Introducing technology in science education: The case of Guatemala

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 194-203

  Cajas, Fernando ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346596147     PISSN: 02704676     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/027046769801800307     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Association for the Advancement of the Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. American Association for the Advancement of the Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Barners, B. (1982). The science-technology relationship: A model and a query. Social Studies of Science, 12, 166-172.
4. Barry, T. (1994). Inside Guatemala. Albuquerque, NM: Inter-Hemispheric Education Resource Center.
5. Bijker, W., Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. (1987). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bijker, W., & Law, J. (1992). General introduction. In W. Bijkir, and J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 1-14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bucciarelli, L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bunge, M. (1985). Treatise on basic philosophy. Vol. 7: Epistemology and methodology III. Boston: Reidel.
9. Caillods, F. (1984). Education, organization of work and indigenous technological capacity. In M. Fransman & K. King (Eds.), Technological capability in the Third World (pp. 211-222). New York: St. Martin's.
10. Campbell, C., & Laherrére, J. (1998). The end of cheap oil. Scientific American, 278(3), 78-83.
11. Davis, G. (1990). Energy for planet Earth. Scientific American, 263(3), 55-62.
12. DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Gooding, D. (1992). Putting agency back into experiment. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Herrera, R. (1989). La practica teconologica. Revista Filosofia, 27(66), 349-359.
15. Herrera, R. (1996). Ingeniería: Un marco teórico. Ingenería, 5(1), 39-59.
16. Johnson, J. (1989). Technology (Report of Project 2061, Phase 1). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of the Science.
17. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Layton, D. (1993). Technology's challenge to science education. London: Open University.
19. Layton, E. (1974). Technological knowledge. Technology and Culture, 17, 688-700.
20. Layton, E. (1977). Condition of technological development. In I. Spiegel-Rösing & D. Solla (Eds.), Science technology and society: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 197-222). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21. Lewis, T. (1995). Including technology in the school curriculum of developing countries' education. Canadian and International Education, 24(2), 36-54.
22. Olsen, M., & Joerges, B. (1981). The process of promoting consumer energy conservation: An international perspective. Berlin, Germany: International Institute for Environment and Society.
23. Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1987). The social constructions of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. Bijkir, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch The social construction of technological systems (pp. 17-50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Polyani, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1958)
25. Raizen, S., Sellwood, P., Todd, R., & Vickers, M. (1995). Technology education in the classroom: Understanding the designed world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Roth, W. M. (1996). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. Journal of the Learning of Sciences, 5, 129-166.
27. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Arena.
28. Simon, H. (1969). The science of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Spiegel-Rösing, I. (1977). The study of science, technology, and society (SISS): Recent trends and future challenges. In I. Spiegel-Rosing and D. Solla (Eds.) Science, technology, and society: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 7-42). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. Turkic, S., & Papert, S. (1992). Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11, 3-33
31. United Nations. (1979). Proceedings of the workshop on biogas and other rural energy resources and the roving seminar on rural energy development (Energy Resource Development Series No. 19). New York: Author.
32. Vicenti, W. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Wheeler, C., Gallagher, J., MacDonough, M., & Sookpokakit-Namfa, B., (1997). Improving school-community relations in Thailand. In W. Cummings & P. Altbach (Eds.), The challenge of Eastern Asian education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
34. Yager, R. (1996). History of science: Technology/society as reform in the United States. In R. Yager (Ed.), Science/technology/ aociety as reform in science education (pp. 3-15). Albany: State University of New York Press.