44-52.
20. Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Adv Nurs Sci 1993;16:1-8.
21. Moore ME. Teaching from the heart. Minneapolis: Fortress Press; 1991.